Linking Restoration and Ecological Succession (Springer ... - Inecol
Linking Restoration and Ecological Succession (Springer ... - Inecol
Linking Restoration and Ecological Succession (Springer ... - Inecol
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
82 Joe Walker <strong>and</strong> Paul Reddell<br />
Soil organic carbon (%)<br />
10<br />
8<br />
6<br />
4<br />
2<br />
0<br />
sequences in lower montane rainforests on the Atherton Tablel<strong>and</strong>s in North<br />
Queensl<strong>and</strong> (Reddell, Hopkins <strong>and</strong> Spain, unpublished). The original rainforests<br />
of the Atherton Tablel<strong>and</strong> were extensively cleared for agricultural development<br />
in the early 20th century (Winter et al. 1987), but from the 1930s<br />
until recently, many areas were ab<strong>and</strong>oned for economic reasons. By interpreting<br />
a sequence of aerial photographs of the region from the 1940s to the late<br />
1990s, two replicated chronosequences of secondary rainforest succession on<br />
each of the two soil types (that contrasted strongly in their inherent fertility)<br />
were established. The secondary successional chronosequences were selected<br />
to include five distinctive structural/seral categories of vegetation. These categories<br />
were (1) herbl<strong>and</strong>, (2) shrubl<strong>and</strong>, (3) young secondary forest (approximately<br />
18–25 years of regrowth since ab<strong>and</strong>onment), (4) old secondary forest<br />
(approximately 50–70 years of regrowth since ab<strong>and</strong>onment) <strong>and</strong> (5) intact<br />
rainforest that had been selectively logged but not cleared. The two soil types<br />
for which the chronosequences were identified differed markedly in their chemical<br />
<strong>and</strong> physical properties <strong>and</strong> in the structural type of rainforest community<br />
that they were capable of supporting. The contrasting soil types were (1) an<br />
old, highly weathered soil derived from Palaeozoic schists <strong>and</strong> phyllites <strong>and</strong><br />
(2) a young, highly fertile, weakly weathered soil developed from Quaternary<br />
basaltic lavas. The two soils originally supported distinctive rainforest structural<br />
types, a simple <strong>and</strong> a complex notophyll vine forest, respectively (Tracey<br />
1982).<br />
Aspects of the floristics, biological productivity, rates of nutrient cycling, <strong>and</strong><br />
nutrient acquisition strategies by plants were then compared across the stages<br />
of rainforest succession on the young <strong>and</strong> old soils, revealing major differences<br />
in the rates <strong>and</strong> trajectories of major processes <strong>and</strong> plant attributes between the<br />
contrasting sequences (Fig. 4.6).<br />
In the case of the succession on the young soil type, measures of ecosystem<br />
function such as soil organic carbon, microbial biomass, <strong>and</strong> bulk density all<br />
increased consistently <strong>and</strong> progressively along the chronosequence <strong>and</strong> in the<br />
older secondary forests approached values in the comparable primary forest type<br />
(i.e., there was a progressive succession; Fig. 4.6). Exchangeable cations <strong>and</strong><br />
various compositional <strong>and</strong> structural parameters, including species diversity,<br />
average canopy height, <strong>and</strong> basal area, showed the same patterns. In contrast,<br />
(a) (b) (c)<br />
5 10 20 80 Primary<br />
Years<br />
Microbial carbon (g C g dry soil)<br />
800<br />
600<br />
400<br />
200<br />
0<br />
5 10 20 80 Primary<br />
Years<br />
Soil bulk density (g cm -3 )<br />
0.6<br />
0.8<br />
1.0<br />
1.2<br />
1.4<br />
5 10 20 80 Primary<br />
Figure 4.6 Soil organic carbon (a), microbial biomass (as measured by microbial carbon) (b), <strong>and</strong> soil bulk density<br />
(c) for rainforest successional sequences on young (solid line) <strong>and</strong> old soils (dotted line).<br />
Years