19.11.2017 Views

a-general-introduction-to-psychoanalysis-sigmund-freud

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

its hills and pitfalls, demands and considerations. For I know that it is the<br />

same in all sciences, and must be so in their beginnings particularly. I know,<br />

<strong>to</strong>o, that teaching as a rule endeavors <strong>to</strong> hide these difficulties and these<br />

incompletely developed phases from the student. But that will not do in<br />

<strong>psychoanalysis</strong>. I have, as a matter of fact, made two assumptions, one<br />

within the other, and he who finds the whole <strong>to</strong>o troublesome and <strong>to</strong>o<br />

uncertain or is accus<strong>to</strong>med <strong>to</strong> greater security or more elegant derivations,<br />

need go no further with us. What I mean is, he should leave psychological<br />

problems entirely alone, for it must be apprehended that he will not find the<br />

sure and safe way he is prepared <strong>to</strong> go, traversable. Then, <strong>to</strong>o, it is<br />

superfluous for a science that has something <strong>to</strong> offer <strong>to</strong> plead for audi<strong>to</strong>rs and<br />

adherents. Its results must create its atmosphere, and it must then bide its<br />

time until these have attracted attention <strong>to</strong> themselves.<br />

I would warn those of you, however, who care <strong>to</strong> continue, that my two<br />

assumptions are not of equal worth. The first, that the dream is a psychic<br />

phenomenon, is the assumption we wish <strong>to</strong> prove by the results of our work.<br />

The other has already been proved in another field, and I take the liberty only<br />

of transferring it from that field <strong>to</strong> our problem.<br />

Where, in what field of observation shall we seek the proof that there is in<br />

man a knowledge of which he is not conscious, as we here wish <strong>to</strong> assume in<br />

the case of the dreamer? That would be a remarkable, a surprising fact, one<br />

which would change our understanding of the psychic life, and which would<br />

have no need <strong>to</strong> hide itself. To name it would be <strong>to</strong> destroy it, and yet it<br />

pretends <strong>to</strong> be something real, a contradiction in terms. Nor does it hide<br />

itself. It is no result of the fact itself that we are ignorant of its existence and<br />

have not troubled sufficiently about it. That is just as little our fault as the fact<br />

that all these psychological problems are condemned by persons who have<br />

kept away from all observations and experiments which are decisive in this<br />

respect.<br />

The proof appeared in the field of hypnotic phenomena. When, in the year<br />

1889, I was a witness <strong>to</strong> the extraordinarily enlightening demonstrations of<br />

Siebault and Bernheim in Nancy, I witnessed also the following experiment: If<br />

one placed a man in the somnambulistic state, allowed him <strong>to</strong> have all<br />

86

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!