This book - Centro de Estudos Anglicanos

156THE EPISCOPALIANS18. “Foundation for Christian Theology Formed,” TLC, 18 September 1966, 6–7 (sourceof quotation); and Shattuck, Episcopalians and Race, 195–203.19. John M. Krumm, “Miracle Convention of 1969,” Witness, 2 September 1969, 7(source of quotation); “An Act of Faith,” Episcopalian, October 1969, 8–17, 22–29, 32–38,56; and Paul M. Washington, “Other Sheep I Have”: The Autobiography of Father PaulM. Washington, ed. David McI. Gracie (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1994),86–96.20. Paul Moore, Presences: A Bishop’s Life in the City (New York: Farrar, Straus, 1997),204–6; Michael B. Friedland, Lift Up Your Voice Like a Trumpet: White Clergy and theCivil Rights and Antiwar Movements, 1954–1973 (Chapel Hill: University of North CarolinaPress, 1998), 144, 148, 178, 201, 219; and Shattuck, Episcopalians and Race, 194.21. “GCSP Liquidated—At Long Last,” TLC, 18 November 1973, 13.22. John M. Allin, quoted in “The Third John and the 23rd PB,” Episcopalian, November1973, 20; and Shattuck, Episcopalians and Race, 202–13.23. Pauli Murray, Pauli Murray: The Autobiography of a Black Activist, Feminist, Lawyer,Priest, and Poet (Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press, 1989), 362. Murray laterbecame the first African American woman to be ordained an Episcopal priest.24. Pamela W. Darling, New Wine: The Story of Women Transforming Leadership andPower in the Episcopal Church (Cambridge: Cowley, 1994), 107–13.25. Ibid., 114–17.26. David E. Sumner, The Episcopal Church’s History: 1945–1985 (Wilton, Conn.:Morehouse-Barlow, 1987), 19–21; and Darling, New Wine, 119–21. On particularly controversialquestions, the rules of the convention required that each diocesan delegation(four clergy and four laity) should be divided into its lay and clerical parts. For the votein either of the two parts to be counted as affirmative, at least three of the four deputiesin that group had to vote for the resolution. A divided vote (2–2), furthermore, was countedas a negative. Thus, the vote for women’s ordination in the clerical order of the House ofDeputies was 50 dioceses “yes,” 43 “no,” and 20 divided; in the lay order of the house, itwas 49 dioceses “yes,” 37 “no,” and 26 divided. But because each divided delegationrepresented a negative vote, the motion was defeated.27. Suzanne R. Hiatt, quoted in Darling, New Wine, 123 (emphasis added).28. Suzanne R. Hiatt, “How We Brought the Good News from Graymoor to Minneapolis:An Episcopal Paradigm,” Journal of Ecumenical Studies 20 (1983): 580.29. Quoted in Carter Heyward, A Priest Forever: One Woman’s Controversial Ordinationin the Episcopal Church (1976; reprint, Cleveland: Pilgrim, 1999), 59.30. Moore, Presences, 293.31. Don S. Armentrout, “Ministry in the History of the Episcopal Church,” SewaneeTheological Review 38 (1995): 250; Hiatt, “How We Brought the Good News,” 580; andMary S. Donovan, Women Priests in the Episcopal Church: The Experience of the FirstDecade (Cincinnati: Forward Movement, 1988), 7.32. Daniel Corrigan, Robert DeWitt, and Edward Welles II, quoted in Alla Bozarth-Campbell, Womanpriest: A Personal Odyssey (New York: Paulist, 1978), 123.33. Merrill Bittner et al., quoted in Bozarth-Campbell, Womanpriest, 125.34. Armentrout, “Ministry in the History of the Episcopal Church,” 251.35. The other women ordained were Merrill Bittner, Alla Bozarth-Campbell, AllisonCheek, Emily Hewitt, Carter Heyward, Marie Moorefield, Jeannette Piccard, Betty BoneSchiess, Katrina Welles Swanson, and Nancy Hatch Wittig.36. Quoted in Bozarth-Campbell, Womanpriest, 135–36.