13.07.2015 Views

a growing experience - Student Services - University of Melbourne

a growing experience - Student Services - University of Melbourne

a growing experience - Student Services - University of Melbourne

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

HEALTH AND WELL-BEING OF INTERNATIONAL STUDENTSWhile some demographic variables (gender, course type, using a LOTE <strong>of</strong>f campusand country <strong>of</strong> origin) were found to be significantly associated with the typology,they did not prove to be useful predictors <strong>of</strong> or means <strong>of</strong> discrimination among thecluster groupings <strong>of</strong> students. The best model <strong>of</strong> prediction <strong>of</strong> the cluster groupingsaccounted for, at most, 3.2 per cent <strong>of</strong> the variance in the classification and wasunable to classify any students correctly into clusters 2 or 3. Discriminant analysisresulted in the classification <strong>of</strong> students at no better than chance level. Demographicfactors do not seem to be helpful in accounting for the modes <strong>of</strong> adaptation andrelated levels <strong>of</strong> well-being <strong>of</strong> international students.This is consistent with findings from other research (Diener et al., 1999) thatdemographic factors account for only small amounts <strong>of</strong> variance in subjective wellbeing.In discussing this, Diener and his colleagues indicate that researchers havenow turned to within-person variables as ones more likely to account for differencesin perceptions <strong>of</strong> well-being, variables such as personality, goal structure (includingcultural differences based on the individualism-collectivism dimension) and adaptivecoping strategies. If this is the case, then the typology <strong>of</strong> student styles <strong>of</strong> adaptationmight be seen as generic in nature, that is, it could well apply to all universitystudents, whether domestic or international.While the challenge <strong>of</strong> adapting to university life is generally much less for domesticstudents, they still confront cultural changes requiring adaptation. These couldinclude the change from school to university life and from living at home in rural,interstate or New Zealand locations to living in <strong>Melbourne</strong>. Domestic students alsoinclude many first and second generation citizens from a range <strong>of</strong> other cultures. Itwould be interesting to see whether domestic students show evidence <strong>of</strong> the samethree styles <strong>of</strong> adaptation to university life and life in <strong>Melbourne</strong>.GROUP DIFFERENCES IN PERCEPTIONS OFHEALTH AND WELL-BEINGDemographic and related information was collected at the outset <strong>of</strong> the questionnaire.This information concerns aspects <strong>of</strong> life thought to be relevant to internationalstudent <strong>experience</strong> and adaptation:• time in the country - years enrolled at the university, number <strong>of</strong> secondary schoolyears in Australia, completion <strong>of</strong> a Foundation Studies program;• age;• gender;• relationships - marital status, child present in Australia;• course <strong>of</strong> study - faculty, course type;• cultural background - country category, Asian/non-Asian, speaker <strong>of</strong> someEnglish when <strong>growing</strong> up, LOTE speaker <strong>of</strong>f campus;• perceived academic progress.These variables are not independent <strong>of</strong> one another. For example, age and course typeare related, as are the four variables concerning cultural background. Each, however,measures something different.Rosenthal, Russell & Thomson, 2006 118

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!