References“10% Training <strong>Policy</strong>” for Queensland Government building and construction contracts n.d.Retrieved May 8, 2007, fromhttp://www.build.qld.gov.au/industry/industry05.asp#10tpAdams, D. and A. Goldbard. 1995. New Deal Cultural Programs: Experiments in CulturalDemocracy. Webster's World of Cultural Democracy.http://www.wwcd.org/policy/US/newdeal.html (accessed 8 December, 2006).Anderson, Peter. 1998. Against the 'plonk' approach to public art. [The bay of Mooloolaba, astructure created by two architects and a host of artists.] [online]. Artlink, v.18, no.2,June/ Aug 1998: 40-41. Availability:http://search.informit.com.au.ezp01.library.qut.edu.au/fullText;dn=981010813;res=APAFT ISSN: 0727-1239. [cited 18 Dec 07].APCC 2002. Client Skills: Skills required by Government as the <strong>Construction</strong> Industry Client.Canberra: APCC. Downloaded fromhttp://www.apcc.gov.au/docs/ClientSkillsSep2002.pdf on 10 February 2006.Armajani, S. 2004. Public art and the city. In Public art: a reader, ed. F. Matzner, 67-71.Ostfildern-Ruit, Germany: Hatje Cantz.Artz, K.W. and Brush, T.H. 2000. Asset specificity, uncertainty and relational norms:anexamination of coordination costs in collaborative strategic alliances. Journal ofEconomic Behavior and Organization Vol. 41, pp, 337–362.Baxter, M. 1995. The continuing march of Western Australian sculpture. [Review ofSculpture Survey 1995 at the Gomboc Gallery and One Hundred Years of Sculpture1895/ 1995 at the Art Gallery of Western Australia.] [online]. Artlink, v.15, nos 2-3,Winter-Spring 1995: 96-99.Baxter, M. 1998. Good or bad idea?: The community as public art practitioner: Artists cannotany longer be expected to work with the community unless there is a realistic timeframe and budget. Artlink, 18 (2): 73-75.Becker, G. 1975. Human Capital. 2nd ed. New York: National Bureau of EconomicResearch.Bennett, J. & Iossa, E. 2005, ‘Building and Managing Facilities for Public Service’, WorkingPaper Series No. 05/137, Centre for Market and Public Organisation, University ofBristol.Beunders, H. 2007. The end of arrogance, the advent of persuasion: Public Art in a <strong>Multi</strong>-Cultural Society Social Analysis 51(1), pp.42–57.Blom-Hansen, J. 2003, ‘Is private delivery of public services really cheaper? Evidence frompublic road maintenance in Denmark, Public Choice, Vol. 115: 419-438.Brecknock, R. 1992. Public Art – Public Places – Public Money Culture and <strong>Policy</strong> Volume4. http://web.archive.org/web/20020805113105/www.gu.edu.au/centre/cmp/4-07-Brecknock.html accessed on 20 December 2007,Buy Local <strong>Policy</strong>. Retrieved October 20, 2006, fromhttp://www.ssc.wa.gov.au/procurement03.aps.Carver, R. 1989, ‘Examining the Premises of Contracting Out’, Public Productivity &Management Review’, Vol. 13, No. 2: 27-40.Coakley, L. 2007. ‘Sea, Sail, Steam and Emigration’: The imagining of a heritage tourist townin the Republic of Ireland Geography Vol 92(1), pp.13–24. Accessed fromhttp://www.geography.org.uk/download/Geog%20Spr%2007%20Journal.pdf on 18December 2007.Demirag, I. 2004. “Towards Better Governance and Accountability: Exploring theRelationships between the Public, Private and the Community” Journal of CorporateCitizenship, 15: 19 – 26.171
Department of Housing and Works (DHW) 2005. . Department of Housing and WorksAnnual Report 2004-05. Retrieved October 18, 2006, fromhttp://www.dha.wa.gov.au.Department of Culture and the Arts (2003) Integrating Views: A review of the stategovernment’s percent for art scheme. Perth: Department of Culture and the Arts.Department of the Arts. 1990. A Strategy for Public Art 1988-1990. Ministerial Task Forceon Public Art. Western Australian Government.Department of the Arts (WA) 1993. A review and evaluation of process and some strategiesfor the nineties. In A strategy for public art development in WA: The story so far, ed.P. A. Taskforce. Perth, Western Australia.DHW 2006. . Retrieved October 18, 2006, from http://www.dhw.wa.gov.au/585_412.asp.Domberger, S. & Jensen, P. 1997, ‘Contracting out by the Public Sector: Theory, Evidence,Prospects’, Oxford Review of Economic <strong>Policy</strong>, 13(4): 67-78.Edwards, F. & Stevens, B. 1978, ‘The Provision of Municipal Sanitation Services by PrivateFirms: An Empirical Analysis of the Efficiency of Alternative Market Structures andRegulatory Arrangements’, The Journal of Industrial Economics’, 27(2):133-147.Ehrenburg, R. and Smith, R. 2005. Modern Labour Economics: Theory and Public <strong>Policy</strong>. 9thed. Boston: Pearson EducationErridge, A. and Greer, J. 2002. Partnerships and public procurement: Building social capitalthrough supply chain relations. Public Administration Vol. 80(3), pp. 503-522.Fleming, R. L. and M. T. Goldman. 2005. Public art for the public. Public Interest, Spring2005 (159): 55-76.Frey, B.S. 1999. State support and creativity in the arts: Some new considerations Journal ofCultural Economics 23, pp. 71–85.Furneaux, C.W., Brown, K.A., Allan, D., McConville, S., McFallan, S., London, K. andBurgess, J. 2006. “Client capabilities and capital works procurement policies: Acomparative analysis of Australian jurisdictions” in Brown, K., K. Hampson and P.Brandon. Clients Driving <strong>Construction</strong> Innovation: Moving Ideas into Practice.Brisbane: Cooperative Research Centre for <strong>Construction</strong> Innovation, Icon.Net PtyLtd:. 62 – 71Gablik, S. 1995. Connective Aesthetics: Art After Individualism. In Mapping the terrain :new genre public art, ed. S. Lacy, 74-87. Seattle Wash: Bay Press.Globerman, S. & Vining, A. 1996, ‘A Framework for Evaluating the GovernmentContracting-Out Decision with an Application to Information Technology ’, PublicAdministration Review, 56(6): 557-586.Goldblatt, J. and Perry, J. 2002. Re-building the Community with Fire, Water, and Music:The WaterFire Phenomenon UTS: Event Research Conference 15 to 16 July 2002,Sydney, pp. 539–563. Accessed fromhttp://www.acem.uts.edu.au/pdfs/Proceedings.pdf on 18 December 2007.Gooding, M. 1998. Public art: space: Introductory essay. In Public--art--space : a decade ofPublic Art Commissions Agency, 1987-1997, ed. M. Gooding, 13-20. London:Merrell Holberton.Gopnik, A. 2005. Introduction: Art in the city. In City art : New York's Percent for ArtProgram, ed. M. Heiferman., 9-13. London ; New York: Merrell.Hall, T and Robertson, I. (2001) Public Art and Urban Regeneration: advocacy, claims andcritical debates Landscape Research Vol. 26(1), 5-26.Hampson, K & Brandon, P. 2004. <strong>Construction</strong> 2020: A Vision for Australia’s Property and<strong>Construction</strong> Industry, Brisbane: Cooperative Research Centre for <strong>Construction</strong>Innovation.Hart, O, Shleifer, A. & Vishny, R. 1997, ‘The Proper Scope of Government: Theory and anApplication to Prisons’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics: 1127-1161.Heartney, E. 2005. The city as laboratory: Two decades of New York's percent for artprogram. In City art : New York's Percent for Art Program, ed. M. Heiferman, 15-23.London ; New York: Merrell.172
- Page 3 and 4:
Table of ContentsBackground .......
- Page 5 and 6:
FiguresFigure 1: Total, Private, an
- Page 7 and 8:
stakeholders involved in constructi
- Page 9 and 10:
Project Objectives & ScopeThe prima
- Page 11 and 12:
the review first identified the ‘
- Page 13 and 14:
Social Policies Leveraged on Public
- Page 15 and 16:
construction contracts that fall un
- Page 17 and 18:
Similar to the Priority Access Poli
- Page 19 and 20:
employ Aboriginal people, that supp
- Page 21 and 22:
projects to address skills shortage
- Page 23 and 24:
ecruited from the local community.
- Page 25 and 26:
The contracting or delivering agenc
- Page 28 and 29:
Literature ReviewEconomic Perspecti
- Page 30 and 31:
innovations. These negotiations are
- Page 32 and 33:
investments in general skills); and
- Page 34 and 35:
Keeping this in mind, the following
- Page 36 and 37:
previous section, this research app
- Page 38 and 39:
Theoretical FrameworkThe theoretica
- Page 40 and 41:
max{ B(e)− C(e)eThis has a unique
- Page 42 and 43:
It is also useful to add a shift fa
- Page 44 and 45:
opposite influence - acting as a de
- Page 46 and 47:
component of the economic cost of t
- Page 48 and 49:
Figure 2: Average Number of Tender
- Page 50 and 51:
Figure 5: The Average Number of Ten
- Page 52 and 53:
Figure 7: Tender Bids by Pre-Qualif
- Page 54 and 55:
August 2002 (increasing by only 1.6
- Page 56 and 57:
egion and project size) before focu
- Page 58 and 59:
Figure 13: Average Number of Tender
- Page 60 and 61:
areas as compared to less remote re
- Page 62 and 63:
The results of this analysis are pr
- Page 64 and 65:
the Building Skills Policy were not
- Page 66 and 67:
The Training and Employment Policie
- Page 68 and 69:
documentation. The Department’s k
- Page 70 and 71:
And to achieve this objective, the
- Page 72 and 73:
also claimed that tenders had been
- Page 74 and 75:
Head ContractorsThe large sized con
- Page 76 and 77:
The key policy officer in the spons
- Page 78 and 79:
In summary, the information collect
- Page 80 and 81:
aised the cost of construction proj
- Page 82 and 83:
The Training and Employment Policie
- Page 84 and 85:
commented that the 10% Training Pol
- Page 86 and 87:
The sponsoring agency: DETAThe poli
- Page 88 and 89:
competitive industry to operate in,
- Page 90 and 91:
“There’s a disbenefit in taking
- Page 92 and 93:
Several of the head contractors and
- Page 94 and 95:
was defined as one were it was goin
- Page 96 and 97:
However, he did link the policy to
- Page 98 and 99:
The Provision of Public Art as a Pe
- Page 100 and 101:
eport examines percent for art prog
- Page 102 and 103:
…the big question with regard to
- Page 104 and 105:
considered essential to ensure that
- Page 106 and 107:
apparatus of public hygiene or of a
- Page 108 and 109:
provide important economic benefits
- Page 110 and 111:
‘new’ approaches to such contra
- Page 112 and 113:
self education that the Artist must
- Page 114 and 115:
Building user representative 1 stat
- Page 116 and 117:
Costs according to DHW Policy Offic
- Page 118 and 119:
Numerous interviewees noted that th
- Page 120 and 121:
Additionally, the skill development
- Page 122 and 123:
and so we have got a very nice outc
- Page 124 and 125:
The development of communication, p
- Page 126 and 127: The majority of Building User Repre
- Page 128 and 129: are all the same, and the Percent f
- Page 130 and 131: vandalism on WA Percent for Art bui
- Page 132 and 133: The major benefits achieved by the
- Page 134 and 135: Stakeholder groupDHW contract manag
- Page 136 and 137: The Art Built-In Policy of the Quee
- Page 138 and 139: cover the concept design. The commi
- Page 140 and 141: artwork and project management. Acc
- Page 142 and 143: Moreover, according to the Intervie
- Page 144 and 145: Benefits of the Art Built-in policy
- Page 146 and 147: Public art can enrich public cultur
- Page 148 and 149: 3 to discover skills that they had
- Page 150 and 151: The artwork is able to increase pub
- Page 152 and 153: Similar to the artwork’s ability
- Page 154 and 155: potential. Also according to Client
- Page 156 and 157: Multilayered artwork is able to be
- Page 158 and 159: not be updated, as the artwork is a
- Page 160 and 161: A number of benefits from the Art B
- Page 162 and 163: administration and project manageme
- Page 164 and 165: Those elements which were expected
- Page 166 and 167: Globerman and Vining (1996) propose
- Page 168 and 169: Table: WA Percent for Art policy an
- Page 170 and 171: Summary of comparative analysisFigu
- Page 172 and 173: concerning the art in buildings, th
- Page 174 and 175: Appendix A: Summary of interviews f
- Page 178 and 179: Hein, H. 1996. What is public art?:
- Page 180: 175