LEBANONPOST-CONFLICT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTThe Ghadir outfall at OuzaiiOne of the river samples had cadmium, seleniumand zinc values above the screening criteria. It wasnot possible to determine the contaminant source,but lower pH is known to increase the solubilityof metals present in soil minerals. Napthelene,a semi-volatile organic compound, was alsodetected marginally above the intervention value(89 ng/l) in one of the river samples. This mayhave been due to fuel oil, and/or antiseptics usedto disinfect fish tanks. Nitrate, which was likely tohave originated from the fish feed, was found atlevels marginally above those expected in naturalwaters. In addition, nutrient loading from feedadditives was observed to have stimulated thegrowth of algal mats in the fish ponds, whichcould deplete dissolved oxygen levels whenthey died and decomposed. However, dissolvedoxygen concentrations in the river water and thefish tanks were within natural range, indicatingthat conditions were not anoxic. Frogs, tadpolesand aquatic insect larva were found to provide abiological indicator of reasonable water quality.<strong>UNEP</strong>’s assessment is that the destruction ofthe Hermel aquaculture farms created an acutepollution event in the first two to three weeks, butdid not generate a continuous or long-term sourceof contamination. As the strike occurred when theAl-Assi was in its high stage – unlike other riversin <strong>Lebanon</strong>, the Al-Assi’s discharge peaks in July 14– the spill represented a single pollution slug thatwas largely diluted by the sizeable volume andhigh velocity of the river flow. The medium- tolonger-term risk to the Al-Assi river ecology istherefore considered low in severity and extent.Nonetheless, remaining contaminants presentin the destroyed fish tanks represent a low-levelpollution risk that should be remediated beforethe onset of the next rains and/or floods to preventoverflow. <strong>UNEP</strong> recommends that plans to cleanup the sites be prepared, taking the possibility ofdecommissioning the facility into account. Plansto reactivate aquaculture farming should furtherinclude collection of baseline water data andmonitoring programme to ensure that it is of asuitable quality.124 • United Nations Environment Programme • United Nations Environment Programme • United Nations Environment Programme •
WATER RESOURCESGhadir outfall and land-based sources ofmarine pollutionThe other main point source identified by <strong>UNEP</strong>was the Ghadir outfall, discharging directly into theMediterranean Sea. While the routine industrialdischarge of untreated effluent into the Ghadiris a chronic problem, the damage incurred byChoueifat’s industrial facilities during the conflictinvariably increased the pollution load andconsequently contributed to the degradation ofseawater quality. The Ghadir was sampled in fourdifferent locations in the industrial area and nearits sea outfall. Laboratory analysis showed BODand COD values to be two to seven times greaterthan the permissible “environment limit valuesfor wastewater discharge” set by the LebaneseMinistry of Environment. In addition, faecalcoliform counts revealed that it was more than 2.75orders of magnitude of permissible levels. Theseexceptionally high levels may have been partiallydue to contamination caused by the shelling of anindustrial cattle feedlot. Phosphate concentrationswere also elevated, ranging from 10.62 to 14.88mg/l, which could lead to serious eutrophication inreceiving coastal waters. Finally, toxic compoundslike benzene, naphthalene and toluene alsoconsiderably exceeded intervention levels.Given its impact on both surface water andthe marine environment, <strong>UNEP</strong> recommendsthat industrial and domestic effluent from theheadwater to the outfall of the Ghadir catchmentbe addressed as a matter of priority. This is all themore significant as <strong>Lebanon</strong> is a Contracting Partyto the Barcelona Convention for the Protection ofthe Marine Environment and the Coastal Regionof the Mediterranean, and that it very recentlyendorsed its latest amendments. <strong>Lebanon</strong> has notyet ratified the Protocol for the Protection of theMediterranean Sea against Pollution from Land-Based Sources and Activities.Structural damage and hydrological flowsThe United Nations damage assessment hasreported that 101 bridges and overpasses weredamaged or destroyed during the conflict 15 .Many of these bridges were located over riversand streams. All the crossings on the LitaniRiver, for example, were destroyed. Bridge debrishas clogged rivers and, in some cases, seriouslyreduced their flow capacity, threatening to disruptfish migrations. Moreover, rubble from the warwas dumped into seasonal water courses in someplaces, such as Araya. Although there has beena major drive to rebuild the bridges, <strong>UNEP</strong>observed that in several cases the rubble remainedin the river. If this wreckage is not promptlyremoved, it could cause flooding, particularlywith the onset of the winter rains. During thesummer season, the rubble obstructed riverflow and created stagnant pools, affecting waterquality.Debris from destroyed bridges, such as this one on the Litani River, could lead to flooding in the rainy season• United Nations Environment Programme • United Nations Environment Programme • United Nations Environment Programme •125