Queens
northeast_queens_bus_study_-_final_9-28-15
northeast_queens_bus_study_-_final_9-28-15
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
, Metropolitan Transportation Authority<br />
5. PUBLIC INPUT<br />
During the course of the Northeast <strong>Queens</strong> Bus Study, the MTA received public input from bus customers,<br />
local residents, and elected officials through several channels. MTA staff attended Public<br />
Transit/Transportation Committee meetings of <strong>Queens</strong> Community Boards 7, 8, 11 and 13, whose<br />
jurisdictions are part of the study area. Meetings were held between October 2014 and January 2015.<br />
These meetings covered ongoing issues related to bus service, and issues related specifically to this study.<br />
Follow‐up meetings were held in March and April of 2015 to discuss early findings and to gather additional<br />
comments.<br />
On Thursday, February 26, 2015, the MTA conducted a public workshop at <strong>Queens</strong>borough Community<br />
College to speak directly with community members and receive input on possible improvements to bus<br />
service in Northeast <strong>Queens</strong>. More than 100 community members participated in the workshop. MTA<br />
staff elicited travel patterns, feedback on problem locations, and suggestions for better service.<br />
Community members gathered around large maps to draw and label specific sites in need of<br />
improvement. MTA staff note takers received comments from individuals, and many individuals<br />
submitted additional written comments. In addition, elected officials elicited input from their constituents<br />
and transmitted this input to the MTA for consideration.<br />
Hundreds of comments and suggestions were submitted during the course of this study. The comments<br />
ranged from large‐scale, long‐term issues, such as a desire for a bus terminal in Flushing, to smaller,<br />
localized issues. Some of these broader issues are addressed on the following pages, while more specific<br />
issues are addressed in a Question‐and‐Answer section in Appendix A of this document. While all<br />
comments were evaluated and considered by the MTA, not all of these comments could be addressed<br />
within the scope of this report.<br />
55