Note 11Growth-<strong>for</strong>msField guides to wetland plantsemphasise visual cues, so tend to usegrowth-<strong>for</strong>m as part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> identifyingcharacteristics. Growth-<strong>for</strong>m isusually combined with o<strong>the</strong>rcharacteristics, <strong>of</strong>ten expressed inplain English; <strong>for</strong> example, growth<strong>for</strong>mand leaf shape “submerged, notfea<strong>the</strong>ry” is used by Sainty andJacobs (1994). See Hutchinson(1975) <strong>for</strong> an introduction tohistorical terminology and <strong>the</strong>source <strong>of</strong> technical words such ashydrophytes and macrophytes.However, growth-<strong>for</strong>m does not make perfect predictions about how agroup <strong>of</strong> species responds to water regime. This is because growth-<strong>for</strong>mis not a complete summary <strong>of</strong> all adaptations, nor do all species with<strong>the</strong> same growth-<strong>for</strong>m have <strong>the</strong> same adaptations. Growth-<strong>for</strong>m refersto only one phase in <strong>the</strong> life cycle, <strong>the</strong> established adult, and to just onepart <strong>of</strong> a plant’s environment, namely water level. Conventionaldescriptions <strong>of</strong> growth-<strong>for</strong>m do not cover amphibious or mudflatspecies very well.Figure 8. Structural diversityIn wet seasons, floodwaters spread into rarely-flooded areas where <strong>the</strong>species <strong>of</strong> macrophytes that develop are influenced by <strong>the</strong> season <strong>of</strong>flooding. Autumn flooding on <strong>the</strong> Murrumbidgee floodplain hasproduced a sparse cover <strong>of</strong> Marsilea drummondii, Triglochin dubium,Rumex and unidentified grasses. Nearby (not shown) was densecontinuous growth <strong>of</strong> Eleocharis acuta in shallow ponded water; indeeper water, dense beds <strong>of</strong> Characeae and Damasonium minus withabundant shield shrimps, Notostraca. Delta Creek, May 1990.For a description <strong>of</strong> terrestrialgrowth-<strong>for</strong>ms current in Australia,see Walker and Hopkins (1990).Although widely used in scientific and general literature, <strong>the</strong>re is nostandard set <strong>of</strong> names <strong>for</strong> growth-<strong>for</strong>ms. This is not as frustrating as itsounds, because modern practice is to use descriptions such as freefloatingor floating-leafed plant, ra<strong>the</strong>r than classical terminology (Note11). In <strong>the</strong> past, scientists struggled to develop an all-encompassing set<strong>of</strong> names to describe all aquatic and some amphibious growth-<strong>for</strong>ms.This resulted in a plethora <strong>of</strong> quasi-technical terms in <strong>the</strong> scientificliterature <strong>of</strong> up to about 25 years ago. A few, such as hydrophyte andmacrophyte, remain current. A limited number <strong>of</strong> conventional aquaticgrowth-<strong>for</strong>ms is used in this guide (Figure 9).Plant functional typesPlant functional types (PFT) are groups <strong>of</strong> plants with a similar responseor responses to one or a range <strong>of</strong> specific environmental conditions,such as resource availability or disturbance. Responses are a set <strong>of</strong> traits.The traits may be measurements, such as biomass, seed size or specificleaf area, or may be based on published knowledge, such as whe<strong>the</strong>r aplant is a C-3 or a C-4 species. The choice <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se traits assumes <strong>the</strong>yare representative <strong>of</strong>, or correlate with, ecological characteristics suchas competitiveness, seedbank longevity or relative growth rate.Alternatively, traits may be empirically defined through experiments;<strong>for</strong> example, by germinating or growing a number <strong>of</strong> species under26 <strong>Estimating</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Requirements</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Plants</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Floodplain</strong> <strong>Wetlands</strong>
Figure 9. Aquatic growth-<strong>for</strong>msText gives a general description, with notes on adaptations and some examples. Diagrams are drawn to differentscales, (*) indicates an introduced species.EMERGENT MACROPHYTES – erect <strong>for</strong>msRooted in sediment, leaves growing through water, into air. Size ranges from tall >1 m, medium to small. C-3 and C-4species. Forms with leaf blades have high surface area, <strong>of</strong>ten very productive. Tall <strong>for</strong>ms <strong>of</strong>ten dominant.Can grow in permanent water, but tolerant <strong>of</strong> periodic temporary dry conditions or deeper water. Rhizome and rhizosphereoxygenated from leaves.Tall and medium <strong>for</strong>ms are mainly perennials. Most perennials have substantial underground carbohydrate storage, usuallyrhizomes but sometimes as corms or tubers.Monocots, mostly from Cyperaceae or Poaceae. Examples <strong>of</strong> species are Typha, Phragmites, Eleocharis, Cyperus, Baumea,Bolboschoenus, Juncus.EMERGENT MACROPHYTES – trailing <strong>for</strong>msRooted at channel edge or bank. Leaves on water or slightly rising above surface, from floating stems or stolons. Traildownstream in low-velocity current.Buoyancy mechanisms <strong>for</strong> stems not always evident but can include inflated hollow stems, spongy tissues. Stems flexible,not rigid, so move easily with small changes in water level or waves.Many species have rootlets at nodes, some species can establish from fragments with <strong>the</strong>se.Examples: Ludwigia peploides, Rumex bidens (*), Nymphoides spp., also several grasses with prostrate-ascending stems,eg. Pseudoraphis spinescens.FLOATING-LEAFED MACROPHYTES – trailing <strong>for</strong>msRooted in sediment, leaves floating on water surface. Floating leaf typically rounded or oval, glossy above, and may becomemore erect when leaves are crowded. Some species have, initially, submerged leaves.Grow in or near permanent water, to 2 m sometimes 3 m, depth range defined by length <strong>of</strong> stem or petiole. Stems havelacunae, and/or aerenchyma, to facilitate internal movement <strong>of</strong> gases.Mainly perennials. Rhizome may be compact at stem base, or bulky and extensive.Species in <strong>the</strong> family Nymphaceae, also Ottelia ovalifolia, Brasenia schreberi, Potamogeton tricarinatus, Marsilea spp.,Villarsia reni<strong>for</strong>mis, Nelumbo nucifera.SUBMERGED MACROPHYTERooted in sediment, and grow submerged in water,
- Page 1 and 2: Estimating the WaterRequirements fo
- Page 3 and 4: ContentsPreface 7Acknowledgments 8G
- Page 5: List of Tables1 Spatial variability
- Page 8 and 9: Note that the guide is concerned pr
- Page 10 and 11: ecomes a matter of how to use what
- Page 12 and 13: Figure 1. Floodplain featuresThe fl
- Page 14 and 15: Figure 4.Wanganella Swamps, souther
- Page 16 and 17: Floodplain wetlands, being a mosaic
- Page 18 and 19: Section 2:Introducing theVegetation
- Page 20 and 21: size and vigour rarely reach their
- Page 22 and 23: floodplains survive there because t
- Page 24 and 25: The lagoon floor is then colonised
- Page 28 and 29: identical conditions. PFTs differ f
- Page 30 and 31: Note 13Changes in depthSome herbace
- Page 32 and 33: Focusing on depthWater regime analy
- Page 34 and 35: Note 15Internet dataEnvironmental d
- Page 36 and 37: Step 3: Vegetation-hydrologyrelatio
- Page 38 and 39: Note 19Modelling and time-stepsIn s
- Page 40 and 41: Section 4: Old andNew DataOne of th
- Page 42 and 43: see Figure 15), despite a three-fol
- Page 44 and 45: frequency. This is rather limiting,
- Page 46 and 47: Figure 13. Lippia, a floodplain wee
- Page 48 and 49: single measure of the vegetation to
- Page 50 and 51: Section 5:ObtainingVegetation DataW
- Page 52 and 53: However, if the chosen species has
- Page 54 and 55: Figure 15. Range of tree condition
- Page 56 and 57: Figure 16. Spatial-temporal sequenc
- Page 58 and 59: Note 26Canopy condition indexA visu
- Page 60 and 61: Note 27Mapping floodplainwetland ve
- Page 62 and 63: Shape of species responseThe shape
- Page 64 and 65: Figure 18. Heat pulse sensorHeat pu
- Page 66 and 67: section, using storage volume and i
- Page 68 and 69: Figure 20. Crack volume and drying
- Page 70 and 71: Figure 21. The relationshipbetween
- Page 72 and 73: epresentative, there should be no m
- Page 74 and 75: All of the curves are described by
- Page 76 and 77:
monitoring, precision levels, scali
- Page 78 and 79:
sites of significant recharge and d
- Page 80 and 81:
Figure 24. Degraded channelPart of
- Page 82 and 83:
and so depth estimates are inaccura
- Page 84 and 85:
Section 7:PredictingVegetationRespo
- Page 86 and 87:
AEAM and the Macquarie Marshes. An
- Page 88 and 89:
Category 3: hydraulic/empiricalAppr
- Page 90 and 91:
For example, changes in surface and
- Page 92 and 93:
ReferencesPrefaceArthington AH and
- Page 94 and 95:
Section 3Roberts J and Marston F (1
- Page 96 and 97:
Kunin WE and Gaston KG (1993). The
- Page 98 and 99:
Singh VP (1995).“Computer models
- Page 100 and 101:
Web ListingsNote 40Data on the WebM
- Page 102 and 103:
flood. This has not been attempted,
- Page 104 and 105:
Seven points over the flow range is
- Page 106 and 107:
used as exclusions; or can be quant
- Page 108 and 109:
Table A1 - 4. A flooding overlay ch
- Page 110:
Table A2 - 1.(cont’d) K c and K s