EQUITY IN SCHOOL WATER AND SANITATIONNeeds of adolescent girls not addressed: Theneeds of school-go<strong>in</strong>g adolescent girls are notaddressed <strong>in</strong> upper primary schools, high schools<strong>and</strong> secondary schools. As it st<strong>and</strong>s today, thegovernment has not paid much attention to <strong>in</strong>schoolbarriers to participation of adolescent girls.This is one area where a lot of work needs to bedone.Children’s forums that exist are notempowered: This is an important learn<strong>in</strong>g fromthis study. While primary schools have BalPanchayats, we found that high schools <strong>and</strong> highersecondary schools do not have democratic forumsto enable students to participate <strong>in</strong> the governanceof the school. Even where children’s forums doexist they are assigned duties <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> some<strong>in</strong>stances their work burden has gone up.The technical note on <strong>in</strong>clusive approach for SSHEclearly states that the programme aims at ensur<strong>in</strong>gthat children learn <strong>and</strong> practise good hygienehabits <strong>and</strong> regular <strong>and</strong> correct use of facilities (GoI<strong>and</strong> UNICEF, 2008). They need to be ‘<strong>in</strong>volved’ <strong>in</strong>the operation <strong>and</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>tenance of the facilities(<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g toilets). However, realities from the fieldshow that <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g children <strong>in</strong> the operation <strong>and</strong>ma<strong>in</strong>tenance of the facilities is <strong>in</strong>terpreted to meanthat they take the entire responsibility forcleanl<strong>in</strong>ess. Undoubtedly they can help to support<strong>and</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> the facilities, but they should notshoulder the full burden of clean<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> wash<strong>in</strong>g(especially when the toilet is be<strong>in</strong>g used byteachers or members of the community). If we areserious about child rights, should we not draw al<strong>in</strong>e? With<strong>in</strong> the overall framework of childprotection <strong>and</strong> participation, is it fair to overloadthe children?Attitudes <strong>and</strong> beliefs: Another important learn<strong>in</strong>gis that exclusion manifests itself <strong>in</strong> different forms,namely exclusion/<strong>in</strong>clusion based on: social group <strong>and</strong> community (Dalits, Sahariya[ST] <strong>and</strong> OBC) economic status of students (not well dressed,dirty clothes, do not bathe) performance <strong>in</strong> the school (good <strong>in</strong> studies/notgood <strong>in</strong> studies; regular/irregular) visible disabilities, <strong>in</strong>fectious diseases (scabies,bad cough) gender (differential duties assigned to boys <strong>and</strong>girls).The attitudes <strong>and</strong> beliefs of teachers are important<strong>in</strong> the school. Their prejudices aga<strong>in</strong>st poorchildren <strong>and</strong> aga<strong>in</strong>st specific social groupsaccentuate discrim<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong> the school. Equally,where teachers have a positive <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>clusiveattitude, the school environment is positive. Asdiscussed <strong>in</strong> the preced<strong>in</strong>g sections, the agencyof the headteacher <strong>and</strong> teachers <strong>in</strong> the school,the village pradhan <strong>and</strong> other importantstakeholders makes a big difference <strong>in</strong> the school<strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> the community. Equally, the situation <strong>in</strong> thevillage <strong>and</strong> the community <strong>in</strong> which the school isembedded is also very important. The contrastbetween Mirzapur <strong>and</strong> Lalitpur shows that it isimportant to work <strong>in</strong> the community <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> theschool.In many ways the school is a microcosm of thesociety <strong>in</strong> which it is embedded. But we also sawthat dynamic leaders <strong>in</strong> schools <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> thecommunity can make a difference. However, forthe change to susta<strong>in</strong>, the immediate environment(village or Panchayat) needs to be supportive <strong>and</strong>appreciative, lead<strong>in</strong>g to a positive spiral of change.Agency of local government <strong>and</strong> community:MDM <strong>in</strong> school is one of the positive policy<strong>in</strong>itiatives <strong>in</strong> India. Here aga<strong>in</strong>, the contrastbetween Mirzapur <strong>and</strong> Lalitpur is palpable. Whilefood is be<strong>in</strong>g cooked <strong>and</strong> served <strong>in</strong> both thedistricts, the quality varies across schools <strong>and</strong>h<strong>in</strong>ges on the <strong>in</strong>terest taken by village leaders <strong>and</strong>teachers. We saw that caste dynamics are farmore pronounced <strong>in</strong> Lalitpur than <strong>in</strong> Mirzapur. Thereason for this is not different from that for thesanitation arena – a more <strong>in</strong>clusive <strong>and</strong> positivesocial environment leads to more <strong>in</strong>clusivepractices <strong>in</strong> the school <strong>and</strong> vice-versa.Change is possible: An important learn<strong>in</strong>g fromthis study is that change is possible. A school level<strong>in</strong>itiative that takes off from the fundamental right(see Box 7) to equality can <strong>in</strong>deed educate childrenabout discrim<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>and</strong> also about the right ofchildren to education, protection <strong>and</strong> care. Whatwas miss<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the entire programme of schoolsanitation is the language of rights. PerhapsUNICEF, with its global m<strong>and</strong>ate of child rights,could make a difference <strong>in</strong> this area. Therecommendations <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g chapter aremade keep<strong>in</strong>g this UNICEF m<strong>and</strong>ate <strong>in</strong>perspective.32
Overcom<strong>in</strong>g Exclusion <strong>and</strong> Discrim<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong> South AsiaIndia Country Report5Conclusions <strong>and</strong> Recommendationsfor the India StudyAttitudes, beliefs, <strong>and</strong> practicesneed to be addressed <strong>in</strong> asusta<strong>in</strong>ed mannerSocial transformation starts with a desire tochange. Teachers, community leaders <strong>and</strong>adm<strong>in</strong>istrators play an important role: they lead,they <strong>in</strong>fluence, <strong>and</strong> they susta<strong>in</strong> change. Dur<strong>in</strong>gthe 1990s <strong>and</strong> right up to 2003 the Governmentof India gave importance to chang<strong>in</strong>g attitudestowards gender relations. Under the DistrictPrimary Education Programme (DPEP) gendertra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g became m<strong>and</strong>atory. Unfortunately themomentum was not susta<strong>in</strong>ed after 2003 whenSSA was <strong>in</strong>troduced. A number of studies carriedout towards the end of the DPEP programme <strong>and</strong>the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of SSA po<strong>in</strong>ted out the need to worktowards chang<strong>in</strong>g the attitudes of teachers <strong>and</strong>educational adm<strong>in</strong>istrators towards both gender<strong>and</strong> social exclusion issues. The presence ofcaste/community biases, neglect of children fromvery poor households <strong>and</strong> communities, <strong>and</strong>cont<strong>in</strong>uation of discrim<strong>in</strong>atory practices towardschildren with special needs have been highlightedat periodic <strong>in</strong>tervals (Jha <strong>and</strong> Jh<strong>in</strong>gran, 2005;Ramach<strong>and</strong>ran, 2004).<strong>Water</strong>, sanitation <strong>and</strong>education: restor<strong>in</strong>g thebalanceWorkload of children: Workload of boys <strong>and</strong> girlsis a sensitive issue <strong>in</strong> schools. Children from poorfamilies work before they come to school; girlsput <strong>in</strong> several hours of housework <strong>and</strong> boys takethe cattle to graze. When they reach the schoolthey are expected to sweep <strong>and</strong> clean as soon asthey arrive <strong>in</strong> the morn<strong>in</strong>g. If we analyse thissituation from a child rights perspective then wecan argue that the workload of children com<strong>in</strong>g togovernment schools is high. It was <strong>in</strong>deed heartwrench<strong>in</strong>gto see young boys <strong>and</strong> girls who cameneat <strong>and</strong> tidy to school be<strong>in</strong>g covered with dust<strong>and</strong> dirt, wet <strong>and</strong> shiver<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the cold with nofacilities to wash <strong>and</strong> clean up after their morn<strong>in</strong>gduties. This sends out the wrong message to thechildren <strong>and</strong> their families. Many childrencompla<strong>in</strong>ed of itchy eyes <strong>and</strong> runn<strong>in</strong>g noses, clearsymptoms of dust allergy. We noticed that <strong>in</strong>several schools the children who cleaned had tomiss the morn<strong>in</strong>g prayer.If we have to educate children on water <strong>and</strong>sanitation then we cannot expect the children totake the entire responsibility of cleanl<strong>in</strong>ess; theycan help, support <strong>and</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>, but they cannotshoulder the full burden of clean<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> wash<strong>in</strong>g.The issue of children tak<strong>in</strong>g full responsibility forclean<strong>in</strong>g needs to be looked at with<strong>in</strong> the overallframework of child protection <strong>and</strong> participation. Itis important not to confuse tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g children <strong>in</strong> theuse of healthy sanitary practices with overload<strong>in</strong>gthem with the work of clean<strong>in</strong>g school toilets. Thisis particularly worrisome when the childrenthemselves are not allowed to use the toilets <strong>and</strong>these facilities are meant only for the teachers. Inone school the children were asked to clean upafter the school premises were given out formarriages <strong>and</strong> other social events. They had towork <strong>in</strong> choked toilets <strong>and</strong> on filthy school grounds.Coord<strong>in</strong>ation: One of the disturb<strong>in</strong>g aspects ofthe school sanitation programme is that there isobvious lack of coord<strong>in</strong>ation among departments;their perspectives <strong>and</strong> priorities are also different.Those enthusiastic about water <strong>and</strong> sanitationrarely view the issue from the children’sperspective. Several adm<strong>in</strong>istrators <strong>and</strong> teacherswe spoke to admitted that there is a lot of pressureon them to demonstrate a successful schoolsanitation programme <strong>and</strong> they translate ‘success’to mean children’s <strong>in</strong>volvement <strong>in</strong> clean<strong>in</strong>g. A lotof time <strong>and</strong> energy goes <strong>in</strong>to beautify<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong>33