08.08.2015 Views

ECONOMIC

Report - The American Presidency Project

Report - The American Presidency Project

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

United States in October, this did not reduce the value of oil imports duringthe rest of the year. (For a more complete discussion of these developmentssee Chapter 4.)The relatively slow growth of total imports during 1973, despite the rapidincrease in imports of crude and refined petroleum products, is the mostvisible indicator of the impact of exchange rate realignment on U.S. trade.In the later stages of a cyclical expansion, imports should accelerate asdomestic producers run low on domestic supplies and rely on foreign suppliersto meet their demands. The fact that the volume of imports did notgrow very much faster during 1973 than it did in 1972 suggests that thedollar depreciation had a significant effect on trade.Developments in U.S. bilateral trade provide some additional clues tothe impact of exchange rate realignments. For countries whose currencieshave shown a relatively large appreciation in relation to the dollar, one mightexpect that imports from the United States would grow more rapidlythan exports to the United States. This appears to be true, both for Japanand for the EC. Japan, whose currency has risen sharply against the dollar,experienced a 73 percent increase in imports from the United States duringthe first 3 quarters of 1973, while Japanese exports to the United Statesincreased only 9 percent. The EC, whose currencies also rose sharplyin relation to the dollar, increased their imports from the United States by40 percent, while their exports to the United States increased by 23 percent.For countries whose currencies changed relatively little in relation to thedollar, the growth rates of exports to and imports from the United Statesshould be more nearly alike. This appears to be true for Canada and theUnited Kingdom, whose currencies changed relatively little during 1973 inrelation to the U.S. dollar. Exports by Canada to the United States andimports from the United States both increased by around 20 percent. Exportsby the United Kingdom to the United States and imports from theUnited States both grew by around 30 percent.U.S. trade with Communist countries in Europe, including the U.S.S.R.,increased dramatically during 1973, not because of exchange rate realignments,but because of a normalization of trade relations combined withpoor harvests in the Soviet Union. Exports to the Communist countriesin Europe increased to $1.4 billion for the first 3 quarters of 1973, whileimports rose to $0.4 billion. Most of the increase in exports was due to largersales of agricultural products.Investments. During the first 3 quarters of 1973 private foreigners mademore long-term investments in the United States than Americans madeabroad. The effective depreciation of the dollar encouraged foreign investmentin the United States during the year because it reduced the relativecost of producing internationally traded goods in the United States ratherthan abroad. The relative cost of producing in the United States declinedfurther as a result of a tendency for wages to rise more rapidly abroad thanin the United States; foreign firms thus had a greater incentive to produce191

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!