Thesis

Recommendations

Info

References 123 Rossiter, J. R. (1997). Advertising communications & promotion management / John R. Rossiter, Larry Percy. Boston MA [etc.]: Irwin McGraw-Hill. Rothenberg, R. (1991). Critics seek FTC action on products as movie stars. New York Times, 140(May 31), D1. Rotunno, T. (2012). Armstrong loses eight sponsors in a day. CNBC Consumer Nation, 18. Russell, C. A. (2002). Investigating the Effectiveness of Product Placements in Television Shows: The Role of Modality and Plot Connection Congruence on Brand Memory and Attitude. Journal Of Consumer Research, 29(3), 306-318. Russell, C. A. (1998). Toward A Framework of Product Placement: Theoretical Propositions. Advances In Consumer Research, 25(1), 357-362. Russell, C. A., & Belch, M. (2005). A Managerial Investigation into the Product Placement Industry. Journal Of Advertising Research, 45(1), 73-92. doi:10.1017/S0021849905050038 Russell, C. A., & Puto, C. P. (1999). Rethinking Television Audience Measures: An Exploration into the Construct of Audience Connectedness. Marketing Letters, 10(4), 393-407. Russell, C. A., & Stern, B. B. (2006). Consumers, Characters, and Products A Balance Model of Sitcom Product Placement Effects. JOURNAL OF ADVERTISING -UTAH-, (1). 7. Scott, J., & Craig-Lees, M. (2006). Conceptualisation, Consumer and Cognition: The 3 Cs That Will Advance Product Placement Research. ACR Asia-Pacific Advances. Shugerman New York, E. (2018, March 15). What is a millennial and when is the cutoff date for generation Y? Retrieved July 25, 2018, from https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/millennial-how-old-is-generation-y-cutoff-date-pew-researchcenter-a8235731.html Singh, D. (2013). The brand personality component of brand goodwill: some antecedents and consequences. Brand equity & advertising: Advertising's role in building strong brands, 83-96. Slováčková, T., & Souček, M. The influence of product placement in Czech movies and TV shows among generation Y.
124 References SMI. (n.d.). BeGaze Manual. Retrieved August 1, 2018, from https://psychologie.unibas.ch/fileadmin/user_upload/psychologie/Forschung/N-Lab/SMI_BeGaze_Manual.pdf Solomon, M. R., & Englis, B. C. (1994). OBSERVATIONS: THE BIG PICTURE: PRODUCT COMPLEMENTARITY AND INTEGRATED COMMUNICATIONS. Journal Of Advertising Research, 34(1), 57-63. Spary, S. (n.d.). Heineken: Bond is the 'ultimate man' and he knows what to drink. Retrieved August 1, 2018, from https://www.campaignlive.co.uk/article/heinekenbond-ultimate-man-knows-drink/1361014 Thode, H. C. (2002). Testing for normality. New York: Marcel Dekker. Tupes, E. C., & Christal, R. C. (1958). Stability of personality trait rating factors obtained under diverse conditions (No. WADC-TN-58-61). WRIGHT AIR DEVELOP- MENT CENTER WRIGHT-PATTERSON AFB OH. Turner, K. J. (2004). Insinuating the product into the message: An historical context for product placement. Journal of Promotion Management, 10(1-2), 9-14. Twenge, J. M., & Crocker, J. (2002). Race and self-esteem: meta-analyses comparing whites, blacks, Hispanics, Asians, and American Indians and comment on Gray-Little and Hafdahl (2000). U.S. Product Placement Market Grew 13.7% in 2017, Pacing for Faster Gr. (2018, June 13). Retrieved August 1, 2018, from https://www.prweb.com/releases/2018/06/prweb15558424.htm Wang, C. L., Bristol, T., Mowen, J. C., & Chakraborty, G. (2000). Alternative modes of self-construal: Dimensions of connectedness–separateness and advertising appeals to the cultural and gender-specific self. Journal of Consumer Psychology, , - 115. Wei, W. (2010). Tiger Woods lost $22 million in endorsements in 2010. Business Insider, 21. White, P. H., & Harkins, S. G. (1994). Race of Source Effects in the Elaboration Likelihood Model. Journal Of Personality & Social Psychology, 67(5), 790-807. Wicker, A. W. (1969). Attitudes versus actions: The relationship of verbal and overt behavioral responses to attitude objects. Journal of Social issues, 25(4), 41-78.
Page 1 and 2:
The Effects of Product Placement on
Page 4:
I would firstly and foremost like t
Page 8:
Abstract VAN WICHELEN, Steven. The
Page 11 and 12:
4.3 Self-reported effects of produc
Page 13 and 14:
12 Introduction x
Page 15 and 16:
14 Objectives 2 Objectives The gene
Page 17 and 18:
16 Literature Survey 3 Literature S
Page 19 and 20:
18 Literature Survey through brand
Page 21 and 22:
20 Literature Survey Fig. 2 Sub-dim
Page 23 and 24:
22 Literature Survey bring about gr
Page 25 and 26:
24 Literature Survey 3.2.2 Product
Page 27 and 28:
26 Literature Survey only (AUD) and
Page 29 and 30:
28 Literature Survey Apéria and Ge
Page 31 and 32:
30 Literature Survey and the charac
Page 33 and 34:
32 Literature Survey Tab. 1 Alignme
Page 35 and 36:
34 Literature Survey and experience
Page 37 and 38:
36 Literature Survey Fig. 7 A model
Page 39 and 40:
38 Literature Survey (words, object
Page 41 and 42:
40 Literature Survey affective comp
Page 43 and 44:
42 Methods and materials 4 Methods
Page 45 and 46:
44 Methods and materials can stand
Page 47 and 48:
46 Methods and materials moderator,
Page 49 and 50:
48 Methods and materials 4.3 Self-r
Page 51 and 52:
50 Methods and materials As the aim
Page 53 and 54:
52 Methods and materials Before exp
Page 55 and 56:
54 Methods and materials and its ca
Page 57 and 58:
56 Methods and materials fer across
Page 59:
58 Methods and materials The second
Page 64 and 65:
Results 63 Overall, brand recall wa
Page 66 and 67:
Results 65 indicating a medium to l
Page 68 and 69:
Results 67 To assess the level of s
Page 70 and 71:
Results 69 Tab. 18 Crosstabulation:
Page 72 and 73:
Results 71 20 15 10 5 0 15 14 9 5 0
Page 74 and 75: Results 73 Audiovisual types of pro
Page 76 and 77: Results 75 Tab. 23 Crosstabulation:
Page 78 and 79: Results 77 and 60%. The amount of s
Page 80 and 81: Results 79 Tab. 27 Product placemen
Page 82 and 83: Results 81 Fig. 21 Visual product p
Page 84 and 85: Results 83 24. With 32 subjects ind
Page 86 and 87: Results 85 Fig. 26 Audiovisual prod
Page 88 and 89: Results 87 brand is likely the reas
Page 90 and 91: Results 89 Starbucks 15 14 Red Bull
Page 92 and 93: Results 91 Starbucks 2.66 2.96 Red
Page 94 and 95: Results 93 The results regarding th
Page 96 and 97: Results 95 became less descriptive.
Page 98 and 99: Results 97 Red Bull (control group)
Page 100 and 101: Results 99 Starbucks 2.85 2.86 Red
Page 102 and 103: Results 101 to evoking and recallin
Page 104 and 105: Results 103 influence. It does not
Page 106 and 107: Discussion 105 Regarding product pr
Page 108 and 109: Discussion 107 (Kotler, 2012) in th
Page 110 and 111: Benefits of the thesis 109 • Mana
Page 112 and 113: Conclusion 111 evoke brand recall t
Page 114 and 115: References 113 9 References Aaker,
Page 116 and 117: References 115 Cacioppo, J. )., & P
Page 118 and 119: References 117 Ferrier, M. (2014, J
Page 120 and 121: References 119 Kahneman, D. (1973).
Page 122 and 123: References 121 McGuire, William J.
Page 126 and 127: References 125 Wiles, M. A., & Dani
Page 128 and 129: List of tables 127 Tab. 22 Intervie
Page 130 and 131: List of figures 129 Fig. 23 Visual
Page 132 and 133: Appendix 131 B Questionnaire interv
Page 134 and 135: Appendix 133 7. Which of the follow
Page 136 and 137: Appendix 135 Name Surname Gender Ag
Page 138 and 139: Appendix 137
show all

Thesis

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?