13.07.2015 Views

PDF - 4.73MB - Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority

PDF - 4.73MB - Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority

PDF - 4.73MB - Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

INVESTIGATIONS AND INTELLIGENCE COURSE PARTICIPANTS, SWITZERLAND — OCTOBER 2012Good relationships between ASADA and relevant government and non-government agencies are critical toeliminating doping in sport. One of our vital partnerships is with the <strong>Australian</strong> Customs and Border ProtectionService (Customs), the agency responsible for seizing importations of prohibited substances entering Australia.During the year, we continually received assistance from Customs while also working collaboratively on a numberof individual investigations.In 2012–13, ASADA intelligence analysed 306 incident reports, 191 of which progressed to intelligence casestatus. Of these matters, 148 derived from external notification incidents (including 85 from Customs and 48 fromthe ACC), 37 from tip-offs and six from field incidents.During the reporting period, 52 cases which were identified as possible doping cases by the Intelligence teamadvanced to a full investigation.Cycling investigationCycling is one of the world’s most popular sports with millions of people either participating in the sport orspectating. Over the years, the sport has received much attention regarding the use of performance-enhancingsubstances by its athletes. This has been mainly due to the sanctioning of a number of high-profile athletes fordoping, including several winners of the prestigious Tour de France. In Australia, there have been 16 <strong>Australian</strong>cyclists sanctioned for anti-doping rule violations since ASADA’s creation in 2006.In 2010 ASADA became aware of allegations of doping against a former <strong>Australian</strong> cyclist by a professional cyclistfrom the United States. The <strong>Australian</strong> was still involved in the sport as a support person and was subject to thesport’s anti-doping policy. In light of the allegations, ASADA commenced gathering intelligence to ascertain thepossible validity of the accusations. However, due to a Federal investigation in the United States and a UnitedStates <strong>Anti</strong>-<strong>Doping</strong> Agency (USADA) investigation, ASADA was unable to obtain sufficient information to pursueits own investigation of the <strong>Australian</strong>. This situation remained unchanged until late 2012.On 10 October 2012, USADA published its ‘Reasoned Decision’ and supporting information in the LanceArmstrong case. In its decision USADA declared ‘the evidence showed beyond any doubt that the US PostalService Pro Cycling Team ran the most sophisticated, professionalised and successful doping program that sport48

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!