15.12.2012 Views

Abstracts 4. Gemeinsamer Jahreskongress der ... - SWISS KNIFE

Abstracts 4. Gemeinsamer Jahreskongress der ... - SWISS KNIFE

Abstracts 4. Gemeinsamer Jahreskongress der ... - SWISS KNIFE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

swissknife spezial 06 12.06.2006 13:39 Uhr Seite 56<br />

Results: Pure MiS and MaS were present in 3 and 10 patients, respectively, while mixed steatosis<br />

were observed in the remaining 45 patients. Forty four patients (75%) had mild (30%) steatosis. Steatotic patients had significantly higher<br />

changes in AST/ALT, prothrombin time, and bilirubin levels. Blood loss (p=0.04), transfusions<br />

(p=0.03), and ICU stay (p=0.001) were increased in steatotic patients. Overall (50% vs. 25%,<br />

p=0.007) and major complications (27.5% vs. 6.9%, p=0.001) were significantly higher in the<br />

steatotic group compared with the lean group. Patients with pure MaS had increased mortality<br />

(MaS: 20% vs. MiS: 6.6% vs. Mixed: 0%, p=0.36) and major complication rates (MaS: 66%<br />

vs. MiS: 50% vs. Mixed: 24%; p=0.59) but without statistical significance.<br />

Conclusion: Steatosis per se regardless the type is a risk factor for post-operative complications<br />

and should be consi<strong>der</strong>ed in the planning of extended liver resections.<br />

33.15<br />

H. Petrowsky 1 , M. Selzner 2 , L. McCormack 1 , M. Trujillo 3 , W. Jochum 4 , P. Clavien 5<br />

1 Swiss Hpb Center, Dept. of Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital of Zurich,<br />

8091 Zurich/CH, 2 Swiss Hpb Center, Dept. of Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University<br />

Hospital of Surgery, 8091 Zurich/CH, 3 Dept. of Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University<br />

Hospital of Zurich, 8091 Zurich/CH, 4 Dept. of Pathology, University Hospital of Zurich, 8091<br />

Zurich/CH, 5 Swiss Hpb Center, Dept. Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital of<br />

Zurich, 8091 Zurich/CH<br />

Intermittent portal triad clamping vs. ischemic preconditioning for major liver resection: a<br />

randomized controlled trial<br />

Objective: Ischemic preconditioning (IP) with continuous clamping and intermittent clamping<br />

(IC) of the portal triad are distinct protective approaches against ischemic injury which proved<br />

to be superior in randomized controlled trials (RCT) to continuous inflow occlusion alone.<br />

We designed a RCT to evaluate whether IP with continuous clamping or IC of the portal triad<br />

confers better protection during liver surgery.<br />

Methods: Non-cirrhotic patients un<strong>der</strong>going major liver resection were randomized to receive<br />

IP with inflow occlusion (n=36) or IC (n=37). Primary end points were postoperative liver injury<br />

and intra-operative blood loss. Postoperative liver injury was assessed by peak values of<br />

AST and ALT, as well as the area un<strong>der</strong> the curve (AUC) of the postoperative transaminase<br />

course. Secondary end points included resection time, the need of blood transfusion, ICU and<br />

hospital stay as well as postoperative complications and mortality.<br />

Results: Both groups were comparable regarding demographics, ASA score, type of hepatectomy,<br />

duration of inflow occlusion (range: 30-75 min), and resection surface. The transectionrelated<br />

blood loss was 146 vs. 250 ml (p=0.008), and when standardized to the resection<br />

surface 1.2 vs. 1.8 ml/cm2 (p=0.01) for IP and IC, respectively. Although peak AST, AUCAST,<br />

and AUCALT were lower for IC, the differences did not reach statistical significance. Overall<br />

(42 vs. 38%) and major (33 vs. 27%) postoperative complications as well as median ICU (1<br />

vs. 1 d) and hospital stay (10 vs. 11 d) were similar between both groups.<br />

Conclusion: Both IP and IC appear to be equally effective in protecting against postoperative<br />

liver injury in non-cirrhotic patients un<strong>der</strong>going major liver resection. However, IP is associated<br />

with lower blood loss and shorter resection time. Therefore, both strategies can be recommended<br />

for non-cirrhotic patients un<strong>der</strong>going liver resection.<br />

33.16<br />

G. Balsano 1 , R.E. Vandoni 2 , A.C. Guerra 1 , B. Fournier 3 , P. Gertsch 4<br />

1 Surgery, Ospedale San Giovanni, 6500 Bellinzona/CH, 2 Surgery, Ospedale San Giovanni,<br />

6500 bellinzona/CH, 3 Soleggio, Ospedale San Giovanni, 6500 Bellinzona/CH, 4 Chirurgia,<br />

Ospedale San Giovanni, 6500 Bellinzona/CH<br />

Probability and risks of conversion in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis<br />

Objective: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is routinely performed for the treatment of acute<br />

cholectystitis. We analysed retrospectively the results in our institution.<br />

Methods: We included only patients with a histologically proven acute cholecystitis.<br />

Experienced surgeons operated on all patients. Demographic data, time between onset of<br />

symptoms and operation, laboratory findings, operation time, conversion to laparatomy, complications<br />

and hospital stay were recorded and uni-and multivariate analysis performed.<br />

Results: From January 1st, 2000 to December 31st, 2004, we included 108 patients<br />

(55M/53F, mean age 61). One patient died of septic shock a few hours after operation and<br />

one patient was reoperated on day 5 for an incisional occlusive hernia through a trocart incison.<br />

One biliary leak was treated conservatively. Five minor complications were observed.<br />

Conversion to laparotomy was performed in twenty-two patients (20%) for inflammatory status<br />

(11 patients), adhesions (4 patients), haemorrhage (3 patients), bile duct stone (3<br />

patients) and intolerance to pneumoperitoneum (1 patient). Factors associated with conversion<br />

were: age (68±4 vs 59±2 years, p=0.03), longer delay between onset of symptoms and<br />

operation (12±17.1 vs 38.2±3<strong>4.</strong>6 hours, p=0.002) and higher C-reactive protein blood level<br />

(142±22 vs 71±11 U/ml). These patients had a longer operation time (139±8 vs 95±4 min,<br />

p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!