21.12.2012 Views

Linking Restoration and Ecological Succession (Springer ... - Inecol

Linking Restoration and Ecological Succession (Springer ... - Inecol

Linking Restoration and Ecological Succession (Springer ... - Inecol

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

100 Joachim Schrautzer et al.<br />

Species number/plot<br />

Species number/plot<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

F = 7.17<br />

p < 0.001<br />

a<br />

b<br />

c<br />

d<br />

1 A 1 B 2 A 2 B 3 4 A 4 B 5<br />

a<br />

a<br />

L<strong>and</strong>-use intensification sere F = 3.76<br />

Ab<strong>and</strong>onment: Sere A<br />

a<br />

p < 0.001<br />

b<br />

Ab<strong>and</strong>onment: Sere B<br />

I II III<br />

IV<br />

b<br />

b<br />

c<br />

F = 3.92<br />

p < 0.001<br />

b<br />

a<br />

F = 3.28<br />

p < 0.001<br />

b<br />

I II III<br />

IV<br />

a<br />

a<br />

c<br />

Ab<strong>and</strong>onment: Sere C<br />

I II III<br />

IV<br />

<strong>Succession</strong>al stage <strong>Succession</strong>al stage<br />

Figure 5.4 Change of species richness in the l<strong>and</strong>-use intensification (stages 1A to 5, see Fig 5.1) <strong>and</strong> in stages<br />

I–IV for ab<strong>and</strong>onment seres A, B <strong>and</strong> C. Plot size of alder carrs c. 100 m 2 <strong>and</strong> of types with herbaceous vegetation<br />

c. 16–25 m 2 . Medians, 25 <strong>and</strong> 75% percentiles , <strong>and</strong> ranges without outliers (horizontal lines) are shown. Kruskal-<br />

Wallis-test (F <strong>and</strong> p) results are also shown. Different letters show significant differences (p < 0.05, Median test)<br />

across stages.<br />

As a generalization across the retrogressive succession from alder carrs to wet<br />

pastures, C-balances progressively dropped; efficiency measures (NPP/MSR<br />

<strong>and</strong> NPP/Transpiration) also dropped but not as consistently as C-balances.<br />

Measures of N, hydrological budgets, <strong>and</strong> energy budgets started high (1A <strong>and</strong><br />

1B), then dropped (2A, 2B <strong>and</strong> 3), then rose again (4A, 4B <strong>and</strong> 5).<br />

Table 5.5 Simulation results (WASMOD) for nitrogen <strong>and</strong> carbon budgets parameters, <strong>and</strong> efficiency<br />

measures in stages of the l<strong>and</strong> use intensification sere. Ecosystem types are from Fig. 5.1.<br />

Ecosystem types<br />

Indicator: 1A 1B 2A 2B 3 4A 4B 5<br />

NNM (kg N ha −1 a −1 ) 38 56 14 27 11 28 84 125<br />

N-Leaching (kg N ha −1 a −1 ) −15 −18 −9 −12 −6 −13 −46 −64<br />

Denitr. (kg N ha −1 a −1 ) 17 29 3 7 3 12 52 100<br />

N-balance (kg N ha −1 a −1 ) −8 −23 3 −2 −4 −16 −24 −35<br />

NPP (kg C ha −1 a −1 )* 10 3 4.8 6.0 2.9 4 1 2.1 3.0 3.5<br />

C-balance (kg C ha −1 a −1 )* 10 3 +2 0 −0.6 +0.4 −1.3 −1.2 −5.6 −7.3<br />

NPP/MSR 1.8 1.4 0.8 1.1 0.6 0.9 0.5 0.6<br />

NPP/Transpiration 422 516 300 377 94 209 284 350<br />

b<br />

b<br />

a

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!