Differential treatment in the youth justice system - Equality and ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

DIFFERENTIAL TREATMENT IN THE YOUTH JUSTICE SYSTEMFlood-Page, C., Campbell, S., Harrington, V. and Miller, J. (2000) Youth crime:findings from the 1998/1999 Youth Lifestyles Survey. London: Home Office, HomeOffice Research StudyFoster, J., Newburn, T. and Souhami, A. (2005) Assessing the Impact of theLawrence Enquiry. Home Office research Study 294. London: Home Office.Fryer, P. (1984) Staying Power: The History of Black People in Britain.London: Pluto PressGraham, J. and Bowling, B. (1995) Young people and crime London: Home OfficeGreater London Authority (2003) Four years of Annual London Surveys: Londoners'views of life in the Capital. London: GLAHeath, A. and Cheung, S. (2006) Ethnic Penalties in the Labour Market: Employersand Discrimination. DWP Research Report No. 341House of Commons Home Affairs Committee (2007) Young Black People andthe Criminal Justice System. Second Report of Session 2006/07 Volume 1.London: HMSOJackson, J., Bradford, B., Farrall, S., Roux, G. and Hough, M. (2009) [JUSTISCONCEPTS PAPER]Jones, A. and Singer, L. (2008) Statistics on Race and the Criminal Justice System –2006/7. A Ministry of Justice Publication under Section 95 of the Criminal Justice Act1991. London: Ministry of JusticeKeith, M. (1993) Race, Riots and Policing: Lore and Disorder in a Multi-RacistSociety, London: UCL PressMacpherson, W. (1999) The Stephen Lawrence Inquiry, Report of an inquiry by SirWilliam Macpherson of Cluny, advised by Tom Cook, The Right Reverend Dr JohnSentamu and Dr Richard Stone. CM 4262-1. London: The Stationary OfficeMaguire, M. (2007) ‘Crime data and statistics’, in Maguire, M, Morgan, R and Reiner,R (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Criminology. Fourth Edition. Oxford: OxfordUniversity PressMay, T., Gyateng, T. and Bateman, T. (forthcoming). Exploring the needs of youngblack and minority ethnic offenders and provision of targeted interventions. London:Youth Justice BoardMhlanga, B. (1997) The Colour of English Justice: A Multivariate Analysis. Aldershot:AveburyMinistry of Justice (2007) Criminal Statistics 2006 England and Wales. London:Ministry of JusticeMinistry of Justice (2008) Criminal Statistics: England and Wales 2007. London:Ministry of Justice143
REFERENCESMirrlees-Black, C., Budd, T., Partridge, S. and Mayhew, P. (1998) The 1998 BritishCrime Survey, London: Home OfficeModood, T., Berthoud, R., Lakey, J., Smith, P., Virdee, S. and Beishon, S. (1997)Ethnic minorities in Britain: Diversity and Disadvantage. London: Policy StudiesInstituteMORI Youth Survey 2004 (2004) London: Youth Justice BoardMuir, W.K. (1977) The Police: Streetcorner Politicians. Chicago: Chicago UniversityPressMVA and Miller, J. (2000) Profiling Populations Available for Stops and Searches,Police Research Series Paper 131, London: Home OfficeNacro (2007) Effective practice with children and young people who offend – part 2.Youth crime briefing, March 2007. London: NacroNazroo, J.Y. (1997) The Health of Britain's Ethnic Minorities: Findings from a NationalSurvey. London: Policy Studies InstituteOffice for National Statistics (2005) Focus on Ethnicity and Identity. London: ANational Statistics PublicationOffice for National Statistics (August 2008 release) Population Estimates by EthnicGroup. Data for 10-17 year olds by ethnicity in 2006Packer, H. (1968) The Limits of the Criminal Sanction. Stanford, Cal: StanfordUniversity Press and Oxford University PressPhillips, C. and Bowling, B. (2002) ‘Ethnicity, racism, crime and criminal justice’, inMaguire, M., Morgan, R. and Reiner, R. (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Criminology.Third Edition. Oxford: Oxford University PressPhillips, C. and Bowling, B. (2003) Racism, Ethnicity and Criminology. DevelopingMinority Perspectives. British Journal of Criminology, 43(2), pp.269-290Phillips, C. and Bowling, B. (2003) The Experiences of Crime and Criminal Justiceamong Minority Ethnic Groups: A Review of the Literature, Final ReportRollock, N. (2009) The Stephen Lawrence Inquiry 10 Years On: A Critical Review ofthe Literature. The Runnymede Trust Report SummarySharp, C. and Budd, T. (2003) Minority ethnic groups and crime: findings from theOffending, Crime and Justice Survey. Online Report 33/05Stockdale, J., Whitehead, C. and Rennie, R. (2002) Policing and Deprivation: areview of the evidence. Discussion paper Number 5. February 2002. London: LSEStone, V. and Pettigrew, N. (2000) The Views of the Public on Stops and Searches.London: Home Office144
Page 1 and 2:
Equality and Human Rights Commissio
Page 3 and 4:
© Equality and Human Rights Commis
Page 5 and 6:
Appendix A: Area profiles 97Appendi
Page 7 and 8:
Tables and figuresPageTables3.1 Pop
Page 9 and 10:
GlossaryBCUBasic Command UnitCJSCri
Page 11:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARYAssessing the reas
Page 15 and 16:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARYPolice training•
Page 17 and 18:
INTRODUCTIONover-represented in rob
Page 19 and 20:
INTRODUCTIONthe increase in prosecu
Page 21 and 22:
INTRODUCTIONIn contrast, a MORI sel
Page 23 and 24:
INTRODUCTIONexplanation is that you
Page 25 and 26:
INTRODUCTIONin itself, if the socia
Page 27 and 28:
RESEARCH METHODS2. Research methods
Page 29 and 30:
RESEARCH METHODS29% was white; 6% b
Page 31 and 32:
RESEARCH METHODSfor several differe
Page 33 and 34:
YOUNG PEOPLE’S ENTRY INTO THE YOU
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
UNDERSTANDING THE POLICING OF YOUNG
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
PASSING THROUGH THE YOUTH JUSTICE S
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS6. Discus
Page 107 and 108: DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONSdefendant
Page 109 and 110: DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONSdifficult
Page 111 and 112: DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONSFurther r
Page 113 and 114: APPENDICES10- to 17-year-old popula
Page 115 and 116: APPENDICES16s making up 23% of the
Page 117 and 118: APPENDICESAppendix B:Tables of offe
Page 119 and 120: APPENDICESCustody record dataTable
Page 121 and 122: APPENDICESTable B7Area C custody re
Page 123 and 124: APPENDICESAppendix C:YOT data sampl
Page 125 and 126: APPENDICESTable C3ONS estimated 10-
Page 127 and 128: APPENDICESTable C5Profile of crimes
Page 129 and 130: APPENDICESTable C6 Profile of crime
Page 131 and 132: APPENDICESTable C7aCase profile% Ma
Page 133 and 134: APPENDICESTable C8Proportion of off
Page 135 and 136: Table C10Proportion of disposals gi
Page 137 and 138: Table C12Proportion of sentenced di
Page 139 and 140: Appendix D:Multivariate logistic re
Page 141 and 142: APPENDICESTable D3Model of prosecut
Page 143 and 144: APPENDICESTable D6Model of dismissa
Page 145 and 146: APPENDICESTable D8: Model of Remand
Page 147 and 148: APPENDICESTable D10Asset sample, mo
Page 149 and 150: APPENDICESTable D11Asset sample, mo
Page 151 and 152: Table D13Model of community sentenc
Page 153 and 154: APPENDICESTable D15 Model of custod
Page 155 and 156: APPENDICESTable D17Length of custod
Page 157: REFERENCESReferencesAudit Commissio
Page 161 and 162: ContactsEnglandEquality and Human R
show all

Differential treatment in the youth justice system - Equality and ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?