Linking Restoration and Ecological Succession (Springer ... - Inecol
Linking Restoration and Ecological Succession (Springer ... - Inecol
Linking Restoration and Ecological Succession (Springer ... - Inecol
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
114 Joachim Schrautzer et al.<br />
Alder carr,<br />
mesotrophic (1A)<br />
L<strong>and</strong>-use intensification<br />
Ab<strong>and</strong>onment<br />
Rewetting<br />
Species protection (high restoration potential)<br />
Species protection (low restoration potential)<br />
mean species number<br />
NPP/transpiration<br />
NPP/soil resp.<br />
N-balance<br />
NPP<br />
100 %<br />
80<br />
60<br />
40<br />
20<br />
0<br />
-20<br />
-40<br />
C-balance<br />
Sere A Sere B Sere C Re-wetting<br />
Small sedge reed (3)<br />
Tall sedge reed,<br />
mesotrophic (2A)<br />
N-net mineralization<br />
N-leaching<br />
Denitrification<br />
Micr. soil respiration<br />
Wet meadow,<br />
mesotrophic (4A)<br />
Wet meadow,<br />
mesotrophic (SSII)<br />
Alder carr, drained,<br />
mesotr. (SS IV)<br />
Wet meadow,<br />
eutrophic (4B)<br />
Wet meadow,<br />
eutrophic (SSII)<br />
Alder carr, drained,<br />
eutr. (SS IV)<br />
Wet pasture (5)<br />
Tall sedge reed,<br />
eutrophic (2B)<br />
Alder carr,<br />
eutrophic (1B)<br />
Figure 5.11 Amoeba diagrams to illustrate changes of the indicator values representing ecosystem functions during<br />
retrogressive succession following l<strong>and</strong>-use intensification, <strong>and</strong> progressive succession following ab<strong>and</strong>onment.<br />
Stages as in Fig. 5.1. Highest parameter values for all successional stages were set as 100%. Negative values<br />
(C-, N-balances) characterize the systems as nutrient sinks. <strong>Succession</strong>al stages III of seres A, B, <strong>and</strong> C are not<br />
presented.<br />
systems to alder carrs leads to higher nitrogen <strong>and</strong> carbon losses from the soil due<br />
to increased mineralization. The higher carbon storage in the woody phytomass<br />
of the ecosystems is restricted to the initial growth phase of these forests. It is<br />
difficult to predict when the development to alder carrs starts in ab<strong>and</strong>oned wet<br />
meadows. Long-term observations have shown that late successional stages of<br />
ab<strong>and</strong>oned wet meadows can remain stable for more than five decades due to<br />
missing disturbances. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, we detected a short-term development<br />
(5–10 years) of drained alder carrs mainly in previously grazed fens. These<br />
relationships should be taken into account if the implementation of large-scale<br />
grazing in fen areas is planned, because local undergrazing, which is a target<br />
of this nature conservation concept, can lead to a quick development of alder<br />
carrs (unpublished data, B. Holsten, Ecology Centre of Kiel). Furthermore,<br />
recommended management activities, such as planting alders to enhance carbon<br />
storage capacity of fens, has to be avoided if it is not possible to raise water<br />
levels in the degraded areas.