13.07.2015 Views

20 - Year Growth Plan - City of Kendleton

20 - Year Growth Plan - City of Kendleton

20 - Year Growth Plan - City of Kendleton

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2.3 Public Outreach - Second MeetingAt the final community outreach meeting on November 19, <strong>20</strong>11 EHRA coalesced theopinions, comments, visions and goals into a series <strong>of</strong> visual preference exhibits. 33guests were in attendance and listened as EHRA presented a slideshow describing howthe visual preference survey will affect the outcome <strong>of</strong> the <strong>20</strong>-<strong>Year</strong> <strong>Growth</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>. TheAttendees again used the marker voting method to provide feedback on what styles andelements would create the kind <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kendleton</strong> envisioned by the CPT and residentspreviously.Figure 2-9: November 19, <strong>20</strong>11 public outreach meeting photosAs shown in Table 2-C, the visual preference survey voting results indicate that thecommunity desires walkable streets versus the look <strong>of</strong> strip retail, a natural landscapefeel, and prominent public art displays.Table 2-C: Visual Preference Survey ResultsDowntown StreetscapeWalkable streets (pedestrian scale, benches, low-rise buildings) 47%Transit/Commercial oriented streets (easy access parking, suburban style shops) 53%NeighborhoodsLow Density (single family homes, large lots ) 67%Medium Density (single family homes, suburban style) 14%High Density (apartments) 19%Manufactured Homes 0%LandscapingNatural setting (tree and shrub groupings, taller native plants versus mowed areas) 47%Park-like (somewhat manicured, treed walkways) 53%Parks and ActivitiesOutdoor Festival oriented activities preferred using existing parks.Public Art and Museums“Old-town” feel desired strongly over urban style. Murals desired strongly over individual artworks.Throughout the public outreach process EHRA collected input from meeting attendeesby written response as well. During sit-down meetings, either with individualstakeholders or CPT members, such feedback was obtained in meeting notes. Duringpublic outreach meetings, group exercises resulted in cataloguing bulleted/condensedfeedback performed by the facilitators and comment sheets were solicited at the end <strong>of</strong>each meeting. Appendix B contains this feedback and illustrates the breadth <strong>of</strong> visionthat the community considered. Many <strong>of</strong> these ideas and suggestions have becomegoals with corresponding action items and are discussed in Section 11.<strong>20</strong>-<strong>Year</strong> <strong>Growth</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> 9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!