09.12.2012 Views

Second edition

Second edition

Second edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

08.qxd 3/10/08 9:38 AM Page 337<br />

Figure 8.1 Note the relative sparing of the pre- and postcentral<br />

gyri compared with the rest of the cortex in this case of<br />

Alzheimer’s disease. (Reproduced from Rees et al. 1996.)<br />

Figure 8.2 This T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging scan<br />

demonstrates the cortical atrophy and ventricular dilation found<br />

in advanced Alzheimer’s disease. Note in particular that the<br />

hippocampus, indicated by the arrows, has shrunk down to a thin<br />

remnant. (Reproduced from Gillespie and Jackson 2000.)<br />

and an increased level of tau protein (Andreasen et al. 2001;<br />

Galasko et al. 1998; Hampel et al. 2004), and a recent<br />

autopsy study demonstrated a good correlation between<br />

CSF levels of tau protein and the burden of neurofibrillary<br />

tangles (Buerger et al. 2006).<br />

Although single photon emission computed tomography<br />

(SPECT) scanning may show areas of decreased activity<br />

in association with neocortical areas, this technique is<br />

probably not appropriate for routine clinical work as in an<br />

autopsy control study (McNeill et al. 2007) it added little to<br />

diagnostic accuracy over and above a good history and<br />

examination.<br />

Course<br />

8.1 Alzheimer’s disease 337<br />

Although a small minority of patients may experience temporary<br />

plateaus, Alzheimer’s disease, for the most part, is<br />

relentlessly and steadily progressive, death occurring for<br />

most within 5–15 years. At the end, patients are vegetative,<br />

bedfast, and incontinent. Although it is generally held that<br />

cases with an early onset, before the age of 65 years, tend to<br />

run a more rapid course (Koss et al. 1996), not all studies<br />

agree on this (Bracco et al. 1994).<br />

Etiology<br />

Macroscopically, as illustrated in Figure 8.1, there is widespread<br />

cortical atrophy affecting primarily the temporal,<br />

parietal, and frontal lobes, with prominent sparing of the<br />

pre- and post-central gyri; relative to the other lobes the<br />

occipital lobe is less affected. Within the temporal lobe,<br />

the hippocampus (as illustrated in Figure 8.2) and amygdala<br />

are also very prominently involved. Subcortical and<br />

brainstem nuclei, including the nucleus basalis of Meynert<br />

(especially its cholinergic neurons) (Whitehouse et al.<br />

1981), the locus ceruleus (Mann et al. 1984), and the dorsal<br />

raphe nucleus (Yamamoto and Hirano 1985), also<br />

undergo significant damage.<br />

Microscopically (Kidd 1964) there are widespread neurofibrillary<br />

tangles and neuritic plaques (also known as<br />

senile plaques) accompanied by neuronal loss (Terry et al.<br />

1981). Neurofibrillary tangles are fibrillar structures found<br />

in the neuronal cytoplasm that, by electron microscopy,<br />

are seen to be composed of paired helical filaments. These<br />

paired helical filaments are composed of hyperphosphorylated<br />

tau proteins, which are one of the microtubule-associated<br />

proteins (MAP) that ensure the integrity and<br />

stability of the cellular microtubules. Neuritic plaques are<br />

spherical extracellular structures composed of an amyloid<br />

core surrounded by ‘neurites’, or swollen axonal fragments.<br />

The amyloid core of the neuritic plaque is composed<br />

primarily of beta-amyloid.<br />

Interestingly, although the clinical severity of Alzheimer’s<br />

disease correlates with the number of neurofibrillary<br />

tangles, there is little correlation with the number of neuritic<br />

plaques (Arriagada et al. 1992; Bierer et al. 1995).<br />

Furthermore, it appears that, in general, there is an<br />

orderly appearance of neurofibrillary tangles during the<br />

course of the disease, beginning first in the transentorhinal<br />

cortex and then progressing sequentially to the entorhinal<br />

cortex, hippocampus, temporal cortex, parietal and prefrontal<br />

cortex, and finally all neocortical areas (Braak<br />

and Braak 1991; Delacourte et al. 1999). This progression<br />

appears to supply a pathologic underpinning to the<br />

evolution of clinical features noted above, in that damage<br />

to medial temporal structures would be expected to<br />

cause an amnesia, whereas later damage to cortical areas<br />

would account for the appearance of further cognitive<br />

deficits.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!