13.07.2015 Views

January 2011 - National Labor Relations Board

January 2011 - National Labor Relations Board

January 2011 - National Labor Relations Board

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

10140 NON-BOARD ADJUSTMENTS10140 Non-<strong>Board</strong> AdjustmentsIn addition to <strong>Board</strong> settlements, unfair labor practice charges may be resolvedthrough a specific agreement between the parties, including grievance settlements, or as aresult of unilateral action taken by the charged party which satisfies the charging party.Non-<strong>Board</strong> adjustments result in the withdrawal of the charge or, in limitedcircumstances, dismissal.10140.1 PolicyIt is well-established <strong>Board</strong> policy, consistent with the preamble of the Act, toencourage voluntary resolutions of disputes between employers and unions.Accordingly, the Regional Office should encourage the parties to resolve unfair laborpractice issues between themselves. However—and this is particularly important whererights of individuals are involved—the parties should be informed that any withdrawalrequest based upon such resolutions will be subject to the Regional Director’s approval.(a) The <strong>Board</strong>’s Established Factors: In Independent Stave Co., 287 NLRB 740(1987), the <strong>Board</strong> reconfirmed that the <strong>Board</strong>’s jurisdiction over settlement agreementsrequires it to enforce public interests, not private rights, and to reject private settlementsthat are repugnant to the Act or <strong>Board</strong> policy. Id. at 741. In view of Independent Stave,the Regional Office should consider, among other factors, whether: The settlement is reasonable in light of the alleged violation, the risksof litigating the issue, and the stage of litigation The charging party, the charged party, and the alleged discriminateeshave agreed to be bound Fraud, coercion, or duress were present The charged party has engaged in a history of violations of the Act orhas breached previous settlement agreements resolving unfair laborpractice disputes(b) The General Counsel’s Policy Considerations: In order to permit theRegional Office to exercise proper review pursuant to the policy set forth in IndependentStave Co., the <strong>Board</strong> agent should ordinarily obtain the terms of the non-<strong>Board</strong>adjustment in writing. The <strong>Board</strong> agent should also obtain the position of any allegeddiscriminatees and any other individuals or entities who may be adversely affected byapproval of the request for withdrawal of the charge. In addition to exercising a higherlevel of scrutiny in cases where a merit determination has already been made, the Regionshould generally not approve a withdrawal request based upon a non-<strong>Board</strong> adjustmentwhich: Includes a provision requiring an employee to release future rights,such as the right to file NLRB charges, with the exception that anemployee may knowingly waive the right to seek employment with anamed employer in the future.Revised 01/11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!