Linking Restoration and Ecological Succession (Springer ... - Inecol
Linking Restoration and Ecological Succession (Springer ... - Inecol
Linking Restoration and Ecological Succession (Springer ... - Inecol
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
152 Richard J. Hobbs, Anke Jentsch, <strong>and</strong> Vicky M. Temperton<br />
System variable<br />
(a) Deterministic (b) Stochastic<br />
(c) State <strong>and</strong> transition<br />
*<br />
*<br />
*<br />
*<br />
* Disturbance<br />
(d) Combined<br />
Time/stage of development<br />
Figure 7.1 Ecosystem dynamics can be depicted as (a) deterministic, (b) stochastic, or<br />
(c) state <strong>and</strong> transition. In reality a combination of all three is likely (d).<br />
from one stable state to another, with these changes being driven by particular<br />
events, such as various types of disturbance. Disturbance events of extreme<br />
magnitude can cause deterministic <strong>and</strong> stochastic dynamics to be nonlinear in<br />
the sense that no return to prior reference conditions or reference dynamics is<br />
possible.<br />
The age-old debate has been whether ecosystem development is stochastic<br />
or deterministic or something in between these two. Temperton <strong>and</strong> Hobbs<br />
(2004) came to the conclusion that most ecologists would agree that simple<br />
deterministic models are just that—too simple to describe the complexity of<br />
dynamics actually observed in most situations. While some apparently deterministic<br />
patterns are observable, there are usually variations around these <strong>and</strong><br />
often multiple developmental pathways are possible (Jentsch <strong>and</strong> Beyschlag<br />
2003, Suding et al. 2004, Cramer in press, Hobbs <strong>and</strong> Walker in press). These<br />
variations often relate to the timing <strong>and</strong> severity of particular disturbances,<br />
climatic events, or soil- <strong>and</strong> resource-related phenomena.<br />
It is increasingly clear that no one model of ecosystem dynamics is completely<br />
appropriate in all situations <strong>and</strong> for all systems. As indicated in Fig. 7.1(d), the<br />
same system may exhibit all three types of dynamics at different times, at different<br />
phases of development, or under different conditions. A further emerging<br />
realization is that whether we find stochastic, deterministic, or intermediate dynamics<br />
depends on the level of focus <strong>and</strong> on the temporal frame of reference.<br />
Fukami et al. (2005), for example, found community assembly rules over time<br />
when looking at plant traits but not plant species in an old field sowing experiment.<br />
Nevertheless, the recognition that different dynamic types are possible<br />
is an important one in the context of the discussion of the linkage among the<br />
different ideas surrounding succession, assembly, disturbance, <strong>and</strong> restoration.<br />
We first discuss recent developments in ideas concerning ecosystem assembly,<br />
<strong>and</strong> then return to the ideas of succession <strong>and</strong> disturbance.<br />
*<br />
*