Thesis
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Results 99<br />
Starbucks<br />
2.85<br />
2.86<br />
Red Bull<br />
Heineken<br />
3.04<br />
3.10<br />
3.24<br />
3.88<br />
Apple<br />
Coca Cola<br />
2.62<br />
2.79<br />
2.66<br />
3.04<br />
Activia<br />
3.31<br />
3.45<br />
0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00<br />
Purchase intention (control group)<br />
Purchase intention (experiment group)<br />
Fig. 39 Purchase intention: experiment group vs. control group<br />
Source: experiment 2, 2015, n = 55<br />
The following null hypothesis was formulated regarding the relation between purchase<br />
intention and exposure to product placement:<br />
H0: There is no significant difference in purchase intention between exposure<br />
and non-exposure to product placement.<br />
Conducting a Mann-Whitney U test provided insights in the difference between<br />
these two groups. With α values higher than .05 the null-hypothesis was accepted<br />
for all product categories, stating that there is no difference in purchase intention<br />
between exposure and non-exposure to product placement. The results are therefore<br />
conclusive across product category. Table 33 and 34 provide an overview of<br />
respectively the ranks and test statistics of the Mann-Whitney test for the aforementioned<br />
variables.