EQUITY IN SCHOOL WATER AND SANITATIONorder to be able to assess gender parity ordifferences between gender related practices visà-viswater <strong>and</strong> sanitation <strong>in</strong> schools.3. Facilities/<strong>in</strong>frastructure: <strong>School</strong>s which werereported to have good water <strong>and</strong> sanitationfacilities <strong>and</strong> where some focused work had beendone to <strong>in</strong>tegrate water <strong>and</strong> sanitation <strong>and</strong> relatededucation would be preferred. This was essentialto explore <strong>in</strong>clusion/exclusion related to water <strong>and</strong>sanitation. S<strong>in</strong>ce, accord<strong>in</strong>g to secondary datasources, a majority of the schools <strong>in</strong> both thedistricts had reported the existence of toilets forall <strong>and</strong> dedicated dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g water sources with<strong>in</strong>the school, <strong>in</strong>formation available with UNICEF <strong>in</strong>UP was relied upon to make a purposive sampleof the villages. 174. Village development classification: Selectedschools would be from a mix of Nirmal Grams 18<strong>and</strong> Ambedkar Villages 19 (as these are likely tothrow up evidence of good practices) <strong>and</strong> regularvillages (where sites are likely to provide evidenceof exclusion).5. Villages with different types of schools: In orderto capture the range of schools (primary, upperprimary, <strong>and</strong> high school, girls only <strong>and</strong> coeducational),a special effort would be made toidentify such villages as would enable selection ofdifferent k<strong>in</strong>ds of schools. Secondary schools were<strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the sample <strong>in</strong> order to underst<strong>and</strong>exclusion related issues of adolescent girls <strong>and</strong> boys.One block each was selected <strong>in</strong> the two districts –Jakhora block <strong>in</strong> Lalitpur, <strong>and</strong> Rajgarh block <strong>in</strong>Mirzapur. Six sites (villages) were thereafteridentified <strong>in</strong> each of these. Village selection wasbased on available data, <strong>and</strong> this selection wasfurther f<strong>in</strong>e-tuned with the help of UNICEF projectpersonnel who had <strong>in</strong>-depth knowledge of thearea. This short list was discussed with localgovernment (WATSAN) officials <strong>and</strong> projectpersonnel from UP State <strong>Water</strong>Aid. 20 Areconnaissance visit was made to the two blocks,<strong>and</strong> the villages <strong>and</strong> schools which would be<strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the sample were subsequently firmedup (see Table 4 for <strong>in</strong>formation about villages).Table 4 Basic <strong>in</strong>formation about the village sites of the studyMirzapurVillage MS1 MS2 MS3 MS4 MS5 MS6Households134546431721306111Total population8153,6212,8364,5322,243771Males4241,8591,4982,3611,180394Females3911,7621,3382,1711,063377Population 0-6146743519824479180Male7337825941825897Female7336526040622183SC population/%204/25454/12.5575/20.27307/7589/26.25340/44SC Male103245312182319166SC Female101209263175270174Sex ratio922947842919900957Male literacy72.9384.6778.9377.3569.6363.97Female literacy43.855.6252.2246.6841.6830.61Gender gap29.8529.0526.730.628.6433.31217MS4 is on the border of Rajgarh <strong>and</strong> Narayanpur blocks.Inputs were taken on the school sanitation programme from government officials/local UNICEF <strong>and</strong> <strong>Water</strong>Aid personnel.18A Nirmal Gram is a village which has achieved total sanitation <strong>in</strong> its comm<strong>and</strong> area. It is an ‘open-defecation-free’ village whereall houses, schools, <strong>and</strong> ICDS centres (Anganwadis) are supposed to have sanitary toilets.19The Ambedkar Village programme is serviced by 13 different development programmes <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g rural <strong>in</strong>frastructure development,social securities, better health services <strong>and</strong> family welfare, hygienic liv<strong>in</strong>g conditions, employment generation, scholarships <strong>and</strong>l<strong>and</strong> reforms.20<strong>Water</strong>Aid has carried out sanitation related <strong>in</strong>terventions <strong>in</strong> 20 schools of Jakhora block, of which the team f<strong>in</strong>ally selected 3 PS<strong>and</strong> 3 UPS schools.
Overcom<strong>in</strong>g Exclusion <strong>and</strong> Discrim<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong> South AsiaIndia Country ReportLalitpurVillage LS1LS2 LS3 LS4 LS5 LS6Households1871,452731250137229Total population1,0727,5094,7771,6028841,555Males5623,9792,598849452810Females5103,5302,179753392745Population 0-62241,521900302183338Male125771480172100176Female9975042013083162SC population/%348/32.461481/23.81782/37.30201/12.54405/48173/11.12SC Male180772100211421390SC Female1687097808719283Sex ratio907820838886867920Male literacy47.5955.67727665.6267.66Female literacy17.5122.8138.8835.4740.7723.32Gender gap30.0832.8634.1240.5324.8524.24Source: Census of India, Government 20013.3 Research Tools used for theStudyDraft tools (<strong>in</strong> English) were worked out, modified,<strong>and</strong> brought <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e with the comments <strong>and</strong>observations of the lead researcher. They werethen translated <strong>in</strong>to the local language, H<strong>in</strong>di. 21The tools were field tested <strong>and</strong> modified basedon <strong>in</strong>puts received from the field team <strong>and</strong> thelead researcher while she was on a field visit toMirzapur. Table 5 gives an overview of the varioustools used for the research (see Annex 3 for thefull list of research tools).3.4 The FieldworkThe field teams <strong>in</strong>itially established contact withUNICEF officials <strong>in</strong> UP to obta<strong>in</strong> lists of sites thatmet the criteria for selection. Formal permissionswere then sought from local SSA officials <strong>in</strong> thestate headquarters <strong>and</strong> the district. Specialpermission had to be sought from the UPSecondary Education Board <strong>in</strong> Lucknow toconduct the research <strong>in</strong> secondary schools.In order to facilitate permission to do the research<strong>in</strong> the schools, the team leader liaised with theBasic Shiksha Adhikari (BSA) or the BlockEducation Officer, the Block Resource Coord<strong>in</strong>ator(BRC), the District Inspector of <strong>School</strong>s (DIOS),the District Panchayati Raj Officer (DPRO), <strong>and</strong>the Nyaya Panchayat Resource Coord<strong>in</strong>ator(NPRC) of the two districts. A workshop wasconducted <strong>in</strong> Lucknow with the research team(field <strong>in</strong>vestigators) <strong>in</strong> order to expla<strong>in</strong> the purpose<strong>and</strong> objectives of the study, the criteria for siteselection <strong>and</strong> research tools. The tools were tested<strong>in</strong> one primary school <strong>and</strong> one upper primaryschool <strong>and</strong> focus group discussions (FGDs) wereheld with the community at one site. Fieldworkcommenced at the end of January 2009, <strong>and</strong> wascompleted dur<strong>in</strong>g February 2009. Data wascollated by the research team <strong>in</strong> early March 2009.The research team participated <strong>in</strong> a day-longworkshop <strong>in</strong> Lucknow on 14 March 2009 <strong>in</strong> orderto underst<strong>and</strong> the texture of the qualitative data<strong>and</strong> to draw out the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs from the study.21ERU acknowledges the assistance received from Centre for Education Research <strong>and</strong> Practice, Jaipur, for the translation ofschedules from English to H<strong>in</strong>di.13