09.12.2012 Views

Second edition

Second edition

Second edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

07.qxd 3/10/08 9:35 AM Page 298<br />

298 Other major syndromes<br />

and rocking from side to side; furthermore, if attempts are<br />

made to restrain the patient, these are generally met with<br />

some resistance. In a conversion grand mal seizure, some<br />

patients may bite their lips, but the tongue is generally<br />

spared; furthermore, it is very rare to see urinary incontinence<br />

during a conversion seizure. After the event one typically<br />

does not see any confusion, nor does one find a<br />

positive Babinski sign. Conversion complex partial seizures<br />

are more difficult to diagnose given, as discussed in Section<br />

7.3, the extraordinary range of symptomatology seen in<br />

true complex partial seizures. In general, however, as the<br />

behavior becomes more complex and the episode lasts<br />

longer, well past 5 minutes, the greater the likelihood is<br />

that the event represents a conversion seizure. Laboratory<br />

testing, including video–EEG and serum prolactin, neuron-specific<br />

enolase and CPK levels, may be required to<br />

confirm the diagnostic impression, and these are discussed<br />

further in Section 7.3.<br />

Other conversion symptoms, of course, are possible, and<br />

these include aphonia, anosmia, nystgmus, convergence<br />

spasm, and ageusia.<br />

Demonstrating a ‘violation’ may at times require considerable<br />

ingenuity on the part of the examining physician,<br />

and in all cases requires a thorough and detailed neurologic<br />

examination coupled with a firm grasp of the anatomy and<br />

physiology of the nervous system. Whether or not investigation<br />

beyond the clinical examination is required, for<br />

example with MR scanning, evoked potentials or EEGs, is a<br />

question that should be decided on a case-by case basis.<br />

Certainly, if the ‘violation’ is questionable, such investigation<br />

should be considered.<br />

Although conversion disorder may occur in isolation,<br />

most patients have other disorders (Binzer et al. 1997),<br />

most commonly either a depression or a personality disorder<br />

of the histrionic, passive–aggressive, borderline, or<br />

antisocial types. Another feature often said to occur in<br />

association with conversion symptoms is ‘la belle indifference’,<br />

that is to say a casual indifference to symptoms, such<br />

as blindness or hemianesthesia, which would normally<br />

provoke considerable alarm. Unfortunately, this is not a<br />

reliable symptom, as it may either be absent or seen in<br />

other disorders (Stone et al. 2006). Furthermore, it may be<br />

confused with anosognosia.<br />

COURSE<br />

Conversion disorder may pursue either an episodic or<br />

chronic course (Mace and Trimble 1996). In episodic cases,<br />

recovery is seen typically in a matter of weeks or months; this<br />

favorable turn of events is more likely in younger patients,<br />

those of good intelligence, and in cases wherein the onset is<br />

acute, and occurs shortly after a major emotional stress. In<br />

those who do recover, however, recurrences are common in<br />

the following years; when recurrences do occur, the symptoms<br />

may or may not be the same. Chronicity may be anticipated<br />

when initial symptoms persist much beyond<br />

6 months.<br />

ETIOLOGY<br />

The experience of patients with conversion symptoms is<br />

quite remarkable. Although it may be clear to the examining<br />

physician that the symptoms are, in some sense or other,<br />

‘produced’ by the patient, the patient is not aware of doing<br />

so: for the patient, the symptom simply appeared, and did so<br />

not on the basis of any motivation or intention that the<br />

patient was aware of. Various theories have been proposed to<br />

explain this. Some invoke the concept of dissociation or suggest<br />

an association with hypnotic phenomena, whereas others<br />

involve unconscious motivations. For example, in<br />

explaining of conversion paralysis, say, of the right arm, one<br />

might speculate that the patient experienced a number of<br />

events unconsciously, including anger and a desire to strike<br />

out, guilt at entertaining such a notion and a sense of shame<br />

at not acting decisively. Here, the ‘paralysis’ of the arm serves<br />

two purposes: it effectively prevents the patient from hurting<br />

anyone, thus avoiding guilt, but also provides a ready excuse<br />

why decisive action cannot be taken, thus avoiding shame.<br />

Although such theories have a strong intuitive appeal, there is<br />

not, as yet, compelling evidence in their support.<br />

Imaging studies have provided some interesting results.<br />

SPECT scanning has revealed decreased activity in the striatum<br />

and thalamus contralateral to conversion paralysis,<br />

with this asymmetry resolving with remission of the paralysis<br />

(Vuilleumier et al. 2001). Positron emission tomography<br />

(PET) scanning has revealed underactivation of the motor<br />

cortex contralateral to conversion paralysis when patients<br />

are requested to move the limb, with associated increased<br />

activation of the orbitofrontal and anterior cingulate cortex<br />

(Marshall et al. 1997), and, in a similar vein, functional MR<br />

scanning revealed decreased activity in the sensory cortex<br />

contralateral to conversion anesthesia (Ghaffar et al. 2006).<br />

Finally, in one study, MR scanning revealed slight atrophy<br />

of both striata and the right thalamus in patients with conversion<br />

disorder (Atmaca et al. 2006).<br />

Overall, it may be prudent to say that the appearance of<br />

conversion symptoms involves dysfunction of the corticostriato-thalamic<br />

circuitry, which, in some as yet unknown<br />

fashion, is associated with behavior whose motivation is<br />

unknown to the patient.<br />

DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS<br />

The most important differential to make, of course, is<br />

between conversion symptoms and ‘true’ symptoms that<br />

are, in fact, occurring on the basis of central or peripheral<br />

nervous system disease. In this regard, it must be borne in<br />

mind that, despite thorough investigation, a small minority<br />

of patients who receive the diagnosis of conversion disorder<br />

will, on follow-up, be found to have lesions missed during<br />

the initial evaluation (Binzer and Kullgren 1998; Moene<br />

et al. 2000). Consequently, the importance of a detailed and<br />

thorough examination, coupled with appropriate imaging<br />

and laboratory testing, cannot be overemphasized.<br />

Conversion symptoms may occur not only in conversion<br />

disorder, but also in Briquet’s syndrome and schizophrenia.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!