Crosscutting Gender Issuestoo, women remain underrepresented in the positions that wield the most power andauthority, and tend to be most numerous in rural communities and in unpaid positions.58. <strong>Armenia</strong> has 11 administrative divisions—10 marzer and the capital city of Yerevan(which has the status of a community). The marzer are divided into urban and ruralcommunities (915 in total, most of them rural). Marzpet (chief executives) are appointedby the President (although the mayor of Yerevan is an elected position). On the otherhand, local administration consists of the head of the municipality (roughly equivalentto a mayor) and the avaganikhorhurd (a municipal council), which are elected positions.Residents do not directly elect local administrators but vote for political parties to berepresented on the avaganikhorhurd. The parties then select their leading candidate whowill become mayor if the party gains at least 40% of votes.59. As illustrated in Table 3, there are no female marzpet and only one deputymarzpet in Armavir Marz, but women comprise more than 40% of government staff inthe provinces. Of the women in the Yerevan government, virtually all are employed asmunicipal staff. There are no female deputy mayors, and only 5 of 65 city council membersare women. 55 Although the Office of the Governor is formally responsible for coordinatingthe activity of executive offices at the marz level, “experience shows that the governor hasmuch more power. Taking into account the financial weakness of the communities, thelevers that the governor has, i.e., defining development priorities of the marz, distributinggrants and exercising financial oversight, give [the] governor strong authority over localadministrations.” 5660. There are only 22 female mayors in <strong>Armenia</strong>, all in rural communities. As is the caseat other levels in local government, women generally occupy administrative, not decisionmaking,posts. Further, there is a clear trend in <strong>Armenia</strong> that women’s participation inlocal governance varies by the size of the community. Women are best represented inthe smallest municipalities with the fewest resources. Of the rural communities thatwere led by female mayors in 2011 (24 at the time), none had populations of over 2,500. 57Table 3: Women in Provincial Government, 2012–2013PositionTotalPositionsNumber ofWomenProportion ofWomen(%)Heads of marz (marzpet) a 10 0 …Deputy heads of marz 24 1 4.2Heads of marzpetaran staff 10 2 20.0Marzpetaran staff 1,297 554 42.7... = not available.aExcluding the mayor of Yerevan.Sources: Government of the Republic of <strong>Armenia</strong>. Structure. http://www.gov.am/en/structure/; and National StatisticalService of the Republic of <strong>Armenia</strong>. 2013. Women and Men in <strong>Armenia</strong> 2013. Yerevan. p. 156.55 Women and Men in <strong>Armenia</strong> 2013. p. 159.56 H. Mikaelyan. 2011. Women in Local Administration in <strong>Armenia</strong>. Caucasus Institute Research Paper Series. No. 6. Yerevan: CaucasusInstitute, UNDP, and Heinrich Böll Stiftung. p. 13.57 Ibid., p. 19.17
<strong>Armenia</strong> Country Gender AssessmentUrbanRuralTable 4: Women in Local Self-Government, 2012PositionTotalPositionsNumber ofWomenProportion ofWomen(%)Mayors 48 0 …Deputy mayors 51 1 2.0Municipal council members 581 33 5.7Municipality staff 2,154 932 43.3Mayors 866 20 2.3Deputy mayors 536 39 7.3Municipal council members 5,310 505 9.5Municipality staff 6,492 3,158 48.6… = not available.Source: National Statistical Service of the Republic of <strong>Armenia</strong>. 2013. Women and Men in <strong>Armenia</strong> 2013. Yerevan. pp. 157–158.A review of women’s engagement in local governance by marz indicates that the marzerthat are characterized by strong and average participation of women are those that are“further from the capital and less prosperous” than the others, while those that are betterdeveloped and closer to the center of the country have low participation of women. 5861. Of elected positions, women are best represented on avaganikhorhurdner, butwomen have still not reached 10% representation (Table 4). Avaganikhorhurd membersare not paid (the mayor and mayor’s staff receive salaries), and this is considered a reasonfor the ineffectiveness of such councils and the lack of value placed on them. In fact, “thehead of the community is the head of the executive power [the mayor] who determinesexpenditure and community development priorities.” 59 Focus group participants in thecities of Gavar and Gyumri noted that avaganikhorhurdner are not, in fact, decisionmakingbodies. They serve a consultative function, and because members are appointedby heads of local administration, avaganikhorhurdner merely approve decisions. Still,many respondents to this assessment emphasized that the number of women on theavaganikhorhurdner has been steadily increasing. Comparing data from 2003 to 2013, thetotal number of women on the avaganikhorhurdner in urban areas increased from 3.4%to 5.7%, and on rural councils from 6.9% to 9.5%. 60 Anecdotal information suggests thatdespite the fact that the avaganikhorhurdner offer limited opportunities for independentdecision making, women are becoming more politically active in their communities.3. Barriers to Women Entering Government62. The reasons for women’s underrepresentation in governance vary, but some can beattributed to organizational factors, while others are closely related to societal perceptionsof women’s roles.58 Ibid.59 Ibid., p. 14.60 National Statistical Service of the Republic of <strong>Armenia</strong>. 2005. Women and Men in <strong>Armenia</strong> 2005. Yerevan. p. 82; and Women and Men in<strong>Armenia</strong> 2013, pp. 157–158.18