03.04.2017 Views

PUTIN’S RESET

Putins_Reset

Putins_Reset

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

"This is where everything is being turned on its head," said Fiona Hill, an expert<br />

on Russia at the Brookings Institution, a think tank in Washington. "Their days<br />

of dominating the European gas markets are gone."<br />

Any nations that trade in energy could potentially gain or lose.<br />

"The relative fortunes of the United States, Russia, and China – and their ability<br />

to exert influence in the world – are tied in no small measure to global gas<br />

developments," Harvard University's Kennedy School of Government concluded<br />

in a report this summer. 264<br />

Knowing what we know about Vladimir Putin, it is abundantly clear that he<br />

would not take these developments lying down. And he hasn’t. It is well documented<br />

that Putin has publicly opposed fracking of any type. Russia’s Gazprom is on record<br />

claiming that shale gas development is harmful to the environment. Under normal<br />

circumstances and with many heads of state, this would be viewed as political<br />

posturing. In the case of Russia and Putin, however, these pronouncements are<br />

reflective of their strategy.<br />

It has been documented that the KGB funded environmental groups to further<br />

Soviet policy. It seems likely that such efforts have continued under former KGB<br />

officers Putin and Panarin. According to Oleg Kalugin, former Head of<br />

Counterintelligence for the KGB,<br />

The environmental movement was also targeted for KGB infiltration, he says,<br />

with the simple message that the best way to preserve nature was to work against<br />

the system that would exploit it for profits . . .<br />

Kalugin says the new regime in Russia is not to be trusted, and that Americans<br />

must be on their guard. 265<br />

This is significant due to the fact that something as simple as declaring a single<br />

lizard to be endangered has the potential to shut down energy development. 266 In the<br />

case of the Permian basin, the loss could have been as much as 500 million barrels of<br />

domestic oil. Fortunately, despite serious pressure from environmental groups, the<br />

Department of Interior chose not to declare the Sand Dune Lizard endangered,<br />

267 268<br />

allowing the Basin to produce almost two million barrels per day by 2016.<br />

Some might believe it absurd to imagine that a two-inch lizard could prevent the<br />

production of two million barrels of oil per day, valued closed to $200 million at<br />

present.<br />

The Heritage Foundation documented how the UAE funded a Matt Damon<br />

movie designed to turn American opinion against fracking. 269 Their motive is simple<br />

and obvious. It is not a stretch to believe that other major energy producers such as<br />

74

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!