03.12.2012 Views

Premenstrual Syndromes : PMS and PMDD - Rutuja :: The site ...

Premenstrual Syndromes : PMS and PMDD - Rutuja :: The site ...

Premenstrual Syndromes : PMS and PMDD - Rutuja :: The site ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

42 THE PREMENSTRUAL SYNDROMES<br />

health provider visits than controls. 57 Further analysis<br />

demonstrated that women with <strong>PMS</strong> were 2–3 times<br />

more likely to miss at least 2 days of work per month<br />

<strong>and</strong> were 4–6 times more likely to report at least a 50%<br />

reduction in work productivity compared with women<br />

without <strong>PMS</strong>. 58 Women with <strong>PMS</strong> in both cycles showed<br />

significantly greater decrease in work productivity compared<br />

to women with one cycle of <strong>PMS</strong> <strong>and</strong> women not<br />

meeting <strong>PMS</strong> criteria. Women who met criteria for <strong>PMS</strong><br />

in one or both cycles were significantly more likely to<br />

use calcium, vitamins, <strong>and</strong> other non-prescription<br />

medications (p � 0.02), <strong>and</strong> to use antidepressants,<br />

antianxiety medications, <strong>and</strong> other prescription medications<br />

(p � 0.03) for premenstrual symptoms than<br />

controls. 58<br />

<strong>The</strong> largest data available describing the functioning<br />

<strong>and</strong> quality of life in women with prospectively confirmed<br />

<strong>PMDD</strong> comes from women presenting for multi<strong>site</strong><br />

clinical trials. Although women with <strong>PMDD</strong> seeking<br />

treatment may not be the same as women with <strong>PMDD</strong><br />

in the community who do not seek treatment, the baseline<br />

evaluation of women seeking treatment in these<br />

studies has been systematic <strong>and</strong> comprehensive. In<br />

addition to baseline assessments, recent treatment trials<br />

have also examined the effect of treatment on functioning<br />

<strong>and</strong> quality of life as secondary outcome measures.<br />

Fluoxetine trials<br />

<strong>The</strong> largest multi<strong>site</strong> fluoxetine trial assessed the diagnosis<br />

of late luteal phase dysphoric disorder (now <strong>PMDD</strong>)<br />

with VAS in 313 women. 59 In later analyses, 8 items<br />

from the <strong>Premenstrual</strong> Tension Syndrome – Self Report 60<br />

corresponding to work functioning were examined in<br />

304 women. 61 At baseline, each of the 8 items were<br />

endorsed by a significantly larger percent of women<br />

during the luteal phase than in the follicular phase (each<br />

p � 0.001). Both fluoxetine 20 mg daily <strong>and</strong> 60 mg daily<br />

for 6 months were significantly better than placebo in<br />

improving the 8-item summed score, <strong>and</strong> the improvement<br />

occurred during the first cycle of treatment.<br />

A multi<strong>site</strong> study compared luteal-phase fluoxetine<br />

20 mg, fluoxetine 10 mg, <strong>and</strong> placebo in 260 women<br />

with <strong>PMDD</strong> diagnosed with the DRSP. 62 Both 20 mg<br />

(p � 0.033) <strong>and</strong> 10 mg (p � 0.021) fluoxetine for three<br />

cycles were significantly superior to placebo in improving<br />

the three DRSP functioning items. Another multi<strong>site</strong><br />

study compared fluoxetine 90 mg administered 14<br />

<strong>and</strong> 7 days before expected menses, placebo 14 days<br />

before, <strong>and</strong> fluoxetine 90 mg 7 days before expected<br />

menses, <strong>and</strong> placebo both 14 <strong>and</strong> 7 days before expected<br />

menses in 257 women with <strong>PMDD</strong> diagnosed with the<br />

DRSP. 63 <strong>The</strong> work, social life, <strong>and</strong> family life subscales<br />

of the SDS at luteal baseline were 4.8–5.2, 5.2–5.5, <strong>and</strong><br />

5.5–6.0, respectively, in the three treatment groups.<br />

<strong>The</strong> administration of fluoxetine 90 mg twice weekly<br />

before expected menses, but not once before expected<br />

menses, was significantly superior to placebo on improving<br />

the work (p � 0.001), social life (p � 0.037), <strong>and</strong><br />

family life (p � 0.005) scores of the SDS <strong>and</strong> the sum of<br />

the three DRSP functioning items (p � 0.035). A crossover<br />

study of flexible-dose fluoxetine <strong>and</strong> placebo, each<br />

administered for three cycles, in 20 women with<br />

<strong>PMDD</strong> reported superiority of fluoxetine over placebo<br />

for a compo<strong>site</strong> social isolation <strong>and</strong> work efficiency<br />

score. 64<br />

Sertraline trials<br />

A recent study 41 reported on a post-hoc analysis of the<br />

pretreatment Q-LES-Q scores of 437 women with<br />

prospectively confirmed <strong>PMDD</strong> by DRSP ratings who<br />

had participated in clinical trials of sertraline treatment.<br />

65,66 <strong>The</strong> sum of items 1–14 correlated with the<br />

overall satisfaction <strong>and</strong> contentment item 16 (r � 0.78,<br />

p � 0.0001), suggesting that the broad set of functioning<br />

domains assessed by the Q-LES-Q individual items<br />

are related to the overall sense of quality of life. Thirtyone<br />

percent of women with <strong>PMDD</strong> were considered to<br />

have severe quality of life impairment, defined as two<br />

or more st<strong>and</strong>ard deviations below the community<br />

norm. Illness-specific symptom measures accounted for<br />

26% of the variance in quality of life for women with<br />

<strong>PMDD</strong>, suggesting that quality of life assessment should<br />

be part of the diagnostic evaluation <strong>and</strong> treatment plan<br />

for women with <strong>PMDD</strong> in addition to specific premenstrual<br />

symptoms. 41<br />

Three studies have reported on the effect of sertraline<br />

<strong>and</strong> placebo on the functioning <strong>and</strong> quality of life in 243<br />

women with <strong>PMDD</strong> who participated in a multi<strong>site</strong><br />

trial of daily flexible-dose sertraline for three cycles. 65<br />

Functioning was assessed by the SAS <strong>and</strong> the three<br />

DRSP items during the follicular <strong>and</strong> luteal phases at<br />

baseline <strong>and</strong> during the luteal phase of each treatment<br />

cycle. Quality of life was assessed with the Q-LES-Q at<br />

baseline <strong>and</strong> during each treatment cycle. <strong>The</strong> initial<br />

study reported that sertraline was significantly superior<br />

to placebo in improving functioning as measured by the<br />

three DRSP functioning items <strong>and</strong> the SAS scores. 65<br />

Pearlstein <strong>and</strong> colleagues further examined the data. 67<br />

Significant luteal phase impairment was evident compared<br />

with the follicular phase during the baseline cycle<br />

on the total <strong>and</strong> factor SAS scores, <strong>and</strong> on items 1–14<br />

<strong>and</strong> the overall assessment score of the Q-LES-Q (all<br />

p � 0.001). Overall, the luteal impairment noted<br />

with SAS total <strong>and</strong> factor scores was similar to<br />

cohorts of women with dysthymia, but milder than<br />

women with MDD. Significant improvement with

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!