04.12.2012 Views

Acute Aortic Disease.. - Index of

Acute Aortic Disease.. - Index of

Acute Aortic Disease.. - Index of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Classification <strong>of</strong> <strong>Aortic</strong> Dissection 17<br />

Figure 9 Imminent malperfusion syndrome in an initially stable patient emerging as<br />

complicated type B dissection with invagination <strong>of</strong> the dissecting lamella into celiac trunk<br />

(left) and true lumen collapse from systemic pressure in the false lumen (right).<br />

(“the deadly triad”) should be taken into consideration for risk assessment and<br />

decision-making (40,41,74).<br />

Complicated vs. Noncomplicated Dissection<br />

Another clinically useful way to stratify is to differentiate between complicated<br />

and uncomplicated dissection, regardless <strong>of</strong> both the time elapsed since onset <strong>of</strong><br />

dissection and proximity <strong>of</strong> the dissected segments <strong>of</strong> the aorta. Any proximal<br />

aortic dissection deserves an ultimate effort to save the life <strong>of</strong> the patient.<br />

An assessment <strong>of</strong> impending risk regardless <strong>of</strong> swift surgery is possible by use <strong>of</strong><br />

the IRAD risk prediction model as illustrated in Figure 8. The clinical features<br />

listed in Figure 8 are associated with scoring points and add up to a risk prediction<br />

score that allows a realistic assessment <strong>of</strong> individual prognosis in proximal dissection<br />

(75). The modelled probability <strong>of</strong> death is closely reflected in the observed<br />

in-hospital mortality <strong>of</strong> proximal dissection cases.<br />

Even more clinically applicable is the distinction between complicated and<br />

uncomplicated type B dissections. A recent analysis from the IRAD group identified<br />

variables in type B dissection associated with increased risk <strong>of</strong> in-hospital<br />

mortality that may help clinicians in risk stratification and decision-making<br />

(Table 5). Type B dissection is generally associated with a more favourable<br />

outcome (short- and mid-term) than type A lesions, but decision-making may be<br />

more complex due to an emerging variety <strong>of</strong> treatment options. In contrast to<br />

type A dissection, which requires surgical attention even in uncomplicated cases,<br />

medical management with antihypertensive and cardiac output suppressing<br />

drugs is currently the preferred strategy in uncomplicated type B dissection.<br />

Complicated type B lesions (contained rupture, malperfusion from compromised<br />

side branches, rapid enlargement) have traditionally required open surgical repair,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!