Linking Restoration and Ecological Succession (Springer ... - Inecol
Linking Restoration and Ecological Succession (Springer ... - Inecol
Linking Restoration and Ecological Succession (Springer ... - Inecol
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Chapter 5 <strong>Succession</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Restoration</strong> of Drained Fens 97<br />
Figure 5.2 Undrained eutrophic alder carr with Alnus glutinosa <strong>and</strong> Carex acutiformis<br />
in Schaalsee, southeastern Schleswig-Holstein, Germany.<br />
above the surface (Table 5.3). Alder carrs are subdivided into a unit dominated<br />
by mesotrophic species of the Scheuchzerio-Caricetea (vegetation type<br />
1 A, Fig. 5.1) <strong>and</strong> a eutrophic unit without these species (vegetation type 1 B;<br />
Fig. 5.2). The C/N-ratio of the peat is higher at sites of the mesotrophic carr<br />
than at those of the eutrophic carr. After deforestation, alder carrs develop to<br />
tall sedge reeds (2 A, B). In most cases, the dominant sedges were present in the<br />
previous woody stages. Higher groundwater tables <strong>and</strong> longer flooding periods<br />
occur at sites of tall sedge reeds compared with sites of alder carrs, indicating<br />
the higher transpiration rate of the alders compared with the sedges. Moderate<br />
drainage <strong>and</strong> long-term mowing or grazing resulted in the development of small<br />
sedge reeds (3). A high C/N-ratio of the peat of these sites indicates low nitrogen<br />
availability. St<strong>and</strong>ing crop <strong>and</strong> the LAI of small sedge reeds are much lower<br />
than the respective values for tall sedge reeds (Table 5.3). Increased drainage<br />
transforms small sedge reeds into mesotrophic wet meadows (4 A), whereas<br />
eutrophic wet meadows (4 B) develop after drainage, mowing, <strong>and</strong> fertilization.<br />
A different trajectory for small sedge reeds to wet pastures (5) results from increased<br />
drainage, higher fertilization, <strong>and</strong> grazing with high stock densities (2–3<br />
cattle per ha). The main differences between wet meadows <strong>and</strong> wet pastures<br />
are that the groundwater tables are lower but the flooding duration is higher<br />
in wet pastures. The latter results from high compaction of the 0–20 cm peat<br />
horizon (bulk density 0.7 g cm −3 , Table 5.3). This compaction causes stagnant<br />
water after heavy rainfall (Schrautzer et al. 1996). Secondary succession from<br />
small sedge reeds via wet meadows to wet pastures resulted in an increase of<br />
st<strong>and</strong>ing crop <strong>and</strong> LAI of the vegetation (Table 5.3).<br />
5.2.3.2 Ab<strong>and</strong>onment Seres<br />
The four progressive successional stages shown in Fig. 5.1 following ab<strong>and</strong>onment<br />
are for seral types 3 (small sedge reed), labeled Sere A, 4A (mesotrophic