22.09.2017 Views

Global Compact International Yearbook 2009

The road to Copenhagen is the catchphrase: Climate Change is the top issue of inaugural edition, on the market since 1th of august 2009. In a very personal and exclusive foreword, UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon stresses the urgency of multilateral action: „One underlying message of this Yearbook is that a global, low-carbon economy is not only technologically possible, it makes good business sense“, said Ban. „We need the voice and energy of business to help us combat climate change.“ Sir Anthony Giddens adds the importance of the upcoming Copenhagen Climate Summit: „It is an important year, and everybody knows it because it is the year of Copenhagen. It’s a key for climate change policy. I do hope the Copenhagen negotiations will be successful, but there are reasons I have to be worried. “ Another key issue of this edition is the global economic crisis: 2008 will be remembered as the year of crises. The breakdown of financial institutions and markets and the subsequent worldwide economic downturn have put the spotlight on issues that the United Nations Global Compact has long advocated as essential responsibilities for modern business and today’s global markets: comprehensive risk management, long-term performance, and ethics. Georg Kell, Executive Director of the Global Compact, writes: „Restoring confidence and trust in markets requires a shift to long-term sustainable value creation, and corporate responsibility must be an instrument towards this end. If the crisis is any indication, it is now time to build on the advances made over the past 10 years by companies and investors in the area of ESG performance and bring this discipline to the mainstream. “

The road to Copenhagen is the catchphrase: Climate Change is the top issue of inaugural edition, on the market since 1th of august 2009. In a very personal and exclusive foreword, UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon stresses the urgency of multilateral action: „One underlying message of this Yearbook is that a global, low-carbon economy is not only technologically possible, it makes good business sense“, said Ban. „We need the voice and energy of business to help us combat climate change.“ Sir Anthony Giddens adds the importance of the upcoming Copenhagen Climate Summit: „It is an important year, and everybody knows it because it is the year of Copenhagen. It’s a key for climate change policy. I do hope the Copenhagen negotiations will be successful, but there are reasons I have to be worried. “

Another key issue of this edition is the global economic crisis: 2008 will be remembered as the year of crises. The breakdown of financial institutions and markets and the subsequent worldwide economic downturn have put the spotlight on issues that the United Nations Global Compact has long advocated as essential responsibilities for modern business and today’s global markets: comprehensive risk management, long-term performance, and ethics. Georg Kell, Executive Director of the Global Compact, writes: „Restoring confidence and trust in markets requires a shift to long-term sustainable value creation, and corporate responsibility must be an instrument towards this end. If the crisis is any indication, it is now time to build on the advances made over the past 10 years by companies and investors in the area of ESG performance and bring this discipline to the mainstream. “

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

News around the world<br />

North America<br />

so also the greenhouse gas emissions, of<br />

2.4 million households or 3.1 million<br />

automobiles. The study “Carbon Footprint<br />

of Spam” by the consulting firm<br />

ICF <strong>International</strong> calculated that, in the<br />

U.S.A. alone, 8.2 billion kilograms of CO2<br />

are created by junk mail. By the way:<br />

The production of spam mails itself uses<br />

hardly any energy. Rather, 80 percent of<br />

the energy consumption results from<br />

viewing and deleting spam, 16 percent<br />

from its filtering.<br />

Environment<br />

U.S.A. voted onto UN Human<br />

Rights Council<br />

The U.S.A. has been elected to the Human<br />

Rights Council by the UN General<br />

Assembly. Until recently, America had<br />

boycotted the Council due to anti-Israel<br />

statements. The new Obama Administration<br />

has now moved away from the<br />

previous rigid rejectionist stance and has<br />

Vullutatem iure con et nisl eu feum<br />

dolore delit vullaortie cor susto odigna<br />

conse min ulla facilis doloreet adit<br />

aliquam corperi liquipit lorper sum ipisi.<br />

announced it would work constructively<br />

on the Council. Julie de Riviero of Human<br />

Rights Watch praises this move:<br />

“We hope that the Americans will bring<br />

to the Council a new dynamic and a<br />

new commitment to human rights –<br />

especially as a country that is coming<br />

to terms with its own human rights<br />

offenses.” Many human rights activists<br />

had accused the U.S.A. of avoiding the<br />

Council in large part due to its own human<br />

rights violations. The UN Human<br />

Rights Council has existed since 2006,<br />

when it replaced the UN Commission<br />

on Human Rights. The Council is made<br />

up of 47 elected member states, which<br />

report directly to the General Assembly.<br />

The seats are distributed proportionately<br />

by geography: Africa and Asia each have<br />

13 seats, Latin America and the Caribbean<br />

8, Western Europe 7 and Eastern Europe<br />

6. Besides the U.S.A., China, Russia, Cuba<br />

and Saudi Arabia were also elected to<br />

the Human Rights Council by the UN<br />

General Assembly.<br />

Canada & UN Security Council<br />

seat: Water is the way<br />

Maude Barlow, senior advisor on water<br />

to the President of the United Nations<br />

General Assembly and Council of Canadians<br />

chairperson, says the Harper<br />

government's goal of a seat on the UN<br />

Security Council should be denied until<br />

Canada formally recognizes water as a<br />

human right. Canada and the United<br />

States have been the strongest opponents<br />

of the right to water at the United<br />

Nations. There is speculation that US<br />

President Barack Obama will change<br />

the American position on the right to<br />

water, but there is no indication to date<br />

that Prime Minister Harper intends to<br />

change his government's position on<br />

the issue. By 2025, the United Nations<br />

estimates that 2.8 billion people in 48<br />

countries will be living in areas facing<br />

water stress or scarcity. "It would be wonderful<br />

to see Canada on the UN Security<br />

Council helping to address the critical<br />

global challenges of our day," concludes<br />

Barlow. "But if the Harper government<br />

fails to act on the global water crisis, then<br />

it simply does not deserve to take that<br />

seat." The Canadian government under<br />

Prime Minister Stephen Harper has made<br />

securing a seat on the 15-member UN<br />

Security Council for the 2011-12 term a<br />

top foreign policy priority. The election<br />

will take place in October 2010. Canada<br />

is vying for this seat against Portugal<br />

and Germany, countries which already<br />

endorse the right to water.<br />

Native Americans:<br />

jobs vs. tradition?<br />

With an unemployment rate of over 80<br />

percent, the situation on the Northern<br />

Cheyenne Indian Reservation is depressing.<br />

Massive coal deposits on the reservation<br />

could change this. A bitter dispute<br />

has now broken out over mining rights<br />

and ecological consequences. The newly<br />

elected tribe president Leroy Spang is a<br />

former mineworker and favors awarding<br />

coal and gas concessions to big energy<br />

corporations. Opposed are the traditionalists,<br />

who fear for the tribe’s identity.<br />

“This is the last war that our people are<br />

going to face,” says Philipp Whiteman<br />

to USA Today. Whiteman is founder of<br />

Yellow Bird, a non-profit group promoting<br />

respect for the land and environment.<br />

Many reservation residents, like<br />

him, fear that mining would destroy<br />

the tribe’s culture and beliefs, which<br />

are closely linked to the “Black Rocks”<br />

mountains. Added to this is the worry of<br />

being cheated by the mining companies.<br />

The federal government as trustee had<br />

already tried to sell the coal deposits in<br />

the sixties. Back then, the land was sold<br />

without the Native Americans’ consent.<br />

It was only in 1976 that the U.S. Supreme<br />

Court recognized the Cheyenne’s right<br />

to own the reservation land. Local environmental<br />

groups have now turned to<br />

President Obama and hope for support<br />

in expanding renewable energies as an<br />

alternative to coal mining.<br />

<strong>Global</strong> <strong>Compact</strong> <strong>International</strong> <strong>Yearbook</strong> <strong>2009</strong> 9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!