13.07.2015 Views

January 2011 - National Labor Relations Board

January 2011 - National Labor Relations Board

January 2011 - National Labor Relations Board

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

11802 PATTERN 51, APPLICATION FOR ORDER ENFORCING SUBPOENA AD TESTIFICANDUMrespondent is estopped from questioning the validity of the subpoena or the relevancy ofthe evidence requested. Such a contention was sustained in NLRB v. Frederick Cowan,522 F.2d 26, 28 (2d Cir. 1975); Maurice v. NLRB, 691 F.2d 182, 183 (4th Cir. 1982);American Motors v. FTC, 601 F.2d 1329, 1332–1337 (6th Cir. 1979). But see EEOC v.Cuzzins of Georgia, Inc., 608 F.2d 1062, 1063 (5th Cir. 1979) (constitutional defense notwaived); NLRB v. Midland Daily News, 151 F.3d 472, 474 (6th Cir. 1998) (same); NLRBv. Detroit News, 185 F.3d 602 (6th Cir. 1999) (privilege defenses not waived); EEOC v.Lutheran Social Services, 186 F.3d 959 (D.C. Cir. 1999) (strong presumption of need toexhaust administrative remedies is not jurisdictional and exhaustion requirements may bewaived by court in particular circumstances).(d) Petition to Revoke Denied: If respondent petitioned to revoke the subpoenaand the petition was denied, use paragraph d of Pattern 51. Paragraph e of Pattern 52alleges that respondent did not appear in answer to the subpoena.(e) Refusal to Testify or Produce Records: If respondent did appear at the hearingbut refused to testify or produce the required records, see paragraph e of Pattern 51.11802 Pattern 51, Application for Order Enforcing Subpoena ad TestificandumThis form is designed to be used where the subpoena issued at the request of aprivate party and was directed to an individual; for situations where the subpoena wasissued at the request of the General Counsel or where respondent is a corporation, seePattern 52 (Sec. 11804.1). (Whenever an ex rel. proceeding is brought, Pattern 54, whichis the notice to the relator or his attorney, should be used.)11802.1 Pattern 51IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEBRASKANATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARDON BEHALF OF LOCAL 1, UNITEDSQUIBB WORKERS OF AMERICA, U.S.W., IND.Applicantv. Civil No. 13579JOHN DOERespondentRevised 01/11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!