26.02.2016 Views

StarCat/CatStar

StarCat/CatStar is dedicated to the memory of David Bowie, that cosmic subversive who’s returned at last to his ethereal home.

StarCat/CatStar is dedicated to the memory of David Bowie, that cosmic subversive who’s returned at last to his ethereal home.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

was heading in a very different direction. I returned two years ago, and<br />

was devastated to discover the hideous morass this country has waded<br />

into. The vile misogynist rantings cited above are not restricted to the<br />

upper echelons of government and the media. They have pervaded<br />

Australian culture, and the most horrifying symptom of this process is an<br />

enormous epidemic of domestic violence against women: gendered violence<br />

committed with impunity behind closed doors. In my state (Western<br />

Australia) alone, there were 10,648 female victims of domestic violence in<br />

2014. I am writing this at 10.43 in the morning, and so far today, it is<br />

estimated that police in Australia will already have been called to respond<br />

to 293 domestic violence incidents. In my small region alone, 16 women<br />

and children were killed by violent men in 2015.<br />

Nor is this a phenomenon restricted to isolated sectors of society. I<br />

live in a comparatively prosperous, “respectable” seaside town, and I know<br />

people whose lives are blighted by domestic violence on a daily basis. The<br />

perpetrators continue to bash, intimidate and terrorise with impunity<br />

because of the toxic cultural conditions which have been incubated by<br />

media and political establishments intent on spreading misogyny. In the<br />

process, newspapers such as The Australian have also employed openly<br />

misogynist female commentators like Bettina Arndt, a “sex-therapist” who<br />

has in the past advised women who do not want sex from their partners to<br />

give in and “take one for the team”, and who now uses her column to<br />

encourage “Men’s Rights Activists” (most of whom are insane wife-bashers<br />

and gaslighters, or apologists for them) to disrupt the activities of antidomestic<br />

violence groups such as the White Ribbon Campaign. This is the<br />

same newspaper whose female fashion columnists contributed to the<br />

Gillard-hating chorus by relentlessly criticising her wardrobe, and whose<br />

extreme right-wing commentator Janet Albrechtsen argued that Gillard<br />

was not qualified to be Prime-Minister because “She has never had to make<br />

room for the frustrating demands and magnificent responsibilities of<br />

caring for little babies, picking up sick children from school, raising<br />

teenagers. Not to mention the needs of a husband or partner.” [sic:<br />

grammar.]<br />

Much of the blame for this utterly toxic cultural climate must fall at<br />

the feet of the Murdoch media empire. How can any journalist dare to<br />

criticise a woman for choosing to not have children in this hideously<br />

overpopulated world, or claim that she is unqualified for political office<br />

because she has exercised that choice which it is the unquestionable right<br />

of every woman to make? How exactly would changing nappies make her a<br />

better politician? How can a newspaper editor seriously contemplate<br />

publishing such unconscionable rubbish, and then go on to publish the<br />

writing of a “sex-therapist” who tacitly condones marital rape?<br />

These things happen because too many Australian people buy the<br />

newspaper, because they vote for a woman-hating Prime-Minister and sit<br />

by whilst he makes himself “Minister for Women”, because when that<br />

Prime-Minister is deposed and another takes his place, and promotes a

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!