2018 Abstract Volume

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Upscaling agricultural water management indigenous knowledge practices through agro-ecological zones Presenting Author: Co-Authors: Mr. Ruhiza Boroto, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Italy Mr. Patrick Bahal Okwibale, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Ethiopia Dr. Jean-Marc Mwenge Kahinda, The Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), South Africa Keywords Indigenous Knowledge Practices, Agriculture Water Management, Agr0ec0logical zones, Resilience, Food Security Highlights A study has documented various agricultural water management Indigenous Knowledge Practices (IKP) across the African continent and beyond. It demonstrates that IKP can be upscaled to areas of similar agro ecological characteristics. This can enhance resilience and food security while preserving the natural resource base that sustains rural communities. Introduction and objectives Rural African communities sustain their livelihoods mostly through agriculture. Consequently, they are largely dependent on natural resources, particularly water and land. Their interaction with the environment has evolved, over centuries and through generations, into indigenous knowledge practices (IKP). The objectives of this seminar are: • To highlight the role of IKPs in the sustainable management of land, water and other natural resources • To demonstrate the opportunity for upscaling IKPs to agroecological zones of similar characteristics • To contribute to food security, resilience and the preservation of the natural resources • To share cases from Africa and elsewhere, as collected through a consultative e-forum. Methodology approach The following methodology has been used: • Field visits to selected countries to identify relevant IKPs • Literature review of similar IKP across the African continent • Analysis of the information received using GIS and spatial data on agro-ecological zones to establish linkages and identify options for upscaling • Consultative- e forum facilitated with four Technical Networks of the FAO, the Global Framework for Water Scarcity in Agriculture (WASAG) and other targeted stakeholders • Analysis of additional case studies from across the world, with special contributions • Validation of the findings through a webinar with the participants in the-forum. • Preparation of a compendium to be launched during the Stockholm WWW Analysis and results The results based on the analysis of the data collected prior to the e-consultation demonstrate that linking IKPs to their agro-ecological zones increases the potential for their upscaling to locations of similar agroecological characteristics. Such linkages were facilitated by the use of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and spatial data on agroecological zones in Africa with the following results: • A high diversity of IKP for land and water conservation was identified in sub-humid and semi-arid agro-ecologies, respectively accounting for 34% and 23.4% of the total number of identified practices. Seminar: Ecosystem based water management: From innovation to practice 82
• Fewer IKP were identified in arid (17%), coastal and wetlands (14.9%), humid (6.4%), and highland (4.3%) zones. Additional results are expected from the e-forum consultation that will take place in February and March <strong>2018</strong> and the case studies that will be solicited from the participants, to expand these findings beyond the African continent. Expected special contributions to the compendium: • IKP related to water and soil conservation by the Global Soils Partnership (GSP) • Innovative financing mechanisms that can facilitated the upscaling of IKPs; this will be provided by the working group on Financing Mechanisms of the WASAG partnership. Thus, an updated version of this analysis and results will be presented during the session. Conclusions and recommendation This seminar will demonstrate and/or recommend that in the context of water scarcity, increasing world population, food security, climate change and the ensuing pressure on natural resources: • Indigenous Knowledge Practices can significantly contribute to alleviating the pressure on natural resources by providing innovative options for their preservation while exploiting them for food production • Indigenous Knowledge Practices from one agroecological zone can be used in a zone with similar characteristics, thus upscaling their wider adoption • Opportunities for financing IKPs exist and should be explored innovatively • The overall benefits of upscaling IKPs include food security, resilience and sustainable natural resources management. Seminar: Ecosystem based water management: From innovation to practice 83
Page 1 and 2:
ABSTRACT VOLUME Photo: iStock World
Page 3 and 4:
Seminar: Tapping into collective wi
Page 5 and 6:
An alternative gender analytical ap
Page 7 and 8:
Circular economy practices for exot
Page 9 and 10:
Gendered approach in capitalising o
Page 11 and 12:
‘Green Lady of Bihar’ and susta
Page 13 and 14:
Human rights to water and sanitatio
Page 15 and 16:
Integrating indigenous and scientif
Page 17 and 18:
Monitoring SDGs 6, 5 and 14 through
Page 19 and 20:
What gets measured (by women), gets
Page 21 and 22:
Women, SDGs and climate related ada
Page 23 and 24:
Seminar: IWRM and ecosystem based a
Page 25 and 26:
Assessing the effectiveness of wate
Page 27 and 28:
Assessing the interconnectedness of
Page 29 and 30:
Can you sue a river? Legal rights a
Page 31 and 32: Effective stakeholder participation
Page 33 and 34: Environmental paradigm and water ma
Page 35 and 36: IWRM and ecosystem, the gap between
Page 37 and 38: Participatory ecosystem management
Page 39 and 40: Reducing uncertainty in ecosystem b
Page 41 and 42: SDG targets and implementation of I
Page 43 and 44: Seminar: Political drivers for sust
Page 45 and 46: A multinational commitment to save
Page 47 and 48: Cooperation and conflict: A subnati
Page 49 and 50: Linking water ecosystem services an
Page 51 and 52: Protracted conflict and the targeti
Page 53 and 54: Conclusions and recommendation EcoP
Page 55 and 56: the annual water saving in the six
Page 57 and 58: RBO-established institutional and g
Page 59 and 60: Seminar: Ecosystem based water mana
Page 61 and 62: measures to address such issues as
Page 63 and 64: Development of a curated global com
Page 65 and 66: Drivers for ecosystem-based flood m
Page 67 and 68: Enabling smart collaboration for th
Page 69 and 70: Environmental report-cards support
Page 71 and 72: Floods for food: Water spreading we
Page 73 and 74: How much groundwater can we pump an
Page 75 and 76: Conclusions and recommendation Alth
Page 77 and 78: modeling to consider future pressur
Page 79 and 80: critical to secure support for refo
Page 81: Conclusions and recommendation The
Page 85 and 86: Seminar: Industry’s role in ecosy
Page 87 and 88: their operating plants. Local commu
Page 89 and 90: Conclusions and recommendation WCL
Page 91 and 92: The fact that 88% of SMEs suppliers
Page 93 and 94: Conclusions and recommendation Prov
Page 95 and 96: Leveraging artificial intelligence
Page 97 and 98: Mining sector collective action on
Page 99 and 100: Public and private roles beyond 'fe
Page 101 and 102: Sinopec: Grey-green infrastructure
Page 103 and 104: Trends in water-related innovation
Page 105 and 106: Water stewardship and business valu
Page 107 and 108: Seminar: Sustainable infrastructure
Page 109 and 110: Building inclusive basin resilience
Page 111 and 112: Can Africa take the lead on sustain
Page 113 and 114: Controlling water disasters and bui
Page 115 and 116: Developing a robust water strategy
Page 117 and 118: Conclusions and recommendation The
Page 121 and 122: Conclusions and recommendation Know
Page 123 and 124: Conclusions and recommendation This
Page 125 and 126: Conclusions and recommendation Over
Page 131 and 132: Conclusions and recommendation •
Page 133 and 134:
Natural and built infrastructure ca
Page 135 and 136:
Promoting pathways to guide investm
Page 137 and 138:
Smart web-based IT solution for pla
Page 139 and 140:
Tracking sustainable infrastructure
Page 141 and 142:
Water for the city: ‘Greening’
Page 143 and 144:
Seminar: Is there such thing as inn
Page 145 and 146:
Adaptive PES: Financing sustainable
Page 147 and 148:
Economic and financial instruments
Page 149 and 150:
Establishing a trans-provincial eco
Page 151 and 152:
Financial sustainability of watersh
Page 153 and 154:
How to upscale financing for ecosys
Page 155 and 156:
miParamo, environmental financing m
Page 157 and 158:
Strengthening enabling conditions f
Page 159 and 160:
Seminar: Investing in freshwater ec
Page 161 and 162:
Balancing built and natural infrast
Page 163 and 164:
Conserving the Lake Tana ecosystem
Page 165 and 166:
Integrating water and energy bills
Page 167 and 168:
Investing in aquatic ecosystems and
Page 169 and 170:
Investing in free-flowing rivers: A
Page 171 and 172:
Making freshwater biodiversity in t
Page 173 and 174:
Private sector engagement with supp
Page 175 and 176:
Understanding freshwater biodiversi
Page 177 and 178:
Water community providers, ecosyste
Page 179 and 180:
Wetworking: A participatory network
Page 181 and 182:
Willingness to accept: Enticing lan
Page 183 and 184:
Seminar: Ecosystems in an urbanisin
Page 185 and 186:
Conclusions and recommendation For
Page 187 and 188:
Conclusions and recommendation Wate
Page 189 and 190:
Integrated approach for blue/green
Page 191 and 192:
Integrating green infrastructure in
Page 193 and 194:
Integrating land use and water mana
Page 195 and 196:
Is really ecosystem development han
Page 197 and 198:
Let nature do the work in the Stock
Page 199 and 200:
Conclusions and recommendation The
Page 201 and 202:
Conclusions and recommendation Our
Page 203:
The ecosystem in Gaza Strip between
show all

2018 Abstract Volume

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?