21.12.2012 Views

Linking Restoration and Ecological Succession (Springer ... - Inecol

Linking Restoration and Ecological Succession (Springer ... - Inecol

Linking Restoration and Ecological Succession (Springer ... - Inecol

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 5 <strong>Succession</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Restoration</strong> of Drained Fens 103<br />

that characterize tall sedge reeds <strong>and</strong> dominate in stages II <strong>and</strong> III of the successional<br />

seres, are larger.<br />

Seeds collected from species of all successional stages were buried in 3 cm<br />

<strong>and</strong> 8 cm of litter in a greenhouse to test establishment characteristics. The<br />

results show positive relationships between seed mass <strong>and</strong> establishment; the<br />

greatest establishment was in 3 cm of litter (Fig. 5.7A <strong>and</strong> Fig. 5.7B). Seed<br />

weights of target species from the sociological groups characterizing small<br />

sedge reeds <strong>and</strong> wet meadows (Scheuchzerio-Caricetea, Molinietalia) varied<br />

over a wide range (Fig. 5.7C).<br />

The longevity indices of Thompson et al. (1997) for seeds of these target<br />

species as well as species that are less specific to fen sites were between 0.3 <strong>and</strong><br />

0.5 (Fig. 5.7D). Although seeds from species of the Molinietalia had the lowest<br />

mean LI, the differences were not great <strong>and</strong> all species fell into the category<br />

“transient seed banks.” Taking the results of the burial experiment into account,<br />

mean longevity indices of the same species groups were much higher. There<br />

were no significant differences between the groups (Fig. 5.7D).<br />

5.3.5 Change of Species Richness by Mowing <strong>and</strong> Grazing<br />

Results of field experiments in the wet meadow sites (4A <strong>and</strong> 4B) (Table 5.6)<br />

showed that after a period greater than 5 years species richness was increased<br />

by mowing once in summer <strong>and</strong> by mowing two times a year. Autumn mowing<br />

showed a smaller increase in species numbers, <strong>and</strong> mowing three to four times<br />

in summer showed a small decrease (Table 5.6). In the wet pastures (5), mowing<br />

in autumn <strong>and</strong> summer (one or two cuts) increased species numbers by a<br />

small amount. Species increases were relatively small <strong>and</strong> variation between<br />

plots was high, nevertheless the overall results show that mowing once in summer<br />

or mowing twice increased species numbers in the meadow <strong>and</strong> pasture<br />

plots (Fig. 5.8). In contrast, ab<strong>and</strong>onment of meadows or pastures resulted in a<br />

significant decrease in species number.<br />

To evaluate the success of management measures aimed at the increase of biodiversity,<br />

it is important to consider the dynamics of the target species (Fig. 5.9).<br />

Mesotropic <strong>and</strong> eutrophic wet meadows (4A <strong>and</strong> 4B) had increased cover of target<br />

species with mowing two times per year. The increases in cover values were<br />

evident after about 10 years. Numbers of target species remained relatively constant<br />

in the wet meadows during the investigation period. Reestablishment of<br />

mowing in late successional stages of eutrophic wet meadows <strong>and</strong> wet pastures<br />

Table 5.6 Mean change of species number of wet meadows <strong>and</strong> wet pastures<br />

after establishment of different mowing regimes. In brackets: number of field<br />

experiments; x = not investigated. Ecosystems types are from Fig. 5.1.<br />

Duration of experiment:<br />

< 5 years 6–10 years<br />

Ecosystem type 4B 5 4A 4B 5<br />

Ab<strong>and</strong>onment −2 (7) −2 (7) −5 (9) −6 (8) −2 (5)<br />

Mowing (autumn, 1 cut) x 0 (7) −1(13) x 3 (5)<br />

Mowing (summer, 1 cut) 5 (11) 2 (9) 2 (13) 5 (11) 4 (7)<br />

Mowing (2 cuts) 4 (7) 1 (15) 3 (13) x 3 (7)<br />

Mowing (3–4 cuts) 2 (7) x -2 (13) x x

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!