21.12.2012 Views

Linking Restoration and Ecological Succession (Springer ... - Inecol

Linking Restoration and Ecological Succession (Springer ... - Inecol

Linking Restoration and Ecological Succession (Springer ... - Inecol

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6.4 Habitats: Contrasting Problems <strong>and</strong> Solutions<br />

In this chapter we focus on aspects of ecological restoration in selected habitats,<br />

based mainly on our personal experience. However, we believe that the<br />

selection of habitats below illustrates the variability <strong>and</strong> potential for manipulating<br />

succession, <strong>and</strong> that the generic aspects of these case studies have a wider<br />

applicability.<br />

6.4.1 <strong>Succession</strong> in Heavily Disturbed Habitats<br />

6.4.1.1 Mining Sites<br />

Mining activity despoils ca. 1% of the l<strong>and</strong> surface (Walker 1999). Technical<br />

reclamation has usually prevailed, consisting of rough manipulations of the<br />

substrates such as remodeling, drainage, <strong>and</strong> covering the surface using various<br />

organic materials followed by restoration toward either grassl<strong>and</strong> or forest<br />

(Whisenant 1999). Unassisted succession has been rarely included intentionally<br />

as a part of a restoration project. In temperate Europe, for example, unassisted<br />

succession has produced more or less stabilized, seminatural vegetation in 20–<br />

30 years (Wolf 1985, Prach 1987, Kirmer <strong>and</strong> Mahn 2001). In a comparison of<br />

unassisted succession <strong>and</strong> technical reclamation schemes on coal spoil heaps in<br />

one of the largest active coal mining districts in Europe (northwestern Czech Republic),<br />

sites with unassisted succession had double the number of plant species<br />

<strong>and</strong> fewer invasive species (Fig. 6.2). Moreover, no investment was needed compared<br />

to the high costs ($50,000 ha−1 ) of technically reclaimed sites (Hodačová<br />

<strong>and</strong> Prach 2003). Spoil heaps, which revegetated spontaneously, also provided<br />

better refugia for rare <strong>and</strong> endangered species <strong>and</strong> did not exhibit any negative<br />

off-site effects (Benkewitz et al. 2002).<br />

Figure 6.2 A spoil heap from coal mining in northwestern Czech Republic. Unassisted<br />

succession led after 30 years to a diverse <strong>and</strong> more or less stabilized late successional<br />

stage that harbored double the number of plant species than technically reclaimed heaps<br />

of the same age.<br />

Chapter 6 Manipulation of <strong>Succession</strong> 127

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!