Linking Restoration and Ecological Succession (Springer ... - Inecol
Linking Restoration and Ecological Succession (Springer ... - Inecol
Linking Restoration and Ecological Succession (Springer ... - Inecol
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Chapter 5 <strong>Succession</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Restoration</strong> of Drained Fens 107<br />
intensively grazed, dominantly wet pastures) following the introduction of a<br />
moderate grazing regime.<br />
5.4 Discussion<br />
5.4.1 Effects of L<strong>and</strong>-Use Intensification on Ecosystem Features<br />
L<strong>and</strong>-use intensity can be approximately equated with disturbance intensity<br />
(Grime 2001). However, here the mode of phytomass destruction indicating<br />
disturbance intensity varied (e.g., deforestation, mowing, or grazing) <strong>and</strong> other<br />
human impacts such as drainage <strong>and</strong> fertilization were superimposed. These<br />
complex variants need to be considered when evaluating the impact of disturbance<br />
intensity on ecosystem functioning. The intermediate disturbance hypothesis<br />
(IDH) is one of the most frequently suggested explanations for the<br />
coexistence of plant species in ecological communities (Wilson 1990). This<br />
hypothesis proposes that species richness is low at low <strong>and</strong> high disturbance,<br />
<strong>and</strong> is highest at medium disturbance. Species richness in the herbaceous stages<br />
of the l<strong>and</strong>-use intensification sere from tall sedge reeds to wet pastures (Fig. 5.4;<br />
2A through to 5) shows a hump-shape course conforming to the IDH (see also<br />
Gough et al. 1994, Schaffers 2002). The marked decline in species richness<br />
for the retrogressive succession from seminatural fen ecosystems (small sedge<br />
reeds <strong>and</strong> mesotrophic wet meadows) to wet pastures due to increased disturbance<br />
intensity has been noted in studies by Grootjans et al. (1986), Koerselman<br />
<strong>and</strong> Verhoeven (1995), <strong>and</strong> Wassen et al. (1996). However, if species-rich alder<br />
carrs are included, the IDH does not hold.<br />
The set of ecosystem indicators for water <strong>and</strong> nitrogen budgets reveals no<br />
clear progressive trends for all indicators across the retrogressive stages, but<br />
C-balance <strong>and</strong> metabolic efficiency decreased. The patterns for indicators other<br />
than C-balance were mainly high to low to higher across the stages <strong>and</strong> did<br />
not correlate well with species richness. Among all stages, alder carrs had<br />
highest NPP <strong>and</strong> acted as carbon sinks or had a well-balanced carbon budget.<br />
Measurements concerning the carbon cycle of alder carrs are scarce. Kutsch<br />
et al. (2000) measured a mean NPP of 8002 kg C ha −1 a −1 <strong>and</strong> a C-balance of<br />
+3550 C kg ha −1 a −1 based upon measurements of all processes of the carbon<br />
cycle for this forest type. These values are about 30% higher than the mean<br />
values given by the simulation with WASMOD. The reason for this difference<br />
might be that the alder carr investigated by Kutsch et al. (2000) was at a relatively<br />
young stage of development.<br />
The simulated NNM of alder carrs corresponded well with measured data.<br />
Döring-Mederake (1991) measured rates between 20 <strong>and</strong> 91 kg N ha −1 a −1 ,<br />
which are in accordance with the range of our simulated values (25–80 kg<br />
Nha −1 a −1 ). Due to higher simulated N-leaching <strong>and</strong> denitrification rates,<br />
alder carrs can be considered higher nitrogen sources than tall <strong>and</strong> small sedge<br />
reeds. Efficiency measures in alder carrs reached the highest values among all<br />
investigated systems.<br />
Simulated NNM, N-leaching, <strong>and</strong> denitrification rates for tall <strong>and</strong> small sedge<br />
reeds (2A, 2B, <strong>and</strong> 3) were low <strong>and</strong> carbon as well as nitrogen balances were positive<br />
or weakly negative. Measured carbon balances of these systems were not<br />
available but measurements for the nitrogen budget (Koerselman <strong>and</strong> Verhoeven<br />
1992) agreed with the simulated nitrogen balances.