25.09.2018 Views

The Law of War

The Law of War

The Law of War

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

On 8 November 2004, a federal court halted the proceeding <strong>of</strong> Salim Ahmed<br />

Hamdan, 34, <strong>of</strong> Yemen. Hamdan was to be the first Guantanamo detainee tried<br />

before a military commission. Judge James Robertson <strong>of</strong> the U.S. District Court<br />

for the District <strong>of</strong> Columbia ruled in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld [44] that no competent<br />

tribunal had found that Hamdan was not a prisoner <strong>of</strong> war under the Geneva<br />

Conventions.<br />

By 29 March 2005, all detainees at the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base had<br />

received hearings before Combatant Status Review Tribunals. <strong>The</strong> hearings<br />

resulted in the release <strong>of</strong> 38 detainees, and confirmed the enemy combatant<br />

status <strong>of</strong> 520 detainees. Reuters reported on 15 June 2005 only four detainees<br />

had been charged and that Joseph Margulies, one <strong>of</strong> the lawyers for the<br />

detainees said "<strong>The</strong> (reviews) are a sham ... <strong>The</strong>y mock this nation's commitment<br />

to due process, and it is past time for this mockery to end".<br />

Yaser Hamdi was captured in Afghanistan in November 2001. He was taken to<br />

Guantanamo Bay Naval Base, but was transferred to jails in Virginia and South Carolina<br />

after it became known that he was a U.S. citizen. On 23 September 2004, the United<br />

States Justice Department agreed to release Hamdi to Saudi Arabia, where he is also a<br />

citizen, on the condition that he gave up his U.S. citizenship. <strong>The</strong> deal also bars Hamdi<br />

from visiting certain countries and to inform Saudi <strong>of</strong>ficials if he plans to leave the<br />

kingdom. He was a party to a Supreme Court decision Hamdi v. Rumsfeld which issued<br />

a decision on 28 June 2004, repudiating the U.S. government's unilateral assertion <strong>of</strong><br />

executive authority to suspend the constitutional protections <strong>of</strong> individual liberty <strong>of</strong> a<br />

U.S. citizen. <strong>The</strong> Court recognized the power <strong>of</strong> the government to detain unlawful<br />

combatants, but ruled that detainees must have the ability to challenge their detention<br />

before an impartial judge. Though no single opinion <strong>of</strong> the Court commanded a majority,<br />

Page 77 <strong>of</strong> 265

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!