21.12.2012 Views

Linking Restoration and Ecological Succession (Springer ... - Inecol

Linking Restoration and Ecological Succession (Springer ... - Inecol

Linking Restoration and Ecological Succession (Springer ... - Inecol

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 5 <strong>Succession</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Restoration</strong> of Drained Fens 97<br />

Figure 5.2 Undrained eutrophic alder carr with Alnus glutinosa <strong>and</strong> Carex acutiformis<br />

in Schaalsee, southeastern Schleswig-Holstein, Germany.<br />

above the surface (Table 5.3). Alder carrs are subdivided into a unit dominated<br />

by mesotrophic species of the Scheuchzerio-Caricetea (vegetation type<br />

1 A, Fig. 5.1) <strong>and</strong> a eutrophic unit without these species (vegetation type 1 B;<br />

Fig. 5.2). The C/N-ratio of the peat is higher at sites of the mesotrophic carr<br />

than at those of the eutrophic carr. After deforestation, alder carrs develop to<br />

tall sedge reeds (2 A, B). In most cases, the dominant sedges were present in the<br />

previous woody stages. Higher groundwater tables <strong>and</strong> longer flooding periods<br />

occur at sites of tall sedge reeds compared with sites of alder carrs, indicating<br />

the higher transpiration rate of the alders compared with the sedges. Moderate<br />

drainage <strong>and</strong> long-term mowing or grazing resulted in the development of small<br />

sedge reeds (3). A high C/N-ratio of the peat of these sites indicates low nitrogen<br />

availability. St<strong>and</strong>ing crop <strong>and</strong> the LAI of small sedge reeds are much lower<br />

than the respective values for tall sedge reeds (Table 5.3). Increased drainage<br />

transforms small sedge reeds into mesotrophic wet meadows (4 A), whereas<br />

eutrophic wet meadows (4 B) develop after drainage, mowing, <strong>and</strong> fertilization.<br />

A different trajectory for small sedge reeds to wet pastures (5) results from increased<br />

drainage, higher fertilization, <strong>and</strong> grazing with high stock densities (2–3<br />

cattle per ha). The main differences between wet meadows <strong>and</strong> wet pastures<br />

are that the groundwater tables are lower but the flooding duration is higher<br />

in wet pastures. The latter results from high compaction of the 0–20 cm peat<br />

horizon (bulk density 0.7 g cm −3 , Table 5.3). This compaction causes stagnant<br />

water after heavy rainfall (Schrautzer et al. 1996). Secondary succession from<br />

small sedge reeds via wet meadows to wet pastures resulted in an increase of<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ing crop <strong>and</strong> LAI of the vegetation (Table 5.3).<br />

5.2.3.2 Ab<strong>and</strong>onment Seres<br />

The four progressive successional stages shown in Fig. 5.1 following ab<strong>and</strong>onment<br />

are for seral types 3 (small sedge reed), labeled Sere A, 4A (mesotrophic

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!