05.12.2012 Views

newsadvancements and initiatives - Faculty Matters

newsadvancements and initiatives - Faculty Matters

newsadvancements and initiatives - Faculty Matters

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6<br />

<strong>Faculty</strong> <strong>Matters</strong> Summer 2012<br />

your<br />

opinions<br />

“ We’ve launched a<br />

whole new online<br />

experience at<br />

<strong>Faculty</strong><strong>Matters</strong>.com.<br />

Be sure to visit!”<br />

— Tracy Nita Pender<br />

Senior Editor,<br />

<strong>Faculty</strong> <strong>Matters</strong><br />

comments, critiques <strong>and</strong> kudos<br />

I<br />

’m part of the psychology online faculty, teaching<br />

undergrad through Ph.D., <strong>and</strong> have been with<br />

University of Phoenix since 2006. I’m a psychologist<br />

in my own private practice but have also been an<br />

award-winning faculty member previously at another<br />

university. I prefaced my statement with that<br />

information because I wanted you to know that I mean<br />

it when I say thank you for the University’s <strong>Faculty</strong><br />

<strong>Matters</strong> magazine.<br />

Particularly, I’m happy to see my colleagues get the<br />

well-deserved feature profiles showing their hard<br />

work in <strong>and</strong> out of the classroom. I have been a public<br />

person for many years as an author <strong>and</strong> television oncamera<br />

expert, so I get plenty of exposure. But I have<br />

seen so many talented colleagues work <strong>and</strong> toil with no<br />

recognition at so many schools. Many universities give<br />

lip service to words such as “value of faculty, respect<br />

for faculty, etc., etc.,” but no actual follow-through.<br />

University of Phoenix’s magazine, the honoraria<br />

spotlight <strong>and</strong> featuring publications <strong>and</strong> books by<br />

faculty is refreshing <strong>and</strong> inspiring to see.<br />

— Dr. William July, University of Phoenix faculty<br />

Houston, TX<br />

The letters below were received in response to our Spring 2012<br />

edition feature “Can faculty influence right <strong>and</strong> wrong?”<br />

I<br />

believe our behavior, ethical or not, is a function of<br />

our own belief <strong>and</strong> value system. These could be<br />

based on religious beliefs, education in philosophy,<br />

a sense of fair play, or at the simplest level a sense<br />

of what is right or wrong. These factors combine to<br />

produce our observable behaviors which are usually<br />

habitual. Since the behaviors are habitual we will<br />

usually display then if watched or not watched.<br />

— Thomas A. Graham, University of Phoenix faculty<br />

Moore, OK<br />

Iwas disappointed that the discussion of ethics<br />

in the Spring 2012 issue of <strong>Faculty</strong> <strong>Matters</strong> was<br />

so shallow <strong>and</strong> uninformed <strong>and</strong> that the article<br />

reporting the recent poll [Your Voice, pages 34-37]<br />

on ethics careened from one fallacy to another.<br />

To start, take the word “ethics”—nobody seems to<br />

have noted that the word does not refer to a pre-set,<br />

prescribed system of guidelines for behavior—“right<br />

<strong>and</strong> wrong”—but rather to any system of concepts,<br />

sometimes explicit rules, about what is “right <strong>and</strong><br />

wrong.” As such, different cultures <strong>and</strong> different people<br />

may have (<strong>and</strong> do have) different ideas about right<br />

<strong>and</strong> wrong—<strong>and</strong> very often conflicting ideas of what<br />

is right or wrong, which is not to say that one person is<br />

ethical <strong>and</strong> another not—simply that their ethics differ.<br />

A gross example (by which I mean exceedingly<br />

unsubtle): honor killings. In the West, to kill a female<br />

relative because she transgressed an ethical code<br />

(perhaps went out on a date with a young man, was<br />

caught holding h<strong>and</strong>s with a boyfriend) is considered<br />

vastly unethical; we in the West can hardly conceive<br />

anything more unethical. Yet, in some parts of the<br />

world, such is the ethical duty of males in a family.<br />

I was just reading this morning about a 16-year-old<br />

Moroccan girl, having been forced by the local court to<br />

marry the man who had raped her, committed suicide.<br />

Again, we in the West consider this a tremendous<br />

travesty <strong>and</strong> the depth of barbarism. Evidently, in<br />

some codes of Moroccan justice, forcing a woman to<br />

marry her rapist is considered the height of ethics.<br />

And, as much as I agree with <strong>and</strong> am imbued in the<br />

Western system, I have to acknowledge that the<br />

other system does constitute a system of ethics.<br />

So, to ask the questions, “Do you feel that ethics are on<br />

the decline in the U.S.?” or “Do you feel that students<br />

today are more or less ethical,” really is to ask the<br />

wrong questions—or to ask questions with mistaken<br />

presuppositions: the presupposition that there is a set<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ard of ethics to which everyone agrees <strong>and</strong> by<br />

which all behavior may be judged, <strong>and</strong> by this st<strong>and</strong>ard,<br />

ethics can be said to “rise” or “decline.” This is simply<br />

not true, <strong>and</strong> to ask the question does little more<br />

than to prompt a rousing chorus of the song from<br />

the musical Bye, Bye, Birdie: “Kids! What’s the matter<br />

with kids today?” (Which, I have read, is very similar<br />

to a complaint found on an ancient Egyptian tomb.)<br />

— Dr. Michael McIntyre, University of Phoenix faculty<br />

Crestline, CA<br />

Corrections<br />

In the article “Keeping it real,” in our spring edition, Maryse Nazon was<br />

incorrectly listed as holding her Ph.D. Dr. Nazon holds her Psy.D.<br />

In the same edition, Dr. Barb Turner, DAA of the Asia Military Campus in<br />

Okinawa, Japan, was incorrectly listed as Barbara Taylor. Dr. Turner wrote<br />

the letter alerting us to the need to change our tagline for <strong>Faculty</strong> Faces.<br />

<strong>Faculty</strong> <strong>Matters</strong> apologizes for the errors.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!