16.12.2015 Views

the new hr

1NT8tPl

1NT8tPl

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Innovation<br />

Dilemmas<br />

© Buschmen | Dreamstime.com - Miele Gallery On Unter Den Linden Photo<br />

The challenge of using<br />

as a tool for innovation in <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

canned questionnaires<br />

marketing efforts.<br />

Despite <strong>the</strong> advances<br />

is that customers<br />

in technology that enable<br />

struggle to articulate<br />

companies to co-create<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir needs.<br />

personalised experiences<br />

with customers, <strong>the</strong> nontechnology<br />

sectors still face<br />

some challenges. For example, how does Tata<br />

Motors or Maruti Suzuki co-create an automobile<br />

with customers? A key article by Goffin, Varnes,<br />

van der Hoven, and Koners (2012) highlights <strong>the</strong>se<br />

challenges. One of <strong>the</strong> main methods organisations<br />

employ to understand customer needs are survey<br />

questions and focus groups. The challenge of using<br />

canned questionnaires is that customers struggle<br />

to articulate <strong>the</strong>ir needs 2 . They are not aware of<br />

<strong>the</strong> limitations of <strong>the</strong> current products, and cannot<br />

imagine what future possibilities are. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore,<br />

<strong>the</strong>y are prompted to think about existing products<br />

ra<strong>the</strong>r than probing for unresolved issues and<br />

unmet needs. Although using focus groups alleviates<br />

some of <strong>the</strong>se challenges, two still remain. Firstly,<br />

customers behave differently when in <strong>the</strong>ir own<br />

environments. Secondly, when <strong>the</strong>y are outside<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir own environments, market researchers miss<br />

out on seeing valuable contextual clues that give<br />

designers potential ideas. These authors suggest that<br />

using ethnography to understand customer needs<br />

enables organisations to tap into unrecognised as<br />

well as unarticulated customer needs. For example,<br />

<strong>the</strong>y refer to Miele, a German manufacturer of<br />

high-end domestic appliances, who used ‘listen and<br />

watch’ teams to observe <strong>the</strong> cleaning practices of<br />

parents who have children suffering from allergies.<br />

Home visits suggested that parents of children with<br />

allergies vacuumed a mattress several times a day<br />

to know that it is clean. However, <strong>the</strong>se parents<br />

did not complain about <strong>the</strong> extra time or amount<br />

of intense cleaning because <strong>the</strong>y were used to<br />

regular intensive cleaning. The ‘listen and watch’<br />

teams recognised this hidden need and developed<br />

a vacuum cleaner that indicated if an item being<br />

cleaned is dust-free. They included a hygiene<br />

sensor that turned from red to amber to green<br />

as <strong>the</strong> cleaning progressed. This sensor became a<br />

breakt<strong>hr</strong>ough feature for people who have allergies<br />

to know when a room is free of dust.<br />

Thus, <strong>the</strong>re are several ways t<strong>hr</strong>ough which<br />

organisations assess customer needs and<br />

incorporate <strong>the</strong> voice of <strong>the</strong> customer when<br />

developing innovations. These include several<br />

quantitative and qualitative approaches such as<br />

field surveys, qualitative interviews, key informant<br />

approach, and frameworks that result from <strong>the</strong>m,<br />

including ‘<strong>the</strong> customer-centered innovation map’, 3<br />

‘customer journey mapping’, 4 and ‘jobs-to-bedone’.<br />

5 To understand whe<strong>the</strong>r you are simply<br />

‘hearing <strong>the</strong> voice’ of <strong>the</strong> customer or ‘co-creating’<br />

with <strong>the</strong>m, here are some questions to consider 6 .<br />

1. Is <strong>the</strong> conversation end point clear? The end<br />

point emerges as a result of a dialogue between<br />

<strong>the</strong> firm and <strong>the</strong> customer in a co-creation<br />

framework, whereas in traditional market<br />

research <strong>the</strong> end point is clearly defined.<br />

2. Do <strong>the</strong> firm and <strong>the</strong> customer build off of each<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r’s comments? One idea from a customer<br />

triggers ideas that <strong>the</strong> firm could build upon and<br />

vice-versa, where both <strong>the</strong> firm and customer<br />

explore and jointly create <strong>new</strong> ideas.<br />

3. Is <strong>the</strong>re a willingness to explore <strong>the</strong> assumptions<br />

that underlie <strong>the</strong> dialogue? Both <strong>the</strong> firm<br />

and customer must identify and explore <strong>the</strong><br />

assumptions such that <strong>the</strong>y understand <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

I NDIAN MANAGEMENT NOVEMBER 2015 73

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!