AGRICULTURE
a-i6030e
a-i6030e
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
CHAPTER 4<br />
FOOD AND <strong>AGRICULTURE</strong><br />
SYSTEMS IN CLIMATE<br />
CHANGE MITIGATION<br />
Having examined in Chapter 3 measures that<br />
build the resilience of smallholders and<br />
vulnerable rural populations to climate change,<br />
we take a broader view of agriculture and food<br />
systems in order to assess their potential<br />
contribution to climate change mitigation. The<br />
agriculture sectors will be called upon to play<br />
their part in mitigation, because they will<br />
generate an increasingly large share of what will<br />
become, hopefully, declining levels of global<br />
emissions, and because they can, under certain<br />
conditions, sequester carbon dioxide.<br />
Agricultural emissions are expected to grow<br />
along with food demand, which is being driven<br />
by population and income growth and associated<br />
changes in diets towards more animal-source<br />
products. Agriculture can contribute to<br />
mitigation by decoupling its production increases<br />
from its emissions increases through reductions<br />
in emission intensity, which is the quantity of<br />
GHGs generated per unit of output. This, in turn,<br />
can be complemented by actions that reduce food<br />
losses and waste and foster changes in food<br />
consumption patterns.<br />
The agriculture sectors, particularly forestry, have<br />
a unique potential to act as carbon sinks by<br />
absorbing CO 2 and sequestering carbon in biomass<br />
and soil. At present, however, deforestation is a<br />
major source of emissions, and unsustainable<br />
farming practices continue to deplete the Earth’s<br />
stock of soil organic carbon. Tapping into the<br />
carbon sequestration potential of forests and<br />
agricultural lands will depend on biophysical<br />
conditions, technical options and policies.<br />
Since agricultural emissions, as well as sinks, are<br />
part of the global carbon (C) and nitrogen (N)<br />
cycles, optimizing agriculture’s mitigation<br />
potential requires first an understanding of these<br />
cycles and how agricultural activities interact with<br />
them. This understanding will permit a fuller<br />
appreciation of the difficulties inherent in<br />
reducing agricultural emissions, which involve<br />
complex biophysical processes and are more<br />
difficult to monitor and control than emissions<br />
from most other anthropogenic sources of<br />
greenhouse gases. Improving the efficiency with<br />
which natural resources are used in agriculture<br />
will be a central element of mitigation strategies.<br />
It is important to recall that in the agriculture<br />
sectors it is impossible to separate the objectives of<br />
food security, adaptation and mitigation, because<br />
there are synergies and trade-offs among them.<br />
Growing experience has shown that integrated<br />
packages of technologies and practices, tailored to<br />
the specific agroecological conditions of<br />
producers, are required to deliver mitigation and<br />
adaptation in a cost-effective manner. •<br />
THE TECHNICAL<br />
POTENTIAL FOR<br />
MITIGATION WITH<br />
ADAPTATION<br />
Agriculture, forestry and land use (AFOLU) are<br />
responsible for about 21 percent of total<br />
greenhouse gas emissions. All carbon dioxide<br />
emissions from AFOLU are attributable to<br />
forestry and land use change, such as<br />
conversion of forests to pasture or crop<br />
production. The bulk of emissions of methane<br />
and nitrous oxide are attributable to agricultural<br />
practices (Table 5). Improved management of<br />
carbon and nitrogen in agriculture, therefore,<br />
will be crucial to its contribution to climate<br />
change mitigation (Box 16). »<br />
| 72 |