Multi Outcome Construction Policy (final report)

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Appendix A: Summary of interviews for percent for artStakeholdergroupInterviewee NumberDate ofinterviewType ofinterviewArt Coordinator Art Coordinator 1 June 2007 Face to faceArt Coordinator 2 June 2007 Face to faceArt Coordinator 3 June 2007 Face to faceArt Coordinator 4 November 2006 Face to faceArt Coordinator 5 November 2006 Face to faceArtist Artist 1 June 2007 Face to faceArtist 2 June 2007 Face to faceArtist 3 June 2007 Face to faceBuilding UserRepresentativeClientRepresentativeDHW ContractManagerBuilding user representative 1 June 2007 Face to faceBuilding user representative 2 June 2007 Face to faceBuilding user representative 3 June 2007 Face to faceClient representative 3 November 2006 Face to faceClient representative 4 November 2006 Face to faceClient representative 5 November 2006 Face to faceClient representative 6 November 2006 Face to faceClient representative 7 November 2006 Face to faceClient representative 1 June 2007 Face to faceClient representative 2 June 2007 Face to faceDHW contract manager 1 June 2007 Face to faceDHW contract manager 2 June 2007 Face to faceDHW contract manager 3 June 2007 Face to faceDHW contract manager 4 November 2006 Face to faceDHW contract manager 5 November 2006 Face to faceDHW Policy DHW Policy Officer 1 June 2007 Face to faceOfficerDHW Policy Officer 2 June 2007 Face to faceDHW Policy Officer 3 June 2007 Face to faceProject Architect Project Architect 1 June 2007 Face to faceThe following interviews have been conducted, however, at time of publication, feedbackis still been gained on the interviews in order to include their perspectives in the research.Art Coordinator Art Coordinator 6 November 2007 Face to FaceArt Coordinator 7 November 2007 Face to FaceArt Coordinator 8 November 2007 Face to FaceDWH PolicyOfficerDHW Policy Officer 4 November 2007 Face to Face169
Appendix B: Summary of interviews for Art Built-inStakeholdergroupInterviewee NumberDate ofinterviewType ofinterviewArtists Artist 1 November 2007 Face to faceArtist 2 December 2007 Face to faceArtist 3 December 2007 Face to faceArtist 4 December 2007 Face to faceArtist 5 December 2007 Face to faceClientRepresentativeClient Representative 1 November 2007 Face to faceClient Representative 2 November 2007 Face to faceClient Representative 3 December 2007 Face to faceClient Representative 4 December 2007 Face to faceClient Representative 5 December 2007 Face to faceCurators Curator 1 December 2007 Face to faceProject Managers DPW Project Manager 1 October 2007 Face to faceArts Queensland Policy Officers April 2008 Face to face170
Page 3 and 4:
Table of ContentsBackground .......
Page 5 and 6:
FiguresFigure 1: Total, Private, an
Page 7 and 8:
stakeholders involved in constructi
Page 9 and 10:
Project Objectives & ScopeThe prima
Page 11 and 12:
the review first identified the ‘
Page 13 and 14:
Social Policies Leveraged on Public
Page 15 and 16:
construction contracts that fall un
Page 17 and 18:
Similar to the Priority Access Poli
Page 19 and 20:
employ Aboriginal people, that supp
Page 21 and 22:
projects to address skills shortage
Page 23 and 24:
ecruited from the local community.
Page 25 and 26:
The contracting or delivering agenc
Page 28 and 29:
Literature ReviewEconomic Perspecti
Page 30 and 31:
innovations. These negotiations are
Page 32 and 33:
investments in general skills); and
Page 34 and 35:
Keeping this in mind, the following
Page 36 and 37:
previous section, this research app
Page 38 and 39:
Theoretical FrameworkThe theoretica
Page 40 and 41:
max{ B(e)− C(e)eThis has a unique
Page 42 and 43:
It is also useful to add a shift fa
Page 44 and 45:
opposite influence - acting as a de
Page 46 and 47:
component of the economic cost of t
Page 48 and 49:
Figure 2: Average Number of Tender
Page 50 and 51:
Figure 5: The Average Number of Ten
Page 52 and 53:
Figure 7: Tender Bids by Pre-Qualif
Page 54 and 55:
August 2002 (increasing by only 1.6
Page 56 and 57:
egion and project size) before focu
Page 58 and 59:
Figure 13: Average Number of Tender
Page 60 and 61:
areas as compared to less remote re
Page 62 and 63:
The results of this analysis are pr
Page 64 and 65:
the Building Skills Policy were not
Page 66 and 67:
The Training and Employment Policie
Page 68 and 69:
documentation. The Department’s k
Page 70 and 71:
And to achieve this objective, the
Page 72 and 73:
also claimed that tenders had been
Page 74 and 75:
Head ContractorsThe large sized con
Page 76 and 77:
The key policy officer in the spons
Page 78 and 79:
In summary, the information collect
Page 80 and 81:
aised the cost of construction proj
Page 82 and 83:
The Training and Employment Policie
Page 84 and 85:
commented that the 10% Training Pol
Page 86 and 87:
The sponsoring agency: DETAThe poli
Page 88 and 89:
competitive industry to operate in,
Page 90 and 91:
“There’s a disbenefit in taking
Page 92 and 93:
Several of the head contractors and
Page 94 and 95:
was defined as one were it was goin
Page 96 and 97:
However, he did link the policy to
Page 98 and 99:
The Provision of Public Art as a Pe
Page 100 and 101:
eport examines percent for art prog
Page 102 and 103:
…the big question with regard to
Page 104 and 105:
considered essential to ensure that
Page 106 and 107:
apparatus of public hygiene or of a
Page 108 and 109:
provide important economic benefits
Page 110 and 111:
‘new’ approaches to such contra
Page 112 and 113:
self education that the Artist must
Page 114 and 115:
Building user representative 1 stat
Page 116 and 117:
Costs according to DHW Policy Offic
Page 118 and 119:
Numerous interviewees noted that th
Page 120 and 121:
Additionally, the skill development
Page 122 and 123:
and so we have got a very nice outc
Page 124 and 125: The development of communication, p
Page 126 and 127: The majority of Building User Repre
Page 128 and 129: are all the same, and the Percent f
Page 130 and 131: vandalism on WA Percent for Art bui
Page 132 and 133: The major benefits achieved by the
Page 134 and 135: Stakeholder groupDHW contract manag
Page 136 and 137: The Art Built-In Policy of the Quee
Page 138 and 139: cover the concept design. The commi
Page 140 and 141: artwork and project management. Acc
Page 142 and 143: Moreover, according to the Intervie
Page 144 and 145: Benefits of the Art Built-in policy
Page 146 and 147: Public art can enrich public cultur
Page 148 and 149: 3 to discover skills that they had
Page 150 and 151: The artwork is able to increase pub
Page 152 and 153: Similar to the artwork’s ability
Page 154 and 155: potential. Also according to Client
Page 156 and 157: Multilayered artwork is able to be
Page 158 and 159: not be updated, as the artwork is a
Page 160 and 161: A number of benefits from the Art B
Page 162 and 163: administration and project manageme
Page 164 and 165: Those elements which were expected
Page 166 and 167: Globerman and Vining (1996) propose
Page 168 and 169: Table: WA Percent for Art policy an
Page 170 and 171: Summary of comparative analysisFigu
Page 172 and 173: concerning the art in buildings, th
Page 176 and 177: References“10% Training Policy”
Page 178 and 179: Hein, H. 1996. What is public art?:
Page 180: 175
show all

Multi Outcome Construction Policy (final report)

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?