10.06.2019 Views

Thesis

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Results 99<br />

Starbucks<br />

2.85<br />

2.86<br />

Red Bull<br />

Heineken<br />

3.04<br />

3.10<br />

3.24<br />

3.88<br />

Apple<br />

Coca Cola<br />

2.62<br />

2.79<br />

2.66<br />

3.04<br />

Activia<br />

3.31<br />

3.45<br />

0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00<br />

Purchase intention (control group)<br />

Purchase intention (experiment group)<br />

Fig. 39 Purchase intention: experiment group vs. control group<br />

Source: experiment 2, 2015, n = 55<br />

The following null hypothesis was formulated regarding the relation between purchase<br />

intention and exposure to product placement:<br />

H0: There is no significant difference in purchase intention between exposure<br />

and non-exposure to product placement.<br />

Conducting a Mann-Whitney U test provided insights in the difference between<br />

these two groups. With α values higher than .05 the null-hypothesis was accepted<br />

for all product categories, stating that there is no difference in purchase intention<br />

between exposure and non-exposure to product placement. The results are therefore<br />

conclusive across product category. Table 33 and 34 provide an overview of<br />

respectively the ranks and test statistics of the Mann-Whitney test for the aforementioned<br />

variables.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!