Thesis
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
100 Results<br />
Tab. 33 Mann-Whitney test: ranks (purchase intention brands)<br />
Brand Group N Mean Rank Sum of Ranks<br />
Activia Control group 26 18.40 478.50<br />
Experiment group 11 20.41 224.50<br />
Total 37<br />
Coca Cola Control group 26 27.96 727.00<br />
Experiment group 26 24.04 651.00<br />
Total 52<br />
Apple Control group 26 20.48 532.50<br />
Experiment group 17 24.32 413.50<br />
Total 43<br />
Heineken Control group 26 23.00 598.00<br />
Experiment group 17 20.47 348.00<br />
Total 43<br />
Red Bull Control group 26 25.37 659.50<br />
Experiment group 19 19.76 375.50<br />
Total<br />
Starbucks Control group 26 21.77 566.00<br />
Experiment group 15 19.67 295.00<br />
Total 41<br />
Source: experiment 2, 2015, n = 55<br />
Tab. 34 Mann-Whitney test: test statistics (purchase intention brands)<br />
Brand Mann-Whitney U Z Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)<br />
Activia 127.500 -0.535 0.593<br />
Coca Cola 300.000 0.718 0.473<br />
Apple 181.500 -1.020 0.308<br />
Heineken 195.000 -0.671 0.502<br />
Red Bull 185.500 -1.464 0.143<br />
Starbucks 175.000 -0.563 0.574<br />
Source: experiment 2, 2015, n = 55<br />
5.4 Practical implications<br />
5.4.1 Cognitive responses<br />
Attention<br />
Attention to product placement seems a fairly good predictor of brand recall. However,<br />
this relation is not absolute: paying attention to a product placed does not always result<br />
in recalling the brand. Contrarily, not paying attention to a product placed does not always<br />
result in failure to recall the brand: the context in which a product is placed can also lead