Bamford & Norden November 2018
Bamford & Norden November 2018
Bamford & Norden November 2018
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The initial inquiry by The Oliver<br />
Committee was held at Middleton<br />
Magistrate’s Court and heard evidence<br />
from Hanlon’s wife that he had been a<br />
happy husband and father, adding that<br />
he had made no particular<br />
complaints about his incarceration.<br />
Staff at Stakehill denied any wrongdoing.<br />
A pathologist, however, reported<br />
marks and bruises on his body and<br />
his neck and witnesses at the inquiry<br />
said that they had heard shouting and<br />
screams as well as threats from the<br />
guards the night before Hanlon was<br />
found dead. Some reported that Hanlon<br />
had told guards to leave him alone,<br />
that he felt dizzy and that the guards<br />
had said ‘You will be dizzier if I come<br />
in there!’ Other witnesses stated that<br />
Hanlon had been ‘treated to a beating’<br />
by three cleaners and three guards and<br />
that ill-treatment was commonplace at<br />
Stakehill. Even with these testimonies,<br />
the inquiry concluded that there was<br />
insufficient evidence to suggest that<br />
brutality had led to Hanlon’s death.<br />
However, by <strong>November</strong> there was<br />
continued public anxiety about what<br />
had happened at Stakehill and so a<br />
further court of enquiry was set up ‘of a<br />
more authoritative character,’ convened<br />
under the Army Act and therefore a<br />
military inquiry. It was held at Ashton-under-Lyne.<br />
Uriel Evans had by this<br />
time accumulated nearly 300 letters<br />
concerning the conditions at Stakehill<br />
and these were sent to the new inquiry.<br />
Controversially, the press was not<br />
allowed to attend, leading Reverend<br />
Evans to comment about the ‘dark and<br />
well-veiled secrets of the glasshouse’<br />
and suggesting that restricting public<br />
access to the proceedings was<br />
undemocratic, the composition of the<br />
court being entirely military. The result<br />
of the <strong>November</strong> enquiry maintained<br />
that there might have been irregularities<br />
of procedure only, and that individuals,<br />
not the system, must be held<br />
responsible for any shortcomings that<br />
may have occurred.The individuals<br />
would be reprimanded appropriately.<br />
The Rochdale Observer noted in<br />
December that Hanlon’s was not the<br />
first fatality at Stakehill as 15 months<br />
before another soldier had died three<br />
days after arriving, collapsing,<br />
allegedly during PT exercises.<br />
The case of Michael Hanlon remains<br />
shrouded in mystery but the fact that<br />
the proceedings of the second inquiry<br />
were held in camera and the testimony<br />
from many who knew of the cruelty<br />
dealt out to inmates was ignored,<br />
points to a tragic episode in the history<br />
of wartime Rochdale.<br />
If you have any memories or<br />
comments about the Stakehill<br />
Tragedy, I’d be happy to hear from<br />
you and add them to a growing<br />
Rochdale archive on the subject.<br />
Please contact Gary Heywood-Everett<br />
at garyheywoodeverett@yahoo.co.uk<br />
or leave your comments by text or<br />
recorded message at 01706817449.<br />
Visit our website www.streetwisemag.co.uk for all the info about the Streetwise magazines<br />
83