Section 3.0 Community Assessment3.3 Population Estimate and ProjectionAccording to the <strong>20</strong>10 Census, <strong>Kendleton</strong>’s current population within its corporate limitsis 380 and has an estimated population <strong>of</strong> 473 within its ETJ. Compared to Fort BendCounty, Texas, and the United States, <strong>Kendleton</strong> sees the largest percentage change inpopulation between <strong>20</strong>10 and <strong>20</strong>40 as shown in Table 3-A. However, this does notnecessarily mean <strong>Kendleton</strong> will grow the most or the fastest. With a projectedpopulation <strong>of</strong> about 1,500 by <strong>20</strong>40, <strong>Kendleton</strong> will hopefully retain elements <strong>of</strong> itsagricultural character, despite larger population increases elsewhere.Table 3-A. <strong>Kendleton</strong> Population Estimate and Projection<strong>Kendleton</strong> 1 Fort Bend County 2 Texas 3 US 4<strong>Year</strong> Forecast %ChangeForecast %ChangeForecast %ChangeForecast %Change<strong>20</strong>10 473 509,645 22,802,983 310,232,863<strong>20</strong>15 566 19.7% 584,531 14.7% 23,625,653 3.6% 325,539,790 4.9%<strong>20</strong><strong>20</strong> 722 27.6% 668,680 14.4% 24,330,687 3.0% 341,386,665 4.9%<strong>20</strong>25 938 29.9% 757,1<strong>20</strong> 13.2% 24,942,836 2.5% 357,451,6<strong>20</strong> 4.7%<strong>20</strong>30 1,236 31.8% 847,630 12.0% 25,449,114 2.0% 373,503,674 4.5%<strong>20</strong>35 1,647 33.2% 935,102 10.3% 25,830,944 1.5% 389,531,156 4.3%Sources:1234Please see Appendix C. Population Estimate and ForecastHouston-Galveston Area Council (H-GAC)Texas State Data CenterUS Census3.4 PerceptionsDuring the public outreach and interview portions <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Growth</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>, it becameapparent that perceptions regarding <strong>Kendleton</strong> vary greatly between residents and nonresidents.Although such generalizations may not be fair, it is clear that residents andbusiness owners in <strong>Kendleton</strong> regard the <strong>City</strong> in a positive light while admitting thatmuch work needs to be done to achieve a greater future. For example, many residentsdescribe <strong>Kendleton</strong> as a great place to raise children and as a community made up <strong>of</strong>hard working individuals. Many fears also exist about what will happen to <strong>Kendleton</strong> asthe Intermodal Center grows and new residents move in to <strong>Kendleton</strong> from other areas.Current residents wonder about the resulting property values and whether or notresidents could be “priced out” <strong>of</strong> their homes and property. Such perceptions andconcerns must be addressed through protective codes allowing equitable use <strong>of</strong>property.Conversely, non-residents tended to regard <strong>Kendleton</strong> as simply a farming communitywith little prospects for future growth. Addressing this perception will likely change withtime as the Intermodal Center grows. <strong>Kendleton</strong> can potentially capitalize on this growthby <strong>of</strong>fering services which cater to both residents and new business. Additionally, theproximity <strong>of</strong> farm land in and around <strong>Kendleton</strong> could become a known and desiredcommodity. The recent desire for farm-fresh produce has been evidenced by the growth<strong>of</strong> local farmer’s markets as an alternative to suburban grocery stores. This trend couldwork to <strong>Kendleton</strong>’s advantage if a Farmer’s Market were created within the <strong>City</strong>, thus18 <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kendleton</strong>
creating a destination for surrounding communities to visit <strong>Kendleton</strong> and an opportunityenhance the local economy.Until very recently, there were more than a few dilapidated structures, especially nearUS 59 and Loop 541, which contributed to an overall unkempt feel. These structureswere highly visible and contributed to a perception that the city was in a state <strong>of</strong>decline. In partnership with Fort Bend County and nearby religious organizations, as wellas efforts such as “Keep <strong>Kendleton</strong> Beautiful”, many <strong>of</strong> these structures have beenremoved or renovated. The result is that travelers on the major arteries no longer seeundesirable properties and several homes are now able to be occupied. Thus, in general,the condition <strong>of</strong> the majority <strong>of</strong> streets and homes are good and indicative <strong>of</strong> the hardwork the community has invested.Unfortunately there are two very prominent locations which continue to exhibit the kind<strong>of</strong> deterioration that the <strong>City</strong> does not want to be known for. The northwest corner <strong>of</strong>US 59 frontage road and FM 2919 was the location <strong>of</strong> a gas station and restaurant whichclosed for business and burned over a decade ago. Today, only the pump islandcanopies still exist and are in a dilapidated state. The site itself is being remediated forground water contamination issues even though the underground fuel storage tankshave long since been removed. First sampled in 1996 and again in <strong>20</strong>00, workcommenced in <strong>20</strong>05 to begin removal <strong>of</strong> gasoline which is floating on top <strong>of</strong> thegroundwater. Remediation visits occur on a quarterly basis and no timetable forcomplete remediation is known. Redevelopment <strong>of</strong> the site will likely not occur until thesite receives a closure letter from the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.Figure 3-14: Former gas stationand Hilltop Restaurant site at thecorner <strong>of</strong> US 59 and FM 2919.The other location in need <strong>of</strong> attention is the <strong>City</strong>’s King-Kennedy Memorial Park site.Dedicated in 1989, the park’s entry feature is seriously deteriorating and the roads arein very poor condition within the park. The constructed lake is <strong>of</strong>ten completely dry,leaving very few park features with any value to the community. The <strong>City</strong> has plans forthe park’s rehabilitation as discussed in Section 9.<strong>20</strong>-<strong>Year</strong> <strong>Growth</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> 19