13.07.2015 Views

This book - Centro de Estudos Anglicanos

This book - Centro de Estudos Anglicanos

This book - Centro de Estudos Anglicanos

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

112THE EPISCOPALIANSfundamentalists divi<strong>de</strong>d major <strong>de</strong>nominations such as the Northern Baptist Conventionand the Presbyterian Church in the U.S.A., and the Scopes trial of 1925signaled the continuing hold of traditional cultural values on the nation’s ruralareas. 3Relatively untroubled by controversies that upset other American <strong>de</strong>nominations,Episcopalians entered the 1920s in a supremely confi<strong>de</strong>nt mood. Theirchurch had experienced steady growth between 1880 and 1920—the number ofits parishes doubling (from 4,151 to 8,365) and its membership tripling (from345,433 to 1,075,820) in size. In fact, Episcopal lea<strong>de</strong>rs initially resisted participationin the Fe<strong>de</strong>ral Council of Churches because they believed that their <strong>de</strong>nominationwas comprehensive enough by itself to become the “bridge church”into which all others would one day be united. The Episcopal Church, theythought, embodied the best aspects of Catholicism and Protestantism, traditionand mo<strong>de</strong>rnity, diversity and unity—qualities that other Christians might soonhave the wisdom to recognize. Since the <strong>de</strong>nomination enjoyed consi<strong>de</strong>rable socialprestige and occupied a position of historic importance in the Anglo-American world, Episcopalians assumed that they had a unique responsibility todictate the course of ecumenical affairs. 4I<strong>de</strong>as about bureaucratic efficiency also encouraged Episcopalians to mo<strong>de</strong>rnizeand expand their operations at the national level. The General Convention of1919 passed a resolution that required the presiding bishop (formerly the seniordiocesan bishop in the United States) to be elected by the House of Bishops fora renewable six-year term. At the same time, the convention established a 24-member National Council, chaired by the presiding bishop and composed of equalnumbers of bishops, priests, and laymen. The council was given authority tocoordinate the ongoing work of the <strong>de</strong>nomination between triennial meetings ofthe General Convention. Finally, having seen the value of large-scale fund-raisingdrives during the war, Episcopalians initiated a nationwi<strong>de</strong> campaign to i<strong>de</strong>ntifythe needs of their <strong>de</strong>nomination and to increase its financial support. Through thiseffort, the 1919 convention aspired “to bring the spiritual and material resourcesof the Church to bear more effectively . . . upon her whole task as witness to theMaster.” 5THE FAITH AND ORDER MOVEMENTDespite Episcopalians’ general opposition to collaborating with other AmericanProtestants through the Fe<strong>de</strong>ral Council of Churches, Charles Henry Brent, bishopof the Philippines, emerged as a key figure in the early stages of the internationalecumenical movement. Brent had become committed to the cause of church unitywhile attending the Edinburgh Missionary Conference in 1910, when twelve hundred<strong>de</strong>legates from various ecclesiastical traditions and countries gathered todiscuss issues relating to worldwi<strong>de</strong> Christian evangelism. “I was converted,” helater reported. “I learned that something was working that was not of man in thatconference; that the Spirit of God was . . . preparing a new era in the history of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!