The Reptile House at the Bronx Zoo was one of the first buildingsto be constructed in the newly chartered New York ZoologicalPark. Opened to the public in 1898, the Reptile House wasimmediately of immense popularity with the general public. CuratorRaymond L. Ditmars (1899–1942) wrote in the zoologicalsociety’s fifth annual report for 1900: “The Reptile House is permanentlyfixed in the minds of visitors as a center of attraction,”and “All things considered, the alligator pool is perhaps the satisfactorysingle feature in the Reptile House” (anon., 1898, 1900).Fig. 1. shows the original floorplan of the Reptile House as it wasconstructed in 1898, in a spacious, state-of-the-art, modern buildingof the times (Fig. 2). To this day, the exterior of the reptilehouse remains much as it was originally constructed, a sturdy structureof steel and dense, fire-kilned brick. Its roofline and cornicesare festooned with the sculptured cement heads of reptiles andamphibians to mark the presence of its scaly inhabitants. Thesewere especially created by the well known animal sculptor of thetime, Mr. A. P. Proctor. The alligator pools at the west end of thebuilding were designed to be main attractions and meant to houseonly American Alligators (Fig. 3).Ditmars was well aware that a constant warm environment wasessential to the health of crocodilians. He had insisted that heatingpipes carrying warm water, immersed along the perimeter of thealligator pools to maintain pool water temperatures in the range of27–30°C, be included in the construction of the 1898 building.The Most Beautiful Reptile House in the WorldFIG. 2. The Reptile House at the Bronx Zoo as it appeared in 1898.West pools conservatory is to the left.out of curiosity as ferocious potential man-eaters. It was generallyheld, even by the curatorial staff, that as crocodilians inhabitedthe warm tropical and sub-tropical wetlands of the world, theycould be exhibited only at considerable cost in space and utilitiesif they were to be kept alive at all, especially in northern climates.Certainly, they would not reproduce.A House for Reptiles in New York CityThe Reptile House remained largely unaltered until 1954, when,under the curatorship of Dr. James A. Oliver (1951–1958), it underwentits first renovation and modernization. Oliver’s article inAnimal Kingdom was aptly titled, “The most beautiful reptile housein the world” (Oliver 1954). The curved glass-walled conservatorycan still be seen, designed to allow the overhead sunlight tobrighten the alligator pools and their luxuriant plantings at thewest end of the Reptile House (Fig. 4). Oliver’s designs for therenovated reptile house advanced the heated pool concept and includeda state-of-the art heating system for all of the reptile exhibits,with heated concrete slabs for basking crocodilians. An opennursery with an unobstructed view of juvenile crocodilians wasadded to the major exhibits, to exhibit the many public donationsof alligators. Visitors were treated to a frenzy of crocodilian activityas the keeper staff provided regular feeding demonstrationsseveral times a week (Fig. 5). True to the original concept, therenovated Reptile House exhibited only adult American Alligators,Alligator mississippiensis, in the center main pool. However,the east end of the Reptile House now included a spacious crocodileexhibit, patterned after an Egyptian tomb, and a doorwaypainted with pictograms taken from the Book of the Dead, attributedto Sobk, the Egyptian crocodile god, son of Neith (Faulkner1985). The exhibit housed a single 3.7 m long Nile Crocodile,Crocodylus niloticus, named “Joe.” The public would be greetedby a bevy of large alligators in a tropical setting as they enteredthe reptile house and leave with the image of a fearsome maneatingcrocodile. While the 1954 Reptile House included a nursery forrearing baby crocodilians, a main pool designed to exhibit a fewspectacular animals, and two smaller flanking pools for exhibitingspecial species of interest, there was still no provision for breedingcrocodilians, incubating a potentially large number of eggs, orhousing a multi-species collection of crocodilians of various sizesand life stages.The Early Bronx Zoo CollectionFIG. 3. Alligator pools in the conservatory at the west end of the reptilehouse in 1900.The 1900 annual report lists two species of crocodilians in thereptile collection. In September, 1899, Ditmars specifically calledattention to the rapid growth of a 395 cm long alligator (Ditmars1900) (Fig. 6). However, it is unclear how extensive a plan therewas for increasing the diversity of crocodilian species in the BronxZoo collections between 1898 and the first major renovation in1954. In the original zoo plan, there was some limited space for138 <strong>Herpetological</strong> <strong>Review</strong> 39(2), 2008
small crocodilians but only two primary exhibit pools and no holdingenclosures for larger animals. The exhibition of American Alligatorsin the main pool was an absolute given, while the acquisitionof crocodilians of other species was most often one of chancerather than of design. Crocodilians, like all reptiles, were freelyavailable in the exotic pet trade to anyone who might wish such apet. Inevitably, if the pet survived poor care, it might be broughtto the Reptile House as a donation. Such donations were commonplace,were routinely accepted, and were added to the collectionwithout medical quarantine or concern for possible infectiousdiseases.Ditmars proudly wrote in 1913 that the crocodile nursery displayeda mound of baby American Alligators, brought to the zooby tourists who had vacationed in Florida, and a few crocodiles.By then, he reported that the collection included a number of rarespecies that included the Indian Gharial, Gavialis gangeticus;Senegal Crocodile (West African Slender-snouted Crocodile),Crocodylus cataphractus; Salt Marsh Crocodile (Saltwater Crocodile),Crocodylus porosus; Orinoco Crocodile, Crocodylus intermedius;American Crocodile, Crocodylus acutus; West AfricanBroad-nosed Crocodile, Osteolaemus tetraspis; and Rough-eyedCaiman (spectacled caiman), Caiman crocodilus, as well as AmericanAlligators (Ditmars 1913). Ditmars eloquently wrote of hisvisit to a ship, “a big freighter from the east,” in New York harbor,whose holds were crammed with cages and boxes of large cats,hoofed stock, giant snakes, and crocodiles in long boxes, of whichhe purchased three. Ditmars did not have easy access to the scholarlyliterature, and had to depend on the dealers’ anecdotal informationfor origin and species when he purchased animals for thezoo collections. We know that C. Ralph DeSola (1933) publisheda comprehensive article on crocodilians in the Zoological SocietyBulletin, with a foreword by Ditmars, that suggested that a numberof crocodilian species were on hand, and that the general philosophyamong zoological institutions of the period was to outcompeteeach other by virtue of the number and rarity of speciesthey exhibited. An outdoor pool located immediately to the east ofthe Reptile House, useable for crocodilians only during warm summermonths, is shown to contain a number of basking animals,including several alligators and a crocodile (Fig. 7).FIG. 4. The west alligator pools as they appeared in 1954, after the firstreptile house renovation since 1898. The modernized configuration andsupporting columns remain true to the original 1898 floor plan. The centerpool houses four large alligators. Two smaller pools, designed to holdsmaller crocodilians, lie just out of sight to the left and right. The largealligators were replaced with a multi-species group in the early 1960s.No good record-keeping system for the reptile collection existeduntil 1964. Records included a small box of index cards onthe head keeper’s desk, with a card for each animal marked #1, 2,3, etc. within each species. Should #2 die, the next animal of thatspecies to arrive would assume the position of #2. Thus, it is retroactivelyimpossible to track longevity of any individual animalwithin the collection other than, perhaps, an animal that mighthave some special notoriety attached to it. Herndon G. Dowlingassumed the department curatorship in 1958 (1958–1966) and sooninitiated a museum-based system of records keeping that includedthe permanent marking of individual animals for identification anda system of cataloging the collections (Dowling and Gilboa 1968).One of us (Brazaitis) had been unofficially recording crocodiliansize data for many years, and the publication of these data gavethe crocodilian collection new value, as a wide range of captivecrocodilian growth data would be critical for planning future programs(Dowling and Brazaitis 1966). Dowling brought with hima new direction that positioned the collection and staff for a leapforward in science and the new era of conservation that was athand.A number of basic technological issues needed to be resolvedbefore crocodilian collections could gain the scientific importancethat avian collections had achieved after many bird species hadbeen decimated by the milliners demand for fashionable feathersand commercial hunters had obliterated passenger pigeon populations.Globally, crocodilians had suffered a similar fate. The wildpopulations for most species were abusively over-utilized for theskin and pet trades, species were disappearing from many wildplaces, and even populations of common species were plummeting.The state of the art at the Bronx Zoo mirrored the state of theart throughout the zoological community: collection managementand conservation were not yet in sight.The sex of animals in the crocodilian collection generally re-Lack of TechnologyFIG. 5. A crocodilian nursery and public feeding enhanced the visitorexperience in the modernized reptile house in 1954.<strong>Herpetological</strong> <strong>Review</strong> 39(2), 2008 139
- Page 1 and 2: HerpetologicalReviewVolume 39, Numb
- Page 3 and 4: About Our Cover: Zonosaurus maramai
- Page 5 and 6: Prey-specific Predatory Behavior in
- Page 7 and 8: acid water treatment than in the co
- Page 10 and 11: TABLE 1. Time-line history of croco
- Page 14 and 15: FIG. 6. A 3.9 m (12' 11 1 / 2") Ame
- Page 16 and 17: One of the earliest studies of croc
- Page 18 and 19: TABLE 2. Dimensions and water depth
- Page 20 and 21: we call it, is in flux.Forty years
- Page 22 and 23: Feb. 20-25. abstract.------. 1979.
- Page 24 and 25: yond current practices (Clarke 1972
- Page 26 and 27: poles (Pond 1 > 10,000, Pond 2 4,87
- Page 28 and 29: ------, R. MATHEWS, AND R. KINGSING
- Page 30 and 31: Herpetological Review, 2008, 39(2),
- Page 32 and 33: TABLE 2. Summary of running (includ
- Page 34 and 35: FIG. 2. Responses of adult Regal Ho
- Page 36 and 37: PIANKA, E. R., AND W. S. PARKER. 19
- Page 38 and 39: BUSTAMANTE, M. R. 2005. La cecilia
- Page 40 and 41: Fig. 3. Mean clutch size (number of
- Page 42 and 43: facilitated work in Thailand. I tha
- Page 44 and 45: preocular are not fused. The specim
- Page 46 and 47: FIG. 2A) Side view photo of Aechmea
- Page 48 and 49: 364.DUELLMAN, W. E. 1978. The biolo
- Page 50 and 51: incision, and placed one drop of Ba
- Page 52 and 53: 13 cm deep (e.g., Spea hammondii; M
- Page 54 and 55: FIG. 1. Medicine dropper (60 ml) wi
- Page 56 and 57: esearchers and Hellbenders, especia
- Page 58 and 59: FIG. 3. Relative success of traps p
- Page 60 and 61: data on Hellbender population struc
- Page 62 and 63:
aits sometimes resulted in differen
- Page 64 and 65:
trapping system seems to be a relat
- Page 66 and 67:
AMPHIBIAN CHYTRIDIOMYCOSISGEOGRAPHI
- Page 68 and 69:
TABLE 1. Prevalence of B. dendrobat
- Page 70 and 71:
Conservation Status of United State
- Page 72 and 73:
TABLE 1. Wood Frog (Rana sylvatica)
- Page 74 and 75:
TABLE 1. Anurans that tested positi
- Page 76 and 77:
is, on average, exposed to slightly
- Page 78 and 79:
(10%) were dead but not obviously m
- Page 80 and 81:
Submitted by CHRIS T. McALLISTER, D
- Page 82 and 83:
FIG. 1. Oscillogram, spectrogram, a
- Page 84 and 85:
FIG. 1. Adult Physalaemus cuvieri r
- Page 86 and 87:
Répteis, Instituto Nacional de Pes
- Page 88 and 89:
discovered 145 live hatchlings and
- Page 90 and 91:
GRAPTEMYS GIBBONSI (Pascagoula Map
- Page 92 and 93:
College, and the Joseph Moore Museu
- Page 94 and 95:
FIG. 1. Common Ground Lizard (Ameiv
- Page 96 and 97:
havior unavailable elsewhere. Here
- Page 98 and 99:
15% of predator mass, is typical fo
- Page 100 and 101:
side the third burrow and began a f
- Page 102 and 103:
We thank Arlington James and the st
- Page 104 and 105:
mm) S. viridicornis in its mouth in
- Page 106 and 107:
NECTURUS MACULOSUS (Common Mudpuppy
- Page 108 and 109:
LITHOBATES CATESBEIANUS (American B
- Page 110 and 111:
Research and Collections Center, 13
- Page 112 and 113:
BRONCHOCELA VIETNAMENSIS (Vietnam L
- Page 114 and 115:
Oficina Regional Guaymas, Guaymas,
- Page 116 and 117:
MICRURUS TENER (Texas Coralsnake).
- Page 118 and 119:
declining in this recently discover
- Page 120 and 121:
80.7372°W). 02 November 2005. Stev
- Page 122 and 123:
this effort, 7% of the 10 × 10 km
- Page 124 and 125:
the knowledge of the group. The aut
- Page 126 and 127:
which is listed under “Rhodin, A.
- Page 128 and 129:
noting that Sphenomorphus bignelli
- Page 130 and 131:
256 Herpetological Review 39(2), 20
- Page 132:
ISSN 0018-084XThe Official News-Jou