25.09.2018 Views

The Law of War

The Law of War

The Law of War

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

In June 1940, the Soviet Union forcibly annexed Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, and the<br />

disputed Romanian regions <strong>of</strong> Bessarabia, Northern Bukovina and Hertza. But after the<br />

German Army invaded the Soviet Union in June 1941 and the Japanese bombed Pearl<br />

Harbor in December 1941, the Soviet Union and the Allied powers formed an alliance <strong>of</strong><br />

convenience. Britain signed a formal alliance and the United States made an informal<br />

agreement. In wartime, the United States supplied Britain, the Soviet Union and other<br />

Allied nations through its Lend-Lease Program. However, Stalin remained highly<br />

suspicious, and he believed that the British and the Americans had conspired to ensure<br />

that the Soviets bore the brunt <strong>of</strong> the fighting against Nazi Germany. According to this<br />

view, the Western Allies had deliberately delayed opening a second anti-German front<br />

in order to step in at the last minute and shape the peace settlement. Thus, Soviet<br />

perceptions <strong>of</strong> the West left a strong undercurrent <strong>of</strong> tension and hostility between the<br />

Allied powers.<br />

End <strong>of</strong> World <strong>War</strong> II (1945–1947)<br />

<strong>War</strong>time Conferences Regarding Post-<strong>War</strong> Europe<br />

<strong>The</strong> Allies disagreed about how the European map should look, and how borders would<br />

be drawn, following the war. Each side held dissimilar ideas regarding the establishment<br />

and maintenance <strong>of</strong> post-war security. Some scholars contend that all the Western<br />

Allies desired a security system in which democratic governments were established as<br />

widely as possible, permitting countries to peacefully resolve differences through<br />

international organizations. Others note that the Atlantic powers were divided in their<br />

vision <strong>of</strong> the new post-war world. Roosevelt's goals—military victory in both Europe and<br />

Asia, the achievement <strong>of</strong> global American economic supremacy over the British Empire,<br />

and the creation <strong>of</strong> a world peace organization—were more global than Churchill's,<br />

which were mainly centered on securing control over the Mediterranean, ensuring the<br />

survival <strong>of</strong> the British Empire, and the independence <strong>of</strong> Central and Eastern European<br />

countries as a buffer between the Soviets and the United Kingdom.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Soviet Union sought to dominate the internal affairs <strong>of</strong> countries in its border<br />

regions. During the war, Stalin had created special training centers for communists from<br />

different countries so that they could set up secret police forces loyal to Moscow as<br />

soon as the Red Army took control. Soviet agents took control <strong>of</strong> the media, especially<br />

radio; they quickly harassed and then banned all independent civic institutions, from<br />

youth groups to schools, churches and rival political parties. Stalin also sought<br />

continued peace with Britain and the United States, hoping to focus on internal<br />

reconstruction and economic growth.<br />

In the American view, Stalin seemed a potential ally in accomplishing their goals,<br />

whereas in the British approach Stalin appeared as the greatest threat to the fulfillment<br />

<strong>of</strong> their agenda. With the Soviets already occupying most <strong>of</strong> Central and Eastern<br />

Europe, Stalin was at an advantage, and the two western leaders vied for his favors.<br />

Page 182 <strong>of</strong> 265

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!