Rice Genetics IV - IRRI books - International Rice Research Institute

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 3. QTLs detected for yield and yield component traits in the analysis of the “immortalized”F 2population for the field trial of 1998.Trait QTL Flanking markers LOD Var (%) A DYield (g) yd6 R2147-C751a 4.76 13.9 3.37 –2.75yd7 R1440-G678 2.60 3.6 –1.96 0.21yd9a G570-G667 3.20 4.5 –1.23 3.45yd9b RM201-RM215 3.05 12.5 –1.21 5.25yd11 R543a-RZ536 2.46 3.5 0.07 2.72Tillers plant –1 tp1 G236-C112 3.40 6.3 –0.80 –0.45tp3 C316-C63 3.73 5.2 0.79 0.27tp5a C734b-RZ649 3.31 5.6 –0.86 –0.20tp5b RM26-C1447 5.13 7.1 1.08 0.20tp6a RZ398-R1014 3.00 4.3 0.78 –0.78tp6b P-G200 3.81 5.3 –0.29 –1.01Grains panicle –1 gp1 RM237-C922 3.08 5.5 0.99 8.22gp3 RZ403-C1087 3.96 6.3 6.38 0.45gp6 R2147-C751a 4.51 8.8 7.42 –3.73gp7 C1023-R1440 4.53 6.6 –6.38 2.22gp12 R887-G1314b 3.19 4.5 4.79 5.46Grain weight (g) kgw1a G359-G532 4.52 7.1 0.75 0.24gw1b C86-G236 2.68 4.5 0.59 0.07kgw3a G393-G144 10.04 13.4 –1.01 –0.33kgw3b RZ403-C1087 17.88 26.0 –1.40 –0.76kgw5 G360-C734b 8.33 13.0 1.03 –0.08kgw7 G528-G128 4.71 6.9 –0.73 0.24kgw7 G678-RZ471 2.79 4.4 –0.58 –0.41kgw8 R1394-R727 2.99 4.8 0.41 –0.61kgw9 RM242-G570 3.22 4.8 0.70 –0.05kgw10 C1633-C677 3.31 5.3 0.55 0.53kgw11 G44-G257 2.42 3.7 –0.65 0.36kgw12 G1128a-R887 3.57 5.0 0.64 0.45Table 4. Significant interactions identified for performance of yield and yieldcomponent traits by searching all possible (23,239 in total) two-locus combinations.Trait Pairs a AA b AD (DA) b DD bYield 134 116 70 16Tillers plant –1 96 86 50 7Grains panicle –1 100 79 51 14Grain weight 224 185 78 16aSignificant at the 0.001 probability level. b Significant at the 0.01 probability level.traits and genes in the manifestation of heterosis is much more complex than hascommonly been expected on the basis of dominance and overdominance hypotheses.Gene expression and heterosisWe have also been interested in the last several years in the relations between geneexpression and heterosis, with the belief that the manifestation of heterosis is thedirect outcome of gene expression.180 Qifa Zhang et al
Correlation between gene expression in leaves and heterosisEight commonly used parental lines of hybrid rice were employed in this study includingthree restorer lines (Ce 64-7, Minghui 63, and Teqing) and maintainers offive male sterile lines (Guang B, Maxie, Qing Si Ai, Xian Gai, and Zhenshan 97).These lines were intermated in all possible nonreciprocal combinations to form adiallel set of 28 crosses, which were previously examined for yield and several agronomiccharacters in replicated field trials. This is the same diallel set of parents andhybrids that Zhang et al (1994, 1995) used to assess the relationship between geneticdiversity of molecular markers and heterosis.Differential display (Liang and Pardee 1992) of the mRNA was conducted usingflag leaf tissue from each of the parents and hybrids. The details of the analysis weredescribed previously (Xiong et al 1998). Six of the most informative primer combinations,displaying the largest number of differential bands, were used to survey thelevel of differential expression among the various crosses of the diallel set. Among atotal of approximately 350 bands that could be repeatedly amplified using the sixprimer pairs, 135 fragments represented sequences that were differentially expressedamong the parents and F 1 s in at least one cross. The analysis revealed several patternsof differential expression including (1) bands present in one parent and F 1 but absentin the other parent (DMPT), (2) bands observed in both parents but not in the F 1(ABF 1 ), (3) bands occurring in only one parent but not in the F 1 or the other parent(UNP), and (4) bands detected only in the F 1 but in neither of the parents (UNF 1 ).Both banding patterns of ABF 1 and UNF 1 signified the uniqueness of the F 1 comparedwith the parents (DF 1 ).We calculated the correlations of the various banding patterns with the performanceand heterosis of the hybrids (Table 5). In general, the correlation betweendifferential expression and hybrid performance is low. However, two types of differentialexpression showed highly significant correlations with heterosis: UNF 1 wasnegatively correlated with the heterosis of all traits, whereas UNP was positivelycorrelated with heterosis.We also calculated the correlation between differential gene expression and molecularmarker heterozygosity (Table 6). UNF 1 was correlated with general heterozygositythat referred to the overall level of heterozygosity of the hybrid (Zhang et al1994), and was negatively correlated with the specific heterozygosity of all six traitsTable 5. Correlations of various patterns of differential expression with heterosis of six traits(adapted from Xiong et al 1998).PopulationPlantTillers Grains Grainheight a Biomassplant –1 panicle –1 weightYieldABF 10.255 0.307 0.070 0.375 0.271 0.362UNF 1–0.454* –0.538** –0.449* –0.429* –0.517** –0.547**DF 1–0.197 –0.229 –0.360 –0.065 –0.242 –0.187DMP T–0.144 –0.128 –0.041 –0.153 –0.208 –0.135UNP 0.437* 0.486** 0.370 0.288 0.577** 0.377a*, ** = statistically significant at the 0.05 and 0.01 probability levels, respectively.Genetic and molecular basis of heterosis in rice 181
Page 6:
Retrotransposons of rice as a tool
Page 11 and 12:
First, the Rice Genetics Cooperativ
Page 13 and 14:
OverviewRice genetics from Mendel t
Page 15 and 16:
Rice genetics from Mendelto functio
Page 17 and 18:
nese cultivar Nipponbare. The chrom
Page 19:
Gene symbolization in riceIn the ab
Page 26 and 27:
Table 2. Some examples of mapping g
Page 28 and 29:
and YAC libraries, respectively. Th
Page 30 and 31:
gene from wild species is the intro
Page 32 and 33:
ReferencesAbbasi FM, Brar DS, Carpe
Page 35 and 36:
Nagao S. 1951. Genic analysis and l
Page 37:
Yoshimura S, Yamanouchi U, Katayose
Page 40 and 41:
important traits for which segregat
Page 42 and 43:
trolled by a single recessive gene,
Page 44 and 45:
AromaAromatic rice varieties often
Page 46 and 47:
Submergence tolerance is an interes
Page 48 and 49:
Kinoshita T, Maekawa M. 1986. Genet
Page 50 and 51:
NotesAuthors’ addresses: J.N. Rut
Page 52 and 53:
The Rockefeller Foundation has a lo
Page 54 and 55:
Evolution and implementation of the
Page 56 and 57:
Scientific progress and outputsIn t
Page 58 and 59:
Another salient example is that of
Page 60 and 61:
BOX NO. 1recent international works
Page 62 and 63:
For the purposes of this discussion
Page 64 and 65:
Because of the great diversity (sci
Page 66 and 67:
eeders where final products to enha
Page 68 and 69:
Chen S, Lin XH, Xu CG, Zhang Q. 200
Page 70 and 71:
Toenniessen GH. 1998. Rice biotechn
Page 73 and 74:
Molecular markers,genetic diversity
Page 75 and 76:
Evolution and domestication of rice
Page 77 and 78:
ABCDO. barthiiO. rufipogonO. longis
Page 79 and 80:
Wild(O. rufipogon)Geographical diff
Page 81 and 82:
South Asia (particularly on the wes
Page 83 and 84:
al 1992, Sun et al 1996a,b,c), thou
Page 85 and 86:
wild and cultivated types (Est10, W
Page 87 and 88:
Cai HW, Morishima H. 2000a. Diversi
Page 89:
Sato YI, Tang SX, Yang LU, Tang LH.
Page 92 and 93:
The solid base laid by classical ri
Page 94 and 95:
The synthesis shown in Figure 1 is
Page 96 and 97:
Arabidopsis, long heralded as a “
Page 98 and 99:
Monocots and eudicots: Is there sti
Page 100 and 101:
Zhang H, Jia J, Gale MD, Devos KM.
Page 102 and 103:
ility of rice productivity (Lu 1999
Page 104 and 105:
Table 1 continuedIntrageneric class
Page 106 and 107:
Molecular markers and evolutionary
Page 108 and 109:
A100100521010078100991009894100O. s
Page 110 and 111:
Two distinct types of sequences wer
Page 112 and 113:
arthii and O. longistaminata, and t
Page 114 and 115:
testing Ka/Ks between the homeologo
Page 116 and 117:
Roschevicz RI. 1931. A contribution
Page 119 and 120:
Miniature inverted repeattransposab
Page 121 and 122:
eau and Wessler 1992, 1994), rice (
Page 123 and 124:
MITEs as a source of allelic divers
Page 125 and 126:
ATIR Olo-D* Olo-CTIRBCas Exp Wan Sn
Page 127 and 128:
Le QH, Wright S, Yu Z, Bureau T. 20
Page 129 and 130:
Microsatellite markers in rice:abun
Page 131 and 132:
make the best SSR markers for rice.
Page 133 and 134:
Predicted frequency100,00080,000Cla
Page 135 and 136:
Relationship between SSRs and genes
Page 139 and 140:
are indicated with RM locus designa
Page 141 and 142: SSRs have been used to define intro
Page 143 and 144: provide a bridge for moving rapidly
Page 145 and 146: Ishii T, McCouch SR. 2000. Microsat
Page 147: NotesAuthors’ addresses: S.R. McC
Page 150 and 151: traits of economic importance (Mack
Page 152 and 153: Table 2. Tagging and mapping of som
Page 154 and 155: even at the juvenile stage. Several
Page 156 and 157: Chen et al (2000) transferred the b
Page 158 and 159: genome sequence of rice, this will
Page 160 and 161: Kurata N, Nagamura Y, Yamamoto K, H
Page 162 and 163: Witcombe JR, Hash CT. 2000. Resista
Page 165 and 166: QTL mapping in rice:a few critical
Page 167 and 168: M-QTLsM-QTLs are defined as single
Page 169 and 170: (genetic/statistical models and cor
Page 171 and 172: Table 5. The percentage of three ty
Page 173 and 174: Table 7. Some environment-specific
Page 175 and 176: ferently to the environments. Simil
Page 177 and 178: (case 3), one may infer that this g
Page 179 and 180: Simultaneous QTL introgression and
Page 181 and 182: Doebley J, Stec A, Gustus C. 1995.
Page 183: Visscher PM, Haley CS, Thompson R.
Page 186 and 187: unavailable until recently with the
Page 188 and 189: Table 1 continued.Trait QTL a Flank
Page 190 and 191: the remaining parts of the linkage
Page 194 and 195: Table 6. Correlations of various pa
Page 196 and 197: The functions of these sequences ne
Page 199 and 200: Structural and functional genomicsT
Page 201 and 202: The International Rice GenomeSequen
Page 203 and 204: the RGP, a PAC (P1-derived artifici
Page 205 and 206: Progress of sequencing in the RGPWe
Page 207 and 208: ice genome sequencing to organize a
Page 209 and 210: Strategies and techniquesfor finish
Page 211 and 212: uses the quality values generated b
Page 213 and 214: with the advanced techniques requir
Page 215 and 216: times contain sufficient data to ma
Page 217 and 218: amplification of regions that previ
Page 219 and 220: 4. Structure problems—subcloning
Page 221 and 222: estriction maps or optical maps are
Page 223 and 224: nal assembly may point to areas tha
Page 225 and 226: McMurray AA, Sulston JE, Quail MA.
Page 227 and 228: Sequence-tagged connector/DNA finge
Page 229 and 230: 1999). The development of multiple-
Page 231 and 232: Transposable elements in the rice H
Page 233 and 234: ers, maps, mapping populations, and
Page 235 and 236: Miropeats-OSJNBa0065H03 1.2 cMThres
Page 237: NotesAuthors’ addresses: R.A. Win
Page 240 and 241: Sasaki 1997). Such analysis is ofte
Page 242 and 243:
ABNipponbare × KasalathF 2QTL anal
Page 244 and 245:
were classified into two groups bas
Page 246 and 247:
effective at determining the genoty
Page 248 and 249:
addition, some accessions of wild r
Page 250 and 251:
Sasaki T, Burr T. 2000. Internation
Page 252 and 253:
Mutational analysis has long been t
Page 254 and 255:
marked by a deletion/chromosomal re
Page 256 and 257:
analysis suggests that the mutation
Page 258 and 259:
For drought-response screening, our
Page 260 and 261:
Pi-7(t)Xa21Xa10Xa3Xa4Pi-1(t)Pi-k, P
Page 262 and 263:
Although mutants with discrete gene
Page 265 and 266:
Generation of T-DNA insertionaltagg
Page 267 and 268:
Aprobe AEEprobe BpGA1633RBgus Tn p3
Page 269 and 270:
Number of loci36%224%170%010 20 30F
Page 271 and 272:
Table 2. GUS assay in roots of tran
Page 273 and 274:
1999, Krysan et al 1999, Sato et al
Page 275 and 276:
Transposons and functionalgenomics
Page 277 and 278:
cesses. To study the interactions a
Page 279 and 280:
Constructs were made with the aim o
Page 281 and 282:
RBcis-effect of the adjacent strong
Page 283 and 284:
Ac knockout mutagenesisThe Ac lines
Page 285 and 286:
Table 2 summarizes the transformati
Page 287 and 288:
ReferencesBaldwin D, Crane V, Rice
Page 289:
NotesAuthors’ addresses: R. Greco
Page 292 and 293:
These include T-DNA (Azpiroz-Leehan
Page 294 and 295:
polyproteins and two identical 138-
Page 296 and 297:
mutant. The mutation in the ent-kau
Page 298 and 299:
primers (G1, G2) and two Tos17-spec
Page 300 and 301:
of insertion mutants by sequencing
Page 302 and 303:
Grandbastien M-A, Spielman A, Caboc
Page 304 and 305:
NotesAuthors’ addresses: H. Hiroc
Page 306 and 307:
human endeavor, greatly contributed
Page 308 and 309:
Equally important as the genomic in
Page 310 and 311:
Oryzabase is one of the most recent
Page 312 and 313:
Database structureA characteristic
Page 314 and 315:
types of users. An annotation datab
Page 316 and 317:
ReferencesAntonio BA, Fang Z, Sanch
Page 319 and 320:
Gene isolation and functionEnhancin
Page 321 and 322:
Enhancing deployment of genes forbl
Page 323 and 324:
mochi and Tsuyuake (Wu et al 1996).
Page 325 and 326:
tive indica rice varieties supports
Page 327 and 328:
transcription factor, resulting in
Page 329 and 330:
facilitate breeding durable resista
Page 331 and 332:
(Inukai et al 1994, Yu et al 1996,
Page 333 and 334:
Rossman AY, Howard RJ, Valent B. 19
Page 335 and 336:
Molecular signaling in diseaseresis
Page 337 and 338:
AOsRac1IED II III IV 214aaOsRac1 KC
Page 339 and 340:
Japonica rice variety Kinmaze, whic
Page 341 and 342:
Table 1. Characteristics of lesion-
Page 343 and 344:
an effective inducer of host resist
Page 345:
Takahashi A, Kawasaki T, Henmi K, S
Page 348 and 349:
et al 2000). Sequence analysis of t
Page 350 and 351:
612-amino acid protein, including t
Page 352 and 353:
Genetic dissection of the Xa21-medi
Page 354 and 355:
ReferencesAnderson PA, Lawrence GJ,
Page 357 and 358:
Isolation of candidate genesfor tol
Page 359 and 360:
Materials and methodsPlant material
Page 361 and 362:
Microarray hybridization and data a
Page 363 and 364:
Table 3. Most abundant transcripts
Page 365 and 366:
Microarray technologyThe rapid accu
Page 367 and 368:
view of procedures, pitfalls, and n
Page 369 and 370:
Log(2) ratio1.51.0OC104E01—WCP1OC
Page 371 and 372:
Table 5. Strongly regulated transcr
Page 373 and 374:
ReferencesAdams MD, Soares MB, Kerl
Page 375:
Acknowledgments: We thank Chris Bor
Page 378 and 379:
y cells separating during tissue de
Page 380 and 381:
(Erwee and Goodwin 1983). The sympl
Page 382 and 383:
tion between the abundance of CDK t
Page 384 and 385:
in a complex of 105 kDa. These resu
Page 386 and 387:
Drew MC, Jackson MB, Giffard S. 197
Page 388 and 389:
Umeda M, Umeda-Hara C, Yamaguchi M,
Page 390 and 391:
asexual reproduction through apomix
Page 392 and 393:
MPManual pollination by breeders×
Page 394 and 395:
Search for apomixis in riceThere ar
Page 396 and 397:
Issues related to achieving synthet
Page 398 and 399:
come and may use imprinting to achi
Page 400 and 401:
Embryo-inducing geneInactive ablati
Page 402 and 403:
M 1 3 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Page 404 and 405:
embryos, several genes characterist
Page 406 and 407:
Our search for a rice homologue of
Page 408 and 409:
sequenced the two rice DMC1 genes a
Page 410 and 411:
Gustine DL, Sherwood RT, Huff DR. 1
Page 412 and 413:
Peel MD, Carman JG, Leblanc O. 1997
Page 415 and 416:
TransformationEngineering for virus
Page 417 and 418:
Engineering for virusresistance in
Page 419 and 420:
proteins, (2) the expression of dys
Page 421 and 422:
Antisense and cosuppression RNA. Ex
Page 423 and 424:
Table 1. Transgenic rice with patho
Page 425 and 426:
the disease symptoms. Efforts from
Page 427 and 428:
an ambisense coding strategy (Fig.
Page 429 and 430:
first produced and shown to have vi
Page 431 and 432:
McLean GD, Evans G. 1997. Some pote
Page 433:
Waterhouse PM, Upadhyaya NM. 1998.
Page 436 and 437:
duction in response to dehydration
Page 438 and 439:
(KIKEKLPG) in the carboxyl terminus
Page 440 and 441:
These three plasmids were used to t
Page 442 and 443:
We now show the effects of the toba
Page 444 and 445:
Since one major goal of plant scien
Page 446 and 447:
Table 4. Copy number of transgenes
Page 448 and 449:
Chan M-T, Chang H-H, Ho S-L, Tang W
Page 450 and 451:
NotesAuthors’ address: Department
Page 452 and 453:
initially fixed by phosphoenolpyruv
Page 454 and 455:
High-level expression of maize C 4-
Page 456 and 457:
The effect of illumination on PPDK
Page 458 and 459:
ate in 2% O 2 can be limited by Pi
Page 461 and 462:
Transgene integration,organization,
Page 463 and 464:
duced by organogenesis, somatic emb
Page 465 and 466:
ing transgene organization. FISH an
Page 467 and 468:
ments and the integration of exogen
Page 469 and 470:
Level 2: activation of local repair
Page 471 and 472:
strongly suggested that plant facto
Page 473 and 474:
other cases it was not. We observed
Page 475 and 476:
Gorbunova V, Levy AA. 1997. Non-hom
Page 477 and 478:
Gene silencing and itsreactivation
Page 479 and 480:
Carbofuran (trade name, Furadan) is
Page 481 and 482:
Akb4xHpaIIJKA52 (R 0)52-6 (R 1)52-9
Page 483 and 484:
ABCDhptuidAmUbi1kb10.08.05.04.13.0F
Page 485 and 486:
Fig. 4. X-gluc staining of germinat
Page 487 and 488:
eflect different causes for silenci
Page 489 and 490:
Table 4. Suppressors of silencing f
Page 491 and 492:
Garrick D, Fiering S, Martin DI, Wh
Page 493:
Xu Y, Buchholz WG, DeRose RT, Hall
Page 496 and 497:
Rice molecular breeding workshopThi
Page 498 and 499:
the working group can develop a net
Page 500:
Rice genetics cooperativeA meeting
show all

Rice Genetics IV - IRRI books - International Rice Research Institute

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?