Linking Restoration and Ecological Succession (Springer ... - Inecol
Linking Restoration and Ecological Succession (Springer ... - Inecol
Linking Restoration and Ecological Succession (Springer ... - Inecol
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Chapter 3 Aboveground–Belowground Linkages, Ecosystem Development, <strong>and</strong> Ecosystem <strong>Restoration</strong> 53<br />
As discussed, restoration of New Zeal<strong>and</strong> forests, <strong>and</strong> promotion of successional<br />
changes in these forests to a less human-modified condition, would in the<br />
first instance require the removal of browsing mammals. Studies such as those<br />
described above enable us to predict, at both the community- <strong>and</strong> ecosystemlevels,<br />
the likely consequences of removing these mammals over the order of<br />
a few decades, <strong>and</strong> therefore the extent to which these forests can be restored.<br />
However, if restoration goals are to be focused on restoring these forests to<br />
their “natural” prehuman state, then the situation becomes more complex. This<br />
is because, prior to human settlement ca. 1000 years ago, New Zeal<strong>and</strong> was<br />
dominated by moas—a guild of large browsing native birds that were hunted to<br />
extinction a few hundred years ago <strong>and</strong> for which no contemporary substitutes<br />
exist. This effectively makes the goals of ecosystem restoration (i.e., reversion<br />
of these forests to a prehuman state) unattainable. Our knowledge of what<br />
effects moas had in these forests relative to those currently exerted by browsing<br />
mammals is far from clear (Atkinson <strong>and</strong> Greenwood 1989, McGlone <strong>and</strong><br />
Clarkson 1993), although the effects of moas were probably less than the current<br />
impacts of introduced mammals (McGlone <strong>and</strong> Clarkson 1993). Further, deer<br />
probably exert greater soil disturbance per unit body mass (<strong>and</strong> therefore have<br />
more adverse effects on litter dwelling invertebrates) than did moas, because<br />
of the relative shapes of their feet (Duncan <strong>and</strong> Holdaway 1989). In any case,<br />
it is apparent that deer <strong>and</strong> goats can exert important effects in natural forests<br />
at both the community- <strong>and</strong> ecosystem-levels, <strong>and</strong> both aboveground <strong>and</strong> belowground,<br />
through altering successional pathways in the ecosystem. Although<br />
goals to strictly restore these forests to prehuman conditions are unattainable<br />
because moas are extinct, it is apparent from the above example that significant<br />
restorative benefits to these forests are likely to result from targeted reductions<br />
in the densities of introduced mammals.<br />
3.4 Fire Regime <strong>and</strong> Swedish Boreal Forests<br />
Wildfire is the primary natural disturbance regime in boreal forests worldwide<br />
(Bonan <strong>and</strong> Shugart 1989), including those in Sc<strong>and</strong>inavia (Niklasson <strong>and</strong><br />
Granström 2000). Fire arrests forest successional development <strong>and</strong> prevents the<br />
system from entering long-term retrogressive phases by enabling greater availability<br />
of nutrients to rejuvenate the system (Zackrisson et al. 1996, De Luca<br />
et al. 2002a). Underst<strong>and</strong>ing the ecological influence of fire is therefore critical<br />
for underst<strong>and</strong>ing secondary succession in a wide range of ecosystems globally.<br />
Over the past 200 years, human activities have increased in the boreal forest<br />
zone of Sc<strong>and</strong>inavia, <strong>and</strong> interrupted the natural fire cycle through fire suppression.<br />
Prolonged suppression of wildfire may have important effects on global<br />
carbon storage patterns, through promoting greater sequestration of carbon in<br />
the ecosystem. This may help to partly explain the so-called “missing carbon”<br />
sink, or that carbon that is evolved as CO2 by fossil fuel burning but remains<br />
unaccounted for in global carbon budgets (Schimel 1995, Hurtt et al. 2002).<br />
Underst<strong>and</strong>ing these kinds of effects are highly relevant to restoration, because<br />
restoration of natural fire regimes in these forests, <strong>and</strong> the consequences of<br />
this for ecosystem succession, are likely to be very important as determinants<br />
of whether they act as net sources or sinks of carbon not just locally but also<br />
globally.