27.10.2015 Views

Queens

northeast_queens_bus_study_-_final_9-28-15

northeast_queens_bus_study_-_final_9-28-15

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

, Metropolitan Transportation Authority<br />

5. PUBLIC INPUT<br />

During the course of the Northeast <strong>Queens</strong> Bus Study, the MTA received public input from bus customers,<br />

local residents, and elected officials through several channels. MTA staff attended Public<br />

Transit/Transportation Committee meetings of <strong>Queens</strong> Community Boards 7, 8, 11 and 13, whose<br />

jurisdictions are part of the study area. Meetings were held between October 2014 and January 2015.<br />

These meetings covered ongoing issues related to bus service, and issues related specifically to this study.<br />

Follow‐up meetings were held in March and April of 2015 to discuss early findings and to gather additional<br />

comments.<br />

On Thursday, February 26, 2015, the MTA conducted a public workshop at <strong>Queens</strong>borough Community<br />

College to speak directly with community members and receive input on possible improvements to bus<br />

service in Northeast <strong>Queens</strong>. More than 100 community members participated in the workshop. MTA<br />

staff elicited travel patterns, feedback on problem locations, and suggestions for better service.<br />

Community members gathered around large maps to draw and label specific sites in need of<br />

improvement. MTA staff note takers received comments from individuals, and many individuals<br />

submitted additional written comments. In addition, elected officials elicited input from their constituents<br />

and transmitted this input to the MTA for consideration.<br />

Hundreds of comments and suggestions were submitted during the course of this study. The comments<br />

ranged from large‐scale, long‐term issues, such as a desire for a bus terminal in Flushing, to smaller,<br />

localized issues. Some of these broader issues are addressed on the following pages, while more specific<br />

issues are addressed in a Question‐and‐Answer section in Appendix A of this document. While all<br />

comments were evaluated and considered by the MTA, not all of these comments could be addressed<br />

within the scope of this report.<br />

55

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!