21.12.2012 Views

Linking Restoration and Ecological Succession (Springer ... - Inecol

Linking Restoration and Ecological Succession (Springer ... - Inecol

Linking Restoration and Ecological Succession (Springer ... - Inecol

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

152 Richard J. Hobbs, Anke Jentsch, <strong>and</strong> Vicky M. Temperton<br />

System variable<br />

(a) Deterministic (b) Stochastic<br />

(c) State <strong>and</strong> transition<br />

*<br />

*<br />

*<br />

*<br />

* Disturbance<br />

(d) Combined<br />

Time/stage of development<br />

Figure 7.1 Ecosystem dynamics can be depicted as (a) deterministic, (b) stochastic, or<br />

(c) state <strong>and</strong> transition. In reality a combination of all three is likely (d).<br />

from one stable state to another, with these changes being driven by particular<br />

events, such as various types of disturbance. Disturbance events of extreme<br />

magnitude can cause deterministic <strong>and</strong> stochastic dynamics to be nonlinear in<br />

the sense that no return to prior reference conditions or reference dynamics is<br />

possible.<br />

The age-old debate has been whether ecosystem development is stochastic<br />

or deterministic or something in between these two. Temperton <strong>and</strong> Hobbs<br />

(2004) came to the conclusion that most ecologists would agree that simple<br />

deterministic models are just that—too simple to describe the complexity of<br />

dynamics actually observed in most situations. While some apparently deterministic<br />

patterns are observable, there are usually variations around these <strong>and</strong><br />

often multiple developmental pathways are possible (Jentsch <strong>and</strong> Beyschlag<br />

2003, Suding et al. 2004, Cramer in press, Hobbs <strong>and</strong> Walker in press). These<br />

variations often relate to the timing <strong>and</strong> severity of particular disturbances,<br />

climatic events, or soil- <strong>and</strong> resource-related phenomena.<br />

It is increasingly clear that no one model of ecosystem dynamics is completely<br />

appropriate in all situations <strong>and</strong> for all systems. As indicated in Fig. 7.1(d), the<br />

same system may exhibit all three types of dynamics at different times, at different<br />

phases of development, or under different conditions. A further emerging<br />

realization is that whether we find stochastic, deterministic, or intermediate dynamics<br />

depends on the level of focus <strong>and</strong> on the temporal frame of reference.<br />

Fukami et al. (2005), for example, found community assembly rules over time<br />

when looking at plant traits but not plant species in an old field sowing experiment.<br />

Nevertheless, the recognition that different dynamic types are possible<br />

is an important one in the context of the discussion of the linkage among the<br />

different ideas surrounding succession, assembly, disturbance, <strong>and</strong> restoration.<br />

We first discuss recent developments in ideas concerning ecosystem assembly,<br />

<strong>and</strong> then return to the ideas of succession <strong>and</strong> disturbance.<br />

*<br />

*

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!