08.08.2015 Views

ECONOMIC

Report - The American Presidency Project

Report - The American Presidency Project

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

to the economy but also in the sense that consumers' attention focused onthem. Retail meat prices rose 5.4 percent a month in February and March asa result of a 39 percent increase in livestock prices from November 1972 toMarch 1973. Shortages of crude oil pushed up retail fuel oil prices 7.4percent during the winter, and a rise of 16 percent in prices of lumber andwood products was reflected in the prices of new houses and indirectly influencedthe prices of existing houses.As a result of the acceleration of inflation, pressures mounted to tightencontrols. While Phase II controls were in effect, public opinion polls indicatedthat the popularity of a return to a price freeze diminished, reachinga point in the last quarter of 1972 at which only about a fourth of the populationsupported such an action. According to the polls, however, by February,43 percent of the population wanted a return to a price freeze, and thesepressures for stricter controls were reflected within the Congress. One effectof this sentiment among the public and the Congress may have been to encourageprice increases in anticipation of a freeze.The Administration was sensitive to the growing pressures from consumersand Congress and was also concerned that the acceleration of inflationwould undo the gains achieved by slowing the private nonfarm wagerate increases, as measured by average hourly earnings adjusted for interindustryshifts and overtime in manufacturing, from a peak annual rate of8.5 percent for the third quarter of 1970 to 5.0 percent for the first quarterof 1973. The situation posed a dilemma for policy makers, however, becausethe major source of inflation was in commodity markets, in which controlshave only limited usefulness. The problems of hides and lumber that wereencountered during Phase II had made this apparent. The most effectiveway to slow price increases for raw commodities is to increase their supply.Numerous actions, detailed in Table 24, were taken by means of agriculturalprograms, foreign trade policy instruments, and stockpile policies toexpand supplies of lumber, agricultural products, metals, and petroleumproducts. While some of these policies increased supply quickly, others requiredmore time to take effect and had little immediate impact on therate of inflation.PHASE III IS TIGHTENEDThe Administration recognized that controls were unlikely to be effectivein holding down prices of those consumer goods that are derived almostdirectly from crude commodities. Nonetheless, in the face of mountingpressure, selected changes in the administration of controls were institutedin order to assure labor and consumers that everything possible was beingdone to contain price increases. Thus, on March 6, cost justification wasrequired of major producers of crude oil and petroleum products whosought price increases yielding more than a 1 percent yearly addition to theirrevenues; for increases greater than 1.5 percent prenotification was required.This deterred price increases which would otherwise have been useful94

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!