21.12.2012 Views

Linking Restoration and Ecological Succession (Springer ... - Inecol

Linking Restoration and Ecological Succession (Springer ... - Inecol

Linking Restoration and Ecological Succession (Springer ... - Inecol

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

82 Joe Walker <strong>and</strong> Paul Reddell<br />

Soil organic carbon (%)<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

sequences in lower montane rainforests on the Atherton Tablel<strong>and</strong>s in North<br />

Queensl<strong>and</strong> (Reddell, Hopkins <strong>and</strong> Spain, unpublished). The original rainforests<br />

of the Atherton Tablel<strong>and</strong> were extensively cleared for agricultural development<br />

in the early 20th century (Winter et al. 1987), but from the 1930s<br />

until recently, many areas were ab<strong>and</strong>oned for economic reasons. By interpreting<br />

a sequence of aerial photographs of the region from the 1940s to the late<br />

1990s, two replicated chronosequences of secondary rainforest succession on<br />

each of the two soil types (that contrasted strongly in their inherent fertility)<br />

were established. The secondary successional chronosequences were selected<br />

to include five distinctive structural/seral categories of vegetation. These categories<br />

were (1) herbl<strong>and</strong>, (2) shrubl<strong>and</strong>, (3) young secondary forest (approximately<br />

18–25 years of regrowth since ab<strong>and</strong>onment), (4) old secondary forest<br />

(approximately 50–70 years of regrowth since ab<strong>and</strong>onment) <strong>and</strong> (5) intact<br />

rainforest that had been selectively logged but not cleared. The two soil types<br />

for which the chronosequences were identified differed markedly in their chemical<br />

<strong>and</strong> physical properties <strong>and</strong> in the structural type of rainforest community<br />

that they were capable of supporting. The contrasting soil types were (1) an<br />

old, highly weathered soil derived from Palaeozoic schists <strong>and</strong> phyllites <strong>and</strong><br />

(2) a young, highly fertile, weakly weathered soil developed from Quaternary<br />

basaltic lavas. The two soils originally supported distinctive rainforest structural<br />

types, a simple <strong>and</strong> a complex notophyll vine forest, respectively (Tracey<br />

1982).<br />

Aspects of the floristics, biological productivity, rates of nutrient cycling, <strong>and</strong><br />

nutrient acquisition strategies by plants were then compared across the stages<br />

of rainforest succession on the young <strong>and</strong> old soils, revealing major differences<br />

in the rates <strong>and</strong> trajectories of major processes <strong>and</strong> plant attributes between the<br />

contrasting sequences (Fig. 4.6).<br />

In the case of the succession on the young soil type, measures of ecosystem<br />

function such as soil organic carbon, microbial biomass, <strong>and</strong> bulk density all<br />

increased consistently <strong>and</strong> progressively along the chronosequence <strong>and</strong> in the<br />

older secondary forests approached values in the comparable primary forest type<br />

(i.e., there was a progressive succession; Fig. 4.6). Exchangeable cations <strong>and</strong><br />

various compositional <strong>and</strong> structural parameters, including species diversity,<br />

average canopy height, <strong>and</strong> basal area, showed the same patterns. In contrast,<br />

(a) (b) (c)<br />

5 10 20 80 Primary<br />

Years<br />

Microbial carbon (g C g dry soil)<br />

800<br />

600<br />

400<br />

200<br />

0<br />

5 10 20 80 Primary<br />

Years<br />

Soil bulk density (g cm -3 )<br />

0.6<br />

0.8<br />

1.0<br />

1.2<br />

1.4<br />

5 10 20 80 Primary<br />

Figure 4.6 Soil organic carbon (a), microbial biomass (as measured by microbial carbon) (b), <strong>and</strong> soil bulk density<br />

(c) for rainforest successional sequences on young (solid line) <strong>and</strong> old soils (dotted line).<br />

Years

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!