16.12.2015 Views

the new hr

1NT8tPl

1NT8tPl

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR<br />

Baba Prasad is<br />

president and CEO,<br />

Vivékin Group. He<br />

is also <strong>the</strong> author<br />

of Nimble - How<br />

intelligence can<br />

create agile<br />

companies and<br />

wise leaders.<br />

and culture. Our microeconomics-driven analytical<br />

approach to strategy has forgotten <strong>the</strong> critical<br />

people aspect, which we need to bring back into<br />

<strong>the</strong> organisation.<br />

You say ‘strategy is no longer a plan for a set<br />

of actions to be performed’. Given this, how<br />

would you define strategy?<br />

Since we now work in environments where we<br />

increasingly have no idea of what will happen even<br />

in <strong>the</strong> next few weeks or months, we do not have<br />

<strong>the</strong> luxury of multi-year strategic plans. We need<br />

to be prepared to handle a range of eventualities<br />

that may occur anytime. Strategy is no longer about<br />

creating a plan of actions that will be performed in<br />

<strong>the</strong> future; it is about planning and building a set<br />

of flexibilities <strong>the</strong> organisation can use to handle an<br />

uncertain future, as it unfolds.<br />

Define visionary intelligence.<br />

Visionary intelligence is <strong>the</strong> ability to quickly<br />

envision both <strong>the</strong> long-term effects of a current<br />

decision—what will be <strong>the</strong> result of this decision<br />

a few years from now?—and also to quickly<br />

determine <strong>the</strong> width of impact it will have—how<br />

many people or processes will it affect, and in<br />

what ways? What could be just reactive kneejerk<br />

response becomes strategic with <strong>the</strong> use of<br />

visionary intelligence. It helps us see <strong>the</strong> difference<br />

between killing <strong>the</strong> goose and waiting for <strong>the</strong><br />

golden eggs.<br />

Elaborating on <strong>the</strong> reasons for <strong>the</strong> failure<br />

of Nokia, you talk about <strong>the</strong> need for<br />

developing ‘multiple agilities’. Please<br />

elaborate this concept in <strong>the</strong> Vivékin Agility<br />

Matrix (VAMTM).<br />

Nokia made a name for itself with its tremendous<br />

supply chain flexibility. Its response after a fire in a<br />

New Mexico factory that made chips for its phones<br />

is cited as a textbook case of supply chain agility.<br />

And yet, a few years after this, Nokia’s stock prices<br />

were kissing <strong>the</strong> floor. They over-focused on this<br />

one agility and neglected o<strong>the</strong>rs—for instance, it<br />

did not show <strong>the</strong> communicative agility needed<br />

to sense that <strong>the</strong> North American market wanted<br />

a different kind of handset than <strong>the</strong> Asian market,<br />

and it lost out to Motorola <strong>the</strong>re. Companies, and<br />

leaders, should have multiple agilities and use <strong>the</strong>m<br />

in context-sensitive ways.<br />

The Vivékin Agility Matrix is a 2x2 matrix that<br />

classifies companies based on whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>y have<br />

multiple agilities and whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>y are context<br />

sensitive. Companies that are nei<strong>the</strong>r agile<br />

nor context-sensitive are ‘dinosaurs’—despite<br />

possessing massive resources, <strong>the</strong>y will die because<br />

<strong>the</strong>y do not adapt. This happened to computer giant<br />

Digital Equipment Corporation in <strong>the</strong> 1990s, at a<br />

time when IBM also barely survived. Companies<br />

that are not agile but are context sensitive are<br />

‘bears’; <strong>the</strong>y know <strong>the</strong>y cannot operate in certain<br />

contexts, so <strong>the</strong>y withdraw when conditions are<br />

bad and re-emerge when <strong>the</strong> context is better.<br />

‘Cheetahs’ are companies like Nokia that respond<br />

to everything with a single agility, without paying<br />

attention to context—just like <strong>the</strong> cheetah which<br />

hunts only by running across plains in daytime as<br />

it cannot climb trees or see at night. Finally, <strong>the</strong><br />

model company in <strong>the</strong> Vivékin Agilities Matrix is<br />

<strong>the</strong> ‘human’ which ranks high on both agility and<br />

context-sensitiveness—humans have multiple<br />

agilities, especially visionary agility, and know<br />

which agility to use in which context.<br />

How can a company/leader<br />

programmatically develop and use agility?<br />

The concept of strategy itself changes when you<br />

adopt an intelligences-driven approach. We help<br />

our client organisations implement intelligencesdriven<br />

strategy t<strong>hr</strong>ough M-A-S-T: ‘mapping’ <strong>the</strong><br />

kinds of flexibilities <strong>the</strong>y anticipate <strong>the</strong>y will need<br />

in <strong>the</strong> market space <strong>the</strong>y are in; ‘assessing’ what<br />

flexibilities <strong>the</strong>y currently have; ‘strategising’ to<br />

(i) develop <strong>the</strong> flexibilities <strong>the</strong>y do not have but<br />

anticipate <strong>the</strong>y will need and (ii) to leverage <strong>the</strong><br />

flexibilities <strong>the</strong>y already have; and since it is an<br />

uncertain world, ‘testing’ to check whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong><br />

mapping, <strong>the</strong> assessment, and <strong>the</strong> strategising<br />

have been correct. This returns us in a loop to <strong>the</strong><br />

mapping phase. We call this <strong>the</strong> MAST loop. Agile<br />

46 INDIAN MANAGEMENT NOVEMBER 2015

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!